APIs · head to head
Codat vs Yapily

Codat
APIs
One API for small business accounting, banking and commerce data
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Yapily
APIs
Open banking API infrastructure for account data and pay-by-bank payments across Europe
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Yapily has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Codat the accounting platforms are metering developer access themselves, with Xero introducing tiered connection based developer pricing from 2 March 2026, so a cost you do not control has been inserted between you and the data and it scales with the number of customers you connect.; Yapily production pricing itself is not published; only the resulting typical merchant transaction cost is publicly known, so the underlying platform fee still requires a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: Codat covers Normalised accounting API, Yapily covers Unified open banking API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Codat and Yapily actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Codat
- Normalised accounting API
- Banking and commerce data
- Lending products
- Write-back
- Business verification
- Supplier onboarding
- Connection management
- Data quality handling
Only in Yapily
- Unified open banking API
- Account information access
- Payment initiation
- Free sandbox
- Multi-country bank coverage
- Webhooks and reconciliation tooling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Codat
- A business lender that wants live ledger data for underwriting rather than a borrower emailing exported PDF accountsnot Yapily
- A commercial bank monitoring covenant compliance across a portfolio of small business borrowers continuously rather than quarterlynot Yapily
- A payment company verifying a merchant trading history before extending working capitalnot Yapily
- A B2B platform writing bills and payments back into a customer accounting system so reconciliation happens automaticallynot Yapily
Yapily
- A merchant wanting a lower-cost payment method alongside card acceptancenot Codat
- A lending or budgeting product needing bank account data for affordability checksnot Codat
- A business wanting one API instead of separate integrations to each bank's own open banking standardnot Codat
- A company prototyping open banking features for free in sandbox before committing budgetnot Codat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Codat
- The accounting platforms are metering developer access themselves, with Xero introducing tiered connection based developer pricing from 2 March 2026, so a cost you do not control has been inserted between you and the data and it scales with the number of customers you connect.
- Pricing is opaque and enterprise shaped for a product developers expect to evaluate technically first, so build decisions get made before anyone knows the unit economics.
- Normalisation hides but does not remove the underlying differences between accounting systems, and edge cases in multi-currency, journals and tax handling surface as data quality problems that your team must reason about in each source system anyway.
- Data quality depends on the small business keeping its books properly, so a lender using ledger data for underwriting inherits the bookkeeping standard of its worst borrower and needs its own validation layer regardless.
- Connection breakage from expired tokens and platform API changes is an ongoing operational load, and a borrower whose connection lapses stops being monitored silently, which is the failure mode that matters most in a lending portfolio.
Yapily
- Production pricing itself is not published; only the resulting typical merchant transaction cost is publicly known, so the underlying platform fee still requires a sales conversation.
- Consumer adoption of pay-by-bank still lags card payments, so merchants offering it as a checkout option typically see it used as a secondary rather than primary payment method.
- Coverage depends on the banks in each country maintaining reliable open banking APIs, and inconsistent bank-side reliability across markets is a known category-wide weakness, not unique to Yapily but not solved by it either.
- As infrastructure for both account data and payments, a company only needing one of those two capabilities is still evaluating a broader platform than it may need.
- Regulatory dependence on PSD2 and UK open banking rules means the underlying legal framework, not just Yapily's product, could shift and affect what is possible on the platform.
Pricing, plan by plan
Codat
On request- Codat Platform$undefined/year
- Priced by connected companies, data types and products
- Lending and verification products priced above core data access
- Annual enterprise agreements
Yapily
Free- SandboxFree
- Free testing environment
- UK and European bank connections for development
- Production$undefined/month
- Pay-as-you-go pricing, exact rates not published
- Typical pay-by-bank cost of 0.1 to 0.5% or a flat 5 to 30 pence per transaction
Which should you pick?
Choose Codat if
- You need normalised accounting api.
- You work on API, Web.
- You also want banking and commerce data.
Choose Yapily if
- You need unified open banking api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want account information access.
Questions people ask
- Is Codat or Yapily better?
- Neither clearly leads. Codat starts at On request and Yapily at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Codat or Yapily?
- Yapily has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Codat and Free for Yapily.
- Does Codat or Yapily run on more platforms?
- Codat runs on API, Web. Yapily runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Yapily for free?
- Yes. Yapily has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Codat starts at On request.
- What is Codat best used for?
- Codat is most often used for a business lender that wants live ledger data for underwriting rather than a borrower emailing exported pdf accounts, a commercial bank monitoring covenant compliance across a portfolio of small business borrowers continuously rather than quarterly, a payment company verifying a merchant trading history before extending working capital, a b2b platform writing bills and payments back into a customer accounting system so reconciliation happens automatically. Of those, a business lender that wants live ledger data for underwriting rather than a borrower emailing exported pdf accounts and a commercial bank monitoring covenant compliance across a portfolio of small business borrowers continuously rather than quarterly are not what Yapily is typically brought in for.
- What can Codat do that Yapily cannot?
- Codat covers Normalised accounting API, Banking and commerce data, Lending products, Write-back. Yapily covers Unified open banking API, Account information access, Payment initiation, Free sandbox.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Codat: What is changing with Xero in 2026?
Xero is introducing a tiered, usage based developer pricing model effective 2 March 2026, with tiers based on the number of customer connections an app holds. That is a new cost in the chain for anyone reading Xero data at scale, whether directly or through Codat.
Yapily: Is there a free way to try it?
Yes, sandbox access is free for development and testing.
Codat: Can Codat write data back?
Yes. It supports pushing bills, payments and journal entries into accounting systems, not only reading from them.
Yapily: How much cheaper is pay-by-bank than card payments?
Typically 0.1 to 0.5% of transaction value, or a flat 5 to 30 pence, against 1.5 to 3.5% for card scheme fees.
Codat: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted by connected companies, data types and products, and users consistently describe it as opaque.
Yapily: Is production pricing published?
No, production access is pay-as-you-go but exact rates require a sales conversation.
Codat: Does it replace bank data aggregation?
Not entirely. It covers banking alongside accounting and commerce, but lenders commonly run it beside a bank aggregator for transaction level cash flow.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Codat vs Rutter
- Codat vs Swan
- Codat vs Fintech Farm
- Codat vs Treasury Prime
- Codat vs Synctera
- Codat vs Solaris
- Codat vs Increase
- Codat vs Column
- Codat vs Griffin
- Codat vs Lithic
- Codat vs Unit
- Codat vs Vodeno
- Codat vs Bruno
- Codat vs Bud Financial
- Codat vs Episode Six
- Codat vs Kong Gateway
- Codat vs Marqeta
- Codat vs Meniga
- Codat vs Trustly
- Codat vs Aiia
- Codat vs Token.io
- Codat vs Tink
- Codat vs Volt
- Codat vs TrueLayer
- Codat vs Tribe Payments
- Codat vs Method Financial
- Codat vs Dwolla
- Codat vs Brite Payments
- Codat vs Salt Edge
- Codat vs Q2 Digital Banking
- Codat vs Stainless
- Codat vs Strapi
- Codat vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Codat vs Thredd
- Yapily vs Rutter
- Yapily vs Swan
- Yapily vs Fintech Farm
- Yapily vs Treasury Prime
- Yapily vs Synctera
- Yapily vs Solaris
- Yapily vs Increase
- Yapily vs Column
- Yapily vs Griffin
- Yapily vs Lithic
- Yapily vs Unit
- Yapily vs Vodeno
- Yapily vs Bruno
- Yapily vs Bud Financial
- Yapily vs Episode Six
- Yapily vs Kong Gateway
- Yapily vs Marqeta
- Yapily vs Meniga
- Yapily vs Trustly
- Yapily vs Aiia
- Yapily vs Token.io
- Yapily vs Tink
- Yapily vs Volt
- Yapily vs TrueLayer
- Yapily vs Tribe Payments
- Yapily vs Method Financial
- Yapily vs Dwolla
- Yapily vs Brite Payments
- Yapily vs Salt Edge
- Yapily vs Q2 Digital Banking
- Yapily vs Stainless
- Yapily vs Strapi
- Yapily vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Yapily vs Thredd
