APIs · head to head
Griffin vs Moov

Griffin
APIs
UK banking-as-a-service from a company that holds its own full banking licence
- From
- £100/month
- Rated
- -

Moov
APIs
Payments API with a published rate card covering card acceptance, ACH and instant payouts
- From
- $500/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Griffin platform banking carries a one-off onboarding fee from 15,000 pounds and a 3,500 pound monthly minimum, which prices out early-stage companies entirely.; Moov the 500 US dollar monthly minimum makes Moov unattractive below roughly 80,000 dollars a month of card volume, since the minimum rather than the rate becomes your effective price.
- They diverge on capability: Griffin covers Bank accounts by API, Moov covers Interchange-plus card acceptance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Griffin and Moov actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Griffin
- Bank accounts by API
- UK payment rails
- Integrated ledger
- Automated onboarding
- Debit cards
- Interest on balances
Only in Moov
- Interchange-plus card acceptance
- ACH transfers
- Instant payments
- Wallets
- Payment links and invoices
- Virtual cards
- Account verification
- Card account updater
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Griffin
- A wealth platform that must hold client money in a licensed bank rather than an EMI safeguarding accountnot Moov
- A lender wanting UK accounts and payment rails without becoming a bank itselfnot Moov
- A fintech burned by sponsor bank instability that wants the deposit holder and the API provider to be the same entitynot Moov
- A platform needing sub-account ledgering for pooled client funds with a clean audit trailnot Moov
Moov
- A vertical SaaS company embedding payments that needs published unit economics to price its own product before signing anythingnot Griffin
- A marketplace paying contractors that wants same-day ACH and instant push-to-card in one API with the cost of each visiblenot Griffin
- A platform that must hold balances for end users between collection and payout without becoming a money transmitternot Griffin
- A software company moving off a legacy gateway that wants interchange-plus transparency instead of a blended rate that hides interchange increasesnot Griffin
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Griffin
- Platform banking carries a one-off onboarding fee from 15,000 pounds and a 3,500 pound monthly minimum, which prices out early-stage companies entirely.
- It is UK-only, so a business with European or US operations needs a second banking provider and a second integration for those entities.
- It is a young bank with a small balance sheet relative to incumbents, and enterprise counterparties still ask hard questions about concentration risk.
- Holding a banking licence means Griffin applies bank-grade due diligence to its own clients, so onboarding is slower and more selective than an EMI-based provider.
- Feature breadth is narrower than long-established providers, particularly in card programme management and in payment types beyond core UK rails.
Moov
- The 500 US dollar monthly minimum makes Moov unattractive below roughly 80,000 dollars a month of card volume, since the minimum rather than the rate becomes your effective price.
- The 50 cent monthly charge per active wallet penalises platforms with many end users who transact rarely, and that cost grows with your user base rather than your revenue.
- United States only, so any platform with international sellers or buyers needs a second provider and a second reconciliation process.
- At very high volume the published interchange-plus markup is less competitive than a directly negotiated acquiring relationship, so success eventually creates a reason to leave.
- The ecosystem of prebuilt integrations, plugins and third-party tooling is far smaller than Stripe's, so anything outside the core API, from tax handling to subscription logic, is work you build yourself.
Pricing, plan by plan
Griffin
£100/month- Business Banking$100/month
- From 100 pounds per month
- Interest or commission from around 1.75 percent AER variable
- Operational accounts and UK payment rails
- Platform Banking$3500/month
- One-off onboarding fee from 15,000 pounds
- Minimum monthly spend of 3,500 pounds, drawn down by usage
- Higher committed tiers at 5,000 and 10,000 pounds with discounts
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom pricing
- Bespoke account structures and volumes
- Negotiated interest or commission share
Moov
$500/month- Standard$500/month
- 500 USD monthly minimum, no setup fee
- Card online at interchange plus 0.60% and 15c
- Tap to pay at interchange plus 0.50% and 15c
- Custom$undefined/month
- Negotiated rates for high volume
- Specialised business models
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Griffin if
- You need bank accounts by api.
- You work on Web, REST API.
- You also want uk payment rails.
Choose Moov if
- You need interchange-plus card acceptance.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android.
- You also want ach transfers.
Questions people ask
- Is Griffin or Moov better?
- Neither clearly leads. Griffin starts at £100/month and Moov at $500/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Griffin or Moov?
- Griffin starts at £100/month and Moov at $500/month.
- Does Griffin or Moov run on more platforms?
- Griffin runs on Web, REST API. Moov runs on Web, API, iOS, Android.
- What is Griffin best used for?
- Griffin is most often used for a wealth platform that must hold client money in a licensed bank rather than an emi safeguarding account, a lender wanting uk accounts and payment rails without becoming a bank itself, a fintech burned by sponsor bank instability that wants the deposit holder and the api provider to be the same entity, a platform needing sub-account ledgering for pooled client funds with a clean audit trail. Of those, a wealth platform that must hold client money in a licensed bank rather than an emi safeguarding account and a lender wanting uk accounts and payment rails without becoming a bank itself are not what Moov is typically brought in for.
- What can Griffin do that Moov cannot?
- Griffin covers Bank accounts by API, UK payment rails, Integrated ledger, Automated onboarding. Moov covers Interchange-plus card acceptance, ACH transfers, Instant payments, Wallets.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Griffin: Is Griffin actually a bank?
Yes. It received a UK banking licence with restrictions in March 2023 and a full licence in March 2024 after exiting mobilisation.
Moov: Does Moov publish its prices?
Yes, in unusual detail: interchange-plus card rates, per-transaction ACH and RTP charges, dispute and return fees, and the monthly minimum are all on the pricing page.
Griffin: What does it cost?
Business banking from 100 pounds a month; platform banking from a 15,000 pound onboarding fee plus a 3,500 pound monthly minimum drawn down by usage.
Moov: What is the monthly minimum?
500 US dollars, with no setup fee. Wallet charges and transaction fees count towards it.
Griffin: Does it cover Europe?
No. Griffin is a UK bank serving UK accounts and UK payment rails.
Moov: Can I use Moov outside the United States?
No. Moov handles US payments only, though it accepts international cards at an extra 1.5 percent.
Moov: Is Moov a bank?
No. It is a payments platform working with partner financial institutions, so account and settlement arrangements depend on those partners.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Griffin vs Weavr
- Griffin vs Synctera
- Griffin vs 10x Banking
- Griffin vs Skaleet
- Griffin vs Solaris
- Griffin vs Swan
- Griffin vs Treasury Prime
- Griffin vs Unit
- Griffin vs Vodeno
- Griffin vs Fintech Farm
- Griffin vs Astra
- Griffin vs Increase
- Griffin vs Temenos Transact
- Griffin vs Token.io
- Griffin vs Yapily
- Griffin vs Dwolla
- Griffin vs Formance
- Griffin vs Sila
- Griffin vs Trustly
- Griffin vs Volt
- Griffin vs Basis Theory
- Griffin vs TrueLayer
- Griffin vs Column
- Griffin vs Highnote
- Griffin vs Backbase
- Griffin vs Enfuce
- Griffin vs Lithic
- Griffin vs Stoplight
- Moov vs Weavr
- Moov vs Synctera
- Moov vs 10x Banking
- Moov vs Skaleet
- Moov vs Solaris
- Moov vs Swan
- Moov vs Treasury Prime
- Moov vs Unit
- Moov vs Vodeno
- Moov vs Fintech Farm
- Moov vs Astra
- Moov vs Increase
- Moov vs Temenos Transact
- Moov vs Token.io
- Moov vs Yapily
- Moov vs Dwolla
- Moov vs Formance
- Moov vs Sila
- Moov vs Trustly
- Moov vs Volt
- Moov vs Basis Theory
- Moov vs TrueLayer
- Moov vs Column
- Moov vs Highnote
- Moov vs Backbase
- Moov vs Enfuce
- Moov vs Lithic
- Moov vs Stoplight
