Construction & Architecture · head to head
CoConstruct vs Raken

CoConstruct
Construction & Architecture
Project management for custom home builders and remodelers
- From
- $99/month
- Rated
- -

Raken
Construction & Architecture
Daily reporting and field production tracking
- From
- $40/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CoConstruct coConstruct is being retired into Buildertrend, with the vendor stating the transition is entering its final phase and directing customers to migrate; Raken the Internet Archive's capture of Raken's pricing page on 13 December 2019 confirmed a 15-day free trial after which customers can purchase a paid plan or continue on a free Starter plan indefinitely, with annual billing saving 20% versus monthly; specific dollar figures per tier were not present in the captured page.
- They diverge on capability: CoConstruct covers Project scheduling, Raken covers Daily reporting.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CoConstruct and Raken actually diverge.
| Attribute | CoConstruct | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $99/month | $40/month |
| Founded | 2005 | 2014 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web, Ios, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction & Architecture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CoConstruct
- Project scheduling
- Estimating
- Client communication
- Selections management
- Financial tracking
- Xero
- Zapier
- Google Calendar
Only in Raken
- Daily reporting
- Photo documentation
- Time tracking
- Production tracking
- Safety toolbox talks
- Procore
- Autodesk BIM 360
- Sage
Both cover
- QuickBooks
- Data encryption
- Web support
- Ios support
- Android support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CoConstruct
- Custom home building and remodeling project management for existing CoConstruct accountsnot Raken
- Migrating an existing CoConstruct project history onto Buildertrendnot Raken
Raken
- Daily logsnot CoConstruct
- Field documentationnot CoConstruct
- Progress trackingnot CoConstruct
- Time managementnot CoConstruct
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CoConstruct
- CoConstruct is being retired into Buildertrend, with the vendor stating the transition is entering its final phase and directing customers to migrate
- No CoConstruct price, plan or minimum is published on its pricing page
Raken
- The Internet Archive's capture of Raken's pricing page on 13 December 2019 confirmed a 15-day free trial after which customers can purchase a paid plan or continue on a free Starter plan indefinitely, with annual billing saving 20% versus monthly; specific dollar figures per tier were not present in the captured page.
Pricing, plan by plan
CoConstruct
$99/month- Essential$99/month
- Project management
- Scheduling
- Client portal
- Advanced$399/month
- Everything in Essential
- Estimating
- Selections
- Complete$699/month
- Everything in Advanced
- Lead management
- Proposals
Raken
$40/month- Lite$40/month
- Daily reports
- Photo documentation
- Time tracking
- Pro$80/month
- Everything in Lite
- Production tracking
- Toolbox talks
- EnterpriseFree
- Custom workflows
- API access
- SSO
Which should you pick?
Choose CoConstruct if
- You need project scheduling.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want estimating.
Choose Raken if
- You need daily reporting.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want photo documentation.
Questions people ask
- Is CoConstruct or Raken better?
- Neither clearly leads. CoConstruct starts at $99/month and Raken at $40/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CoConstruct or Raken?
- CoConstruct starts at $99/month and Raken at $40/month.
- Does CoConstruct or Raken run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Ios, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is CoConstruct best used for?
- CoConstruct is most often used for custom home building and remodeling project management for existing coconstruct accounts, migrating an existing coconstruct project history onto buildertrend. Of those, custom home building and remodeling project management for existing coconstruct accounts and migrating an existing coconstruct project history onto buildertrend are not what Raken is typically brought in for.
- What can CoConstruct do that Raken cannot?
- CoConstruct covers Project scheduling, Estimating, Client communication, Selections management. Raken covers Daily reporting, Photo documentation, Time tracking, Production tracking. Both handle QuickBooks, Data encryption, Web support, Ios support.
Related pages
More on CoConstruct
Other head to heads
- CoConstruct vs ArchiCAD
- CoConstruct vs Autodesk Revit
- CoConstruct vs Procore
- CoConstruct vs SketchUp
- CoConstruct vs SketchUp Pro
- CoConstruct vs Vectorworks Architect
- CoConstruct vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- CoConstruct vs Bluebeam Revu
- CoConstruct vs BuildingConnected
- CoConstruct vs Fieldwire
- CoConstruct vs BricsCAD BIM
- CoConstruct vs Builderbox
- CoConstruct vs Buildertrend
- CoConstruct vs Buildxact
- CoConstruct vs Chief Architect
- CoConstruct vs CMiC
- CoConstruct vs ConstructConnect
- CoConstruct vs Contractor Foreman
- Raken vs ArchiCAD
- Raken vs Autodesk Revit
- Raken vs Procore
- Raken vs SketchUp
- Raken vs SketchUp Pro
- Raken vs Vectorworks Architect
- Raken vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Raken vs Bluebeam Revu
- Raken vs BuildingConnected
- Raken vs Fieldwire
- Raken vs BricsCAD BIM
- Raken vs Builderbox
- Raken vs Buildertrend
- Raken vs Buildxact
- Raken vs Chief Architect
- Raken vs CMiC
- Raken vs ConstructConnect
- Raken vs Contractor Foreman
