Databases · head to head
RisingWave vs SingleStore

RisingWave
Databases
Streaming database that maintains incremental materialised views in SQL instead of Flink jobs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

SingleStore
Databases
The real-time distributed SQL database for data-intensive applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: RisingWave anything that does not fit SQL, such as custom windowing, complex event processing or heavy stateful logic, still needs Flink, so RisingWave often adds a system rather than removing one.; SingleStore high licensing costs that increase with data scale and cluster size
- They diverge on capability: RisingWave covers SQL materialised views, SingleStore covers Real-time Analytics.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which RisingWave and SingleStore actually diverge.
| Attribute | RisingWave | SingleStore |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per RisingWave Unit hour | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud | Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed |
| Founded | Unknown | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in RisingWave
- SQL materialised views
- Postgres wire compatibility
- Object storage state
- Source connectors
- Sink connectors
- Iceberg tables
- Watermarks and windowing
- User defined functions
Only in SingleStore
- Real-time Analytics
- Fast Data Ingest
- In-memory Processing
- Distributed Architecture
- MySQL Compatible
- Columnar Storage
- Vector Search
- Kafka
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
RisingWave
- A team with Kafka topics that needs continuously fresh aggregates for a dashboard without standing up a Flink clusternot SingleStore
- A fraud or risk team maintaining rolling counters and joins across event streams expressed as SQL viewsnot SingleStore
- A company doing Postgres CDC into a real-time denormalised view for search or servingnot SingleStore
- An analytics group that wants streaming results landed directly into Apache Iceberg without a separate writer jobnot SingleStore
SingleStore
- Transaction processingnot RisingWave
- Data storagenot RisingWave
- Application backendnot RisingWave
- Reportingnot RisingWave
- Data analyticsnot RisingWave
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
RisingWave
- Anything that does not fit SQL, such as custom windowing, complex event processing or heavy stateful logic, still needs Flink, so RisingWave often adds a system rather than removing one.
- The Apache 2.0 community edition excludes premium features behind a licence key, and which capabilities sit on which side of that line moves between releases, so a self-hosted plan can be invalidated by an upgrade.
- Long-running materialised views accumulate state in object storage, and cost and recovery time grow with retention in ways that are hard to forecast before you are in production.
- The Postgres compatibility is protocol level; it is not a transactional Postgres and using it as a general purpose database, with point updates or high write concurrency, goes badly.
- It is a comparatively young venture-funded project competing with Flink, Materialize and warehouse-native streaming, and the ecosystem of connectors, operators and third-party expertise is much thinner.
SingleStore
- High licensing costs that increase with data scale and cluster size
- Eventual consistency in replication: secondary replicas may lag during high write loads
- Complex operational setup requiring specialized knowledge for optimization
- Vendor lock-in due to proprietary technology without open-source alternatives
- Disorganized documentation and lack of online training resources
Pricing, plan by plan
RisingWave
Free- Community EditionFree
- Apache 2.0 licence, self-hosted
- Core streaming engine and connectors
- Premium features excluded and require a licence key
- Cloud Basic$0.227/hour
- Billed per RisingWave Unit hour
- Hosted on AWS, GCP or Azure
- Capped at 64 cores
- Cloud Pro$undefined/year
- No core limit
- Bring your own cloud option
- Premium features included
- Self-managed Enterprise$undefined/year
- On premises or Kubernetes
- Premium features unlocked by licence
- Annual contract with SLA
SingleStore
Free- Free Tier$0.99/month
- Usage-based pricing
- Limited resources
Which should you pick?
Choose RisingWave if
- You need sql materialised views.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want postgres wire compatibility.
Choose SingleStore if
- You need real-time analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed.
- You also want fast data ingest.
Questions people ask
- Is RisingWave or SingleStore better?
- Neither clearly leads. RisingWave starts at Free and SingleStore at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, RisingWave or SingleStore?
- RisingWave starts at Free and SingleStore at Free.
- Does RisingWave or SingleStore run on more platforms?
- RisingWave runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. SingleStore runs on Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed.
- Can I use RisingWave for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is RisingWave best used for?
- RisingWave is most often used for a team with kafka topics that needs continuously fresh aggregates for a dashboard without standing up a flink cluster, a fraud or risk team maintaining rolling counters and joins across event streams expressed as sql views, a company doing postgres cdc into a real-time denormalised view for search or serving, an analytics group that wants streaming results landed directly into apache iceberg without a separate writer job. Of those, a team with kafka topics that needs continuously fresh aggregates for a dashboard without standing up a flink cluster and a fraud or risk team maintaining rolling counters and joins across event streams expressed as sql views are not what SingleStore is typically brought in for.
- What can RisingWave do that SingleStore cannot?
- RisingWave covers SQL materialised views, Postgres wire compatibility, Object storage state, Source connectors. SingleStore covers Real-time Analytics, Fast Data Ingest, In-memory Processing, Distributed Architecture.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
RisingWave: Is RisingWave open source?
The community edition is Apache 2.0 and self-hostable, but a set of premium features requires a paid licence key.
SingleStore: Does SingleStore offer a free tier?
Yes, SingleStore offers a free tier starting from $0.99/month with usage-based pricing. The free tier allows developers to evaluate the platform with limited resources before scaling to production workloads.
SourceRisingWave: What does the cloud cost?
It starts at 0.227 US dollars per RisingWave Unit hour on the Basic tier, which is capped at 64 cores.
SingleStore: Can SingleStore handle both transactional and analytical workloads?
Yes, SingleStore is a hybrid transactional/analytical processing (HTAP) database that combines operational (OLTP) and analytical (OLAP) workloads in a single unified engine, eliminating the need for separate systems.
SourceRisingWave: Does it replace Flink?
For SQL-expressible transformations, often yes. For custom stateful processing and complex event handling, no.
SingleStore: Does SingleStore integrate with Apache Spark?
Yes, SingleStore provides the Spark Connector 3.0 for bidirectional data integration with Apache Spark. The connector supports SQL, Python, Scala, Java, and R for data loading and extraction.
SourceRisingWave: Can I query it like Postgres?
Yes over the Postgres wire protocol, but it is an analytical streaming engine, not a transactional database.
SingleStore: Can SingleStore ingest data from Kafka?
Yes, SingleStore supports high-throughput streaming ingestion from Apache Kafka and other sources, enabling millions of events per second without requiring ETL pipelines or data movement.
SourceSingleStore: Is SingleStore available as cloud or self-managed?
SingleStore offers both deployment options: SingleStoreDB Cloud (managed service) and SingleStore Self-Managed for on-premises or private cloud deployments. The managed service handles infrastructure, scaling, and maintenance automatically.
SourceRelated pages
More on SingleStore
Other head to heads
- RisingWave vs Apache Flink
- RisingWave vs Materialize
- RisingWave vs Tinybird
- RisingWave vs Redpanda
- RisingWave vs Timeplus
- RisingWave vs Estuary
- RisingWave vs Instaclustr
- RisingWave vs Fivetran HVR
- RisingWave vs TiDB
- RisingWave vs Xata
- RisingWave vs Amazon Aurora
- RisingWave vs SQLite
- RisingWave vs StarRocks
- RisingWave vs SurrealDB
- RisingWave vs Teradata
- RisingWave vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- RisingWave vs Apache Kafka
- RisingWave vs Apache Druid
- RisingWave vs ClickHouse
- RisingWave vs DuckDB
- RisingWave vs Elasticsearch
- RisingWave vs TimescaleDB
- RisingWave vs Firebolt
- RisingWave vs Nile
- RisingWave vs Ninox
- RisingWave vs Presto
- RisingWave vs Privacera
- RisingWave vs RavenDB
- RisingWave vs Readyset
- RisingWave vs Apache Pinot
- SingleStore vs Apache Flink
- SingleStore vs Materialize
- SingleStore vs Tinybird
- SingleStore vs Redpanda
- SingleStore vs Timeplus
- SingleStore vs Estuary
- SingleStore vs Instaclustr
- SingleStore vs Fivetran HVR
- SingleStore vs TiDB
- SingleStore vs Xata
- SingleStore vs Amazon Aurora
- SingleStore vs SQLite
- SingleStore vs StarRocks
- SingleStore vs SurrealDB
- SingleStore vs Teradata
- SingleStore vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- SingleStore vs Apache Kafka
- SingleStore vs Apache Druid
- SingleStore vs ClickHouse
- SingleStore vs DuckDB
- SingleStore vs Elasticsearch
- SingleStore vs TimescaleDB
- SingleStore vs Firebolt
- SingleStore vs Nile
- SingleStore vs Ninox
- SingleStore vs Presto
- SingleStore vs Privacera
- SingleStore vs RavenDB
- SingleStore vs Readyset
- SingleStore vs Apache Pinot
