Softwr

Education · head to head

Clever vs Securly

Clever logo

Clever

Education

Single sign-on and roster synchronisation between district student records and classroom applications

From
Free
Rated
-
Securly logo

Securly

Education

Web filtering, student safety monitoring and device management for K-12 schools

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Clever has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Clever coverage is built around United States district data models and state reporting patterns, so schools outside the United States often find their student information system unsupported and their local identity conventions unrepresented.; Securly pricing stacks by module and only Filter has rates that surface publicly, so the quoted total for Filter plus Aware plus On-Call is routinely several times the number a district budgeted from the filtering line alone.
  • They diverge on capability: Clever covers Secure Sync, Securly covers Filter.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Clever and Securly actually diverge.

Attributes where Clever and Securly differ
AttributeCleverSecurly
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelquotePer student per year by module
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, ChromeOSWeb, iOS, Android, Chrome OS, Windows

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Education).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Clever

  • Secure Sync
  • Clever portal
  • Clever Badges
  • Instant Login
  • Clever IDM
  • Application analytics

Only in Securly

  • Filter
  • Aware
  • On-Call
  • Classroom
  • MDM
  • Pass
  • Home
  • Delegated admin

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Clever

  • A district that has bought forty classroom applications and wants pupils to reach all of them without forty passwordsnot Securly
  • Primary schools where pupils cannot yet type a password reliably and need badge loginnot Securly
  • District IT that needs accounts created and revoked automatically as pupils enrol and leavenot Securly
  • Evidencing to a board which licensed applications are used enough to justify renewalnot Securly

Securly

  • A district that must show CIPA compliance for take-home Chromebooks used on home broadband, where network-level filtering does nothingnot Clever
  • A district whose safeguarding policy requires that a human being reads a self-harm alert within minutes at any hour, including school holidaysnot Clever
  • A one-to-one iPad programme needing Apple device enrolment, filtering and classroom control from a single agent rather than threenot Clever
  • A district under pressure from parents who want visibility of what their child does on the school device at home, without the school having to field each request by handnot Clever

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Clever

  • Coverage is built around United States district data models and state reporting patterns, so schools outside the United States often find their student information system unsupported and their local identity conventions unrepresented.
  • Because application vendors pay and districts do not, a district has no commercial leverage when a sync breaks, and support priority follows the paying side of the market.
  • Rostering is a single point of failure. One bad field mapping propagates wrong class lists to every connected application at once, and unpicking it means correcting the source system and waiting for the next sync cycle.
  • Sync is scheduled rather than immediate for many connections, so a pupil who transfers mid week can sit in the wrong class in several applications for a day or more.
  • Ownership moved to Kahoot! in 2021 and then to a private equity consortium in 2023, so a district is now depending on infrastructure whose long term roadmap is set by investor timelines rather than by education procurement cycles.

Securly

  • Pricing stacks by module and only Filter has rates that surface publicly, so the quoted total for Filter plus Aware plus On-Call is routinely several times the number a district budgeted from the filtering line alone.
  • The safety scanning generates false positives at volume, including song lyrics, creative writing and health-class assignments, and each one consumes counsellor or administrator time that the vendor does not pay for.
  • Alerting on student writing is a surveillance decision with real community consequences, and districts that deploy it without an explicit board policy and parent notification have faced local objections after the fact.
  • Coverage is strongest on managed Chromebooks; personal devices, non-Chrome browsers and encrypted apps outside the agent leave gaps that the compliance story quietly depends on nobody testing.
  • Per-student pricing is charged on enrolment rather than on devices, so a district that issues devices to only some year groups still pays for every student on the roll.

Pricing, plan by plan

Clever

Free
  • Clever core rostering and single sign-on$undefined/year
    • Free to United States districts
    • Funded by application vendors rather than the district
    • Secure Sync, portal and Badges included
  • Clever paid district products$undefined/year
    • Identity management and account provisioning
    • Multi-factor authentication for staff
    • Pricing quoted per district, not published

Securly

On request
  • Filter$undefined/year
    • Web filtering on and off network
    • Tiered per-student rates that fall as enrolment rises
    • Published in some purchasing co-operative catalogues, not on the vendor site
  • Aware$undefined/year
    • Automated scanning of email, documents and search for safety risk
    • Quoted per student, no public rate
  • On-Call$undefined/year
    • 24/7 human review and escalation of serious alerts
    • Quoted per student, priced on top of Aware
  • Classroom, MDM and Pass$undefined/year
    • Sold as separate per-student modules
    • Quoted

Which should you pick?

Choose Clever if

  • You need secure sync.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, ChromeOS.
  • You also want clever portal.

Choose Securly if

  • You need filter.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, Chrome OS, Windows.
  • You also want aware.

Questions people ask

Is Clever or Securly better?
Neither clearly leads. Clever starts at Free and Securly at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Clever or Securly?
Clever has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Clever and On request for Securly.
Does Clever or Securly run on more platforms?
Clever runs on Web, iOS, Android, ChromeOS. Securly runs on Web, iOS, Android, Chrome OS, Windows.
Can I use Clever for free?
Yes. Clever has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Securly starts at On request.
What is Clever best used for?
Clever is most often used for a district that has bought forty classroom applications and wants pupils to reach all of them without forty passwords, primary schools where pupils cannot yet type a password reliably and need badge login, district it that needs accounts created and revoked automatically as pupils enrol and leave, evidencing to a board which licensed applications are used enough to justify renewal. Of those, a district that has bought forty classroom applications and wants pupils to reach all of them without forty passwords and primary schools where pupils cannot yet type a password reliably and need badge login are not what Securly is typically brought in for.
What can Clever do that Securly cannot?
Clever covers Secure Sync, Clever portal, Clever Badges, Instant Login. Securly covers Filter, Aware, On-Call, Classroom.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Clever: Does Clever really cost a district nothing?

The core rostering and single sign-on service is free to districts. Application vendors pay for the connection and build that cost into what they charge the district, so the money reaches Clever through the software bill instead of a direct invoice.

Securly: Does Securly publish pricing?

Not on its own site. Tiered per-student rates for Filter appear in some US purchasing co-operative catalogues, falling as enrolment rises, but Aware, On-Call, Classroom, MDM and Pass are quoted.

Clever: Is Clever FERPA and COPPA compliant?

Clever operates as a school official under FERPA, acting on district instruction, and relies on district consent rather than parental consent for COPPA. It has signed the Student Privacy Pledge.

Securly: What is the difference between Aware and On-Call?

Aware is the automated detection that produces alerts. On-Call is the staffed service that reads the serious ones out of hours and phones your escalation contacts. Buying Aware alone leaves the triage with your own staff.

Clever: What happens if we leave Clever?

Every connected application loses its roster feed and needs a replacement method, either a competing rostering service or manual CSV uploads per application. That is why districts rarely switch once more than a handful of applications depend on it.

Securly: Does it filter on home internet?

Yes, filtering follows the managed device rather than the network, which is the point for take-home Chromebook programmes.

Securly: Is student data used for anything else?

Securly signs the US Student Privacy Pledge and district data processing agreements; check the specific DPA rather than the marketing page, since scanning scope and retention are negotiated terms.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads