Machine Learning · head to head
ClearML vs Databricks

ClearML
Machine Learning
Open-source MLOps platform for experiment tracking and orchestration
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Databricks
Machine Learning
Unified analytics platform for data engineering and data science
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ClearML broad scope means more to learn and more to run than a focused tracking tool; Databricks cloud compute is billed separately by the cloud provider on top of Databricks DBU charges
- They diverge on capability: ClearML covers Experiment tracking, Databricks covers Delta Lake.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ClearML and Databricks actually diverge.
| Attribute | ClearML | Databricks |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open-source self-hosted, with paid hosted and enterprise tiers | usage-based |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes | Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ClearML
- Experiment tracking
- Remote execution
- Data versioning
- Pipelines
Only in Databricks
- Delta Lake
- Apache Spark
- MLflow
- Unity Catalog
- Photon Engine
- Collaborative Notebooks
- Auto-scaling
- AWS
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ClearML
- Tracking experiments across a team so results are reproduciblenot Databricks
- Moving training from laptops to shared GPU hardware without repackagingnot Databricks
- Versioning datasets alongside the experiments that consumed themnot Databricks
Databricks
- Running Spark data engineering pipelines on managed clustersnot ClearML
- Building a lakehouse over data in cloud object storagenot ClearML
- Training and serving machine learning models alongside the datanot ClearML
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ClearML
- Broad scope means more to learn and more to run than a focused tracking tool
- Self-hosting the server is real infrastructure — database, file storage and web server
- Documentation quality is uneven across the newer parts of the platform
- Smaller community than the most popular tracking tools, so fewer worked examples exist
Databricks
- Cloud compute is billed separately by the cloud provider on top of Databricks DBU charges
- The free trial lasts 14 days
- Discounts require a Committed Use Contract, with larger commitments needed for larger discounts
- Azure Databricks pricing is set by Microsoft rather than by Databricks
- Security and compliance capabilities are sold as separate platform add ons rather than included in the base rate
Pricing, plan by plan
ClearML
Free- Open sourceFree
- Experiment tracking
- Pipelines
- Self-hosted server
Databricks
Free- Community EditionFree
- Limited cluster
- Notebook environment
- Community support
- Standard$0.07/DBU
- Jobs compute
- SQL compute
- Standard support
Which should you pick?
Choose ClearML if
- You need experiment tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want remote execution.
Choose Databricks if
- You need delta lake.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp.
- You also want apache spark.
Questions people ask
- Is ClearML or Databricks better?
- Neither clearly leads. ClearML starts at Free and Databricks at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ClearML or Databricks?
- ClearML starts at Free and Databricks at Free.
- Does ClearML or Databricks run on more platforms?
- ClearML runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes. Databricks runs on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp.
- Can I use ClearML for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ClearML best used for?
- ClearML is most often used for tracking experiments across a team so results are reproducible, moving training from laptops to shared gpu hardware without repackaging, versioning datasets alongside the experiments that consumed them. Of those, tracking experiments across a team so results are reproducible and moving training from laptops to shared gpu hardware without repackaging are not what Databricks is typically brought in for.
- What can ClearML do that Databricks cannot?
- ClearML covers Experiment tracking, Remote execution, Data versioning, Pipelines. Databricks covers Delta Lake, Apache Spark, MLflow, Unity Catalog.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ClearML: Is ClearML free?
The open-source version is free and self-hostable. Hosted and enterprise tiers are paid.
Databricks: How is Databricks priced?
Databricks bills pay as you go with no up front cost, charging per second for the products used. Consumption is measured in Databricks Units, a normalised unit of processing power on the platform.
SourceClearML: How much code does tracking require?
Very little — adding a couple of lines to an existing training script captures parameters, metrics and environment automatically.
Databricks: Does Databricks publish a per DBU price?
Not on its main pricing page. Rates vary by product and instance type, and Databricks directs buyers to individual product pricing pages and a calculator rather than listing a single figure.
SourceClearML: Does ClearML replace MLflow?
It covers MLflow’s tracking and adds orchestration, remote execution and data versioning. Whether that breadth is an advantage or extra weight depends on whether you need the rest.
Databricks: Does the Databricks price include cloud costs?
No. Databricks states that if you configure it to work with your own cloud account, your cloud provider still charges you separately for the underlying resources.
SourceDatabricks: Can I get a discount on Databricks?
Databricks offers Committed Use Contracts, where larger usage commitments earn greater benefits, including options to use commitments flexibly across multiple clouds.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- ClearML vs MLflow
- ClearML vs Weights & Biases
- ClearML vs Comet ML
- ClearML vs Neptune.ai
- ClearML vs Dataiku
- ClearML vs Pachyderm
- ClearML vs Azure Machine Learning
- ClearML vs Domino Data Lab
- ClearML vs DVC
- ClearML vs AWS SageMaker
- ClearML vs Google Vertex AI
- ClearML vs DataRobot
- ClearML vs Pinecone
- ClearML vs Python
- ClearML vs PyTorch
- ClearML vs scikit-learn
- ClearML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- ClearML vs Weaviate
- ClearML vs TensorFlow
- ClearML vs SAS
- ClearML vs Snowflake
- ClearML vs Alteryx
- ClearML vs IBM SPSS
- ClearML vs Palantir Foundry
- ClearML vs BentoML
- ClearML vs Cohere
- ClearML vs Dask
- ClearML vs Fal AI
- ClearML vs BigQuery ML
- Databricks vs MLflow
- Databricks vs Weights & Biases
- Databricks vs Comet ML
- Databricks vs Neptune.ai
- Databricks vs Dataiku
- Databricks vs Pachyderm
- Databricks vs Azure Machine Learning
- Databricks vs Domino Data Lab
- Databricks vs DVC
- Databricks vs AWS SageMaker
- Databricks vs Google Vertex AI
- Databricks vs DataRobot
- Databricks vs Pinecone
- Databricks vs Python
- Databricks vs PyTorch
- Databricks vs scikit-learn
- Databricks vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Databricks vs Weaviate
- Databricks vs TensorFlow
- Databricks vs SAS
- Databricks vs Snowflake
- Databricks vs Alteryx
- Databricks vs IBM SPSS
- Databricks vs Palantir Foundry
- Databricks vs BentoML
- Databricks vs Cohere
- Databricks vs Dask
- Databricks vs Fal AI
- Databricks vs BigQuery ML
