Software · head to head
Databricks vs Pachyderm

Databricks
Software
Unified analytics platform for data engineering and data science
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Databricks cloud compute is billed separately by the cloud provider on top of Databricks DBU charges; Pachyderm core software is Apache-2.0 licensed and free to self-host
- They diverge on capability: Databricks covers Delta Lake, Pachyderm covers Data versioning.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Databricks and Pachyderm actually diverge.
| Attribute | Databricks | Pachyderm |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp | Linux |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Databricks
- Delta Lake
- Apache Spark
- MLflow
- Unity Catalog
- Photon Engine
- Collaborative Notebooks
- Auto-scaling
- AWS
Only in Pachyderm
- Data versioning
- Data-driven pipelines
- Automatic provenance
- Kubernetes-native
- Reproducibility
- Kubernetes
- S3
- GCS
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Databricks
- Running Spark data engineering pipelines on managed clustersnot Pachyderm
- Building a lakehouse over data in cloud object storagenot Pachyderm
- Training and serving machine learning models alongside the datanot Pachyderm
Pachyderm
- Machine learningnot Databricks
- Data analysisnot Databricks
- Model trainingnot Databricks
- Predictive analyticsnot Databricks
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Databricks
- Cloud compute is billed separately by the cloud provider on top of Databricks DBU charges
- The free trial lasts 14 days
- Discounts require a Committed Use Contract, with larger commitments needed for larger discounts
- Azure Databricks pricing is set by Microsoft rather than by Databricks
- Security and compliance capabilities are sold as separate platform add ons rather than included in the base rate
Pachyderm
- Core software is Apache-2.0 licensed and free to self-host
Pricing, plan by plan
Databricks
Free- Community EditionFree
- Limited cluster
- Notebook environment
- Community support
- Standard$0.07/DBU
- Jobs compute
- SQL compute
- Standard support
Pachyderm
Free- CommunityFree
- Core features
- Community support
- EnterpriseFree
- Advanced security
- Premium support
- SLAs
Which should you pick?
Choose Databricks if
- You need delta lake.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp.
- You also want apache spark.
Choose Pachyderm if
- You need data versioning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want data-driven pipelines.
Questions people ask
- Is Databricks or Pachyderm better?
- Neither clearly leads. Databricks starts at Free and Pachyderm at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Databricks or Pachyderm?
- Databricks starts at Free and Pachyderm at Free.
- Does Databricks or Pachyderm run on more platforms?
- Databricks runs on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp. Pachyderm runs on Linux.
- Can I use Databricks for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Databricks best used for?
- Databricks is most often used for running spark data engineering pipelines on managed clusters, building a lakehouse over data in cloud object storage, training and serving machine learning models alongside the data. Of those, running spark data engineering pipelines on managed clusters and building a lakehouse over data in cloud object storage are not what Pachyderm is typically brought in for.
- What can Databricks do that Pachyderm cannot?
- Databricks covers Delta Lake, Apache Spark, MLflow, Unity Catalog. Pachyderm covers Data versioning, Data-driven pipelines, Automatic provenance, Kubernetes-native.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Databricks vs AWS SageMaker
- Databricks vs Google Vertex AI
- Databricks vs Azure Machine Learning
- Databricks vs DataRobot
- Databricks vs Snowflake
- Databricks vs TensorFlow
- Databricks vs Comet ML
- Databricks vs Keras
- Databricks vs MLflow
- Databricks vs Jupyter
- Databricks vs PyTorch
- Databricks vs scikit-learn
- Databricks vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Databricks vs Weights & Biases
- Databricks vs Alteryx
- Databricks vs Anaconda
- Databricks vs Dataiku
- Databricks vs DVC
- Pachyderm vs AWS SageMaker
- Pachyderm vs Google Vertex AI
- Pachyderm vs Azure Machine Learning
- Pachyderm vs DataRobot
- Pachyderm vs Snowflake
- Pachyderm vs TensorFlow
- Pachyderm vs Comet ML
- Pachyderm vs Keras
- Pachyderm vs MLflow
- Pachyderm vs Jupyter
- Pachyderm vs PyTorch
- Pachyderm vs scikit-learn
- Pachyderm vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Pachyderm vs Weights & Biases
- Pachyderm vs Alteryx
- Pachyderm vs Anaconda
- Pachyderm vs Dataiku
- Pachyderm vs DVC
