CRM & Sales · head to head
Clay vs Play.ht
The short version
- Only Play.ht has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Clay two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently; Play.ht the vendor's own pricing FAQ as captured by the Internet Archive on 20 January 2022 states words do not roll over between subscription cycles and reset each renewal, that payments already made are non-refundable, and that running out of words requires a separate one-time purchase; no dollar figures appear in this capture but the mechanism is stated plainly by the vendor
- They diverge on capability: Clay covers Data enrichment, Play.ht covers 900+ voices.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clay and Play.ht actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clay
- Data enrichment
- Contact management
- Workflow automation
- Integration
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Zapier
- Slack
Only in Play.ht
- 900+ voices
- 142 languages
- Voice cloning
- Real-time streaming
- WordPress plugin
- Podcast hosting
- Api support
Both cover
- API access
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clay
- Enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one tablenot Play.ht
- Building automated outbound research and outreach workflowsnot Play.ht
Play.ht
- ai tools managementnot Clay
- Workflow automationnot Clay
- Reportingnot Clay
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clay
- Two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
- Data credit overage is sold at a 30% premium over the plan rate, so exceeding the allowance costs more per unit than planning for it
- The free plan allows 500 actions, 100 data credits and 200 rows per table
- The entry paid plan starts at $167 a month, and both paid prices are starting figures rather than fixed
- The free plan cannot buy overage at all, so hitting the limit stops work rather than billing for it
Play.ht
- The vendor's own pricing FAQ as captured by the Internet Archive on 20 January 2022 states words do not roll over between subscription cycles and reset each renewal, that payments already made are non-refundable, and that running out of words requires a separate one-time purchase; no dollar figures appear in this capture but the mechanism is stated plainly by the vendor
Pricing, plan by plan
Clay
On request- Pricing upon request$undefined/month
- Data enrichment
- Integration
- Support
Play.ht
Free- FreeFree
- 2,500 words/month
- Standard voices
- Creator$31/month
- Unlimited words
- Voice cloning
- Pro$99/month
- Commercial license
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose Play.ht if
- You need 900+ voices.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want 142 languages.
Questions people ask
- Is Clay or Play.ht better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clay starts at On request and Play.ht at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clay or Play.ht?
- Play.ht has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Clay and Free for Play.ht.
- Does Clay or Play.ht run on more platforms?
- Clay runs on Web. Play.ht runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Play.ht for free?
- Yes. Play.ht has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Clay starts at On request.
- What is Clay best used for?
- Clay is most often used for enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table, building automated outbound research and outreach workflows. Of those, enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table and building automated outbound research and outreach workflows are not what Play.ht is typically brought in for.
- What can Clay do that Play.ht cannot?
- Clay covers Data enrichment, Contact management, Workflow automation, Integration. Play.ht covers 900+ voices, 142 languages, Voice cloning, Real-time streaming. Both handle API access, Web support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clay vs Outreach
- Clay vs Gong
- Clay vs Seismic
- Clay vs Pipedrive
- Clay vs HubSpot
- Clay vs Salesforce
- Clay vs Bitrix24
- Clay vs Capsule
- Clay vs Clari
- Clay vs Freshsales
- Clay vs Streak
- Clay vs Zoho CRM
- Clay vs Affinity
- Clay vs Agile CRM
- Clay vs Apollo.io
- Clay vs Capsule CRM
- Clay vs Clearbit
- Clay vs Cloze
- Clay vs Pika
- Clay vs Anthropic API
- Clay vs D-ID
- Clay vs Fathom
- Clay vs Stable Diffusion
- Clay vs AI21 Labs
- Clay vs ChatGPT
- Clay vs Copy.ai
- Clay vs HeyGen
- Clay vs Jasper
- Clay vs Leonardo AI
- Clay vs Murf
- Clay vs Perplexity
- Clay vs Pi
- Clay vs Replicate
- Clay vs Replika
- Clay vs Rytr
- Clay vs Together AI
- Play.ht vs Outreach
- Play.ht vs Gong
- Play.ht vs Seismic
- Play.ht vs Pipedrive
- Play.ht vs HubSpot
- Play.ht vs Salesforce
- Play.ht vs Bitrix24
- Play.ht vs Capsule
- Play.ht vs Clari
- Play.ht vs Freshsales
- Play.ht vs Streak
- Play.ht vs Zoho CRM
- Play.ht vs Affinity
- Play.ht vs Agile CRM
- Play.ht vs Apollo.io
- Play.ht vs Capsule CRM
- Play.ht vs Clearbit
- Play.ht vs Cloze
- Play.ht vs Pika
- Play.ht vs Anthropic API
- Play.ht vs D-ID
- Play.ht vs Fathom
- Play.ht vs Stable Diffusion
- Play.ht vs AI21 Labs
- Play.ht vs ChatGPT
- Play.ht vs Copy.ai
- Play.ht vs HeyGen
- Play.ht vs Jasper
- Play.ht vs Leonardo AI
- Play.ht vs Murf
- Play.ht vs Perplexity
- Play.ht vs Pi
- Play.ht vs Replicate
- Play.ht vs Replika
- Play.ht vs Rytr
- Play.ht vs Together AI

