Softwr

CRM & Sales · head to head

Clay vs Play.ht

Clay logo

Clay

CRM & Sales

Data platform for sales teams

From
On request
Rated
-
P

Play.ht

AI Tools

Ultra-realistic AI voice generator

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Play.ht has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Clay two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently; Play.ht the vendor's own pricing FAQ as captured by the Internet Archive on 20 January 2022 states words do not roll over between subscription cycles and reset each renewal, that payments already made are non-refundable, and that running out of words requires a separate one-time purchase; no dollar figures appear in this capture but the mechanism is stated plainly by the vendor
  • They diverge on capability: Clay covers Data enrichment, Play.ht covers 900+ voices.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Clay and Play.ht actually diverge.

Attributes where Clay and Play.ht differ
AttributeClayPlay.ht
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelquotefreemium
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWebWeb, Api
CategoryCRM & SalesAI Tools
Founded20212014

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Clay

  • Data enrichment
  • Contact management
  • Workflow automation
  • Integration
  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • Zapier
  • Slack

Only in Play.ht

  • 900+ voices
  • 142 languages
  • Voice cloning
  • Real-time streaming
  • WordPress plugin
  • Podcast hosting
  • Api support

Both cover

  • API access
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Clay

  • Enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one tablenot Play.ht
  • Building automated outbound research and outreach workflowsnot Play.ht

Play.ht

  • ai tools managementnot Clay
  • Workflow automationnot Clay
  • Reportingnot Clay

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Clay

  • Two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
  • Data credit overage is sold at a 30% premium over the plan rate, so exceeding the allowance costs more per unit than planning for it
  • The free plan allows 500 actions, 100 data credits and 200 rows per table
  • The entry paid plan starts at $167 a month, and both paid prices are starting figures rather than fixed
  • The free plan cannot buy overage at all, so hitting the limit stops work rather than billing for it

Play.ht

  • The vendor's own pricing FAQ as captured by the Internet Archive on 20 January 2022 states words do not roll over between subscription cycles and reset each renewal, that payments already made are non-refundable, and that running out of words requires a separate one-time purchase; no dollar figures appear in this capture but the mechanism is stated plainly by the vendor

Pricing, plan by plan

Clay

On request
  • Pricing upon request$undefined/month
    • Data enrichment
    • Integration
    • Support

Play.ht

Free
  • FreeFree
    • 2,500 words/month
    • Standard voices
  • Creator$31/month
    • Unlimited words
    • Voice cloning
  • Pro$99/month
    • Commercial license
    • API access

Which should you pick?

Choose Clay if

  • You need data enrichment.
  • You also want contact management.

Choose Play.ht if

  • You need 900+ voices.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want 142 languages.

Questions people ask

Is Clay or Play.ht better?
Neither clearly leads. Clay starts at On request and Play.ht at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Clay or Play.ht?
Play.ht has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Clay and Free for Play.ht.
Does Clay or Play.ht run on more platforms?
Clay runs on Web. Play.ht runs on Web, Api.
Can I use Play.ht for free?
Yes. Play.ht has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Clay starts at On request.
What is Clay best used for?
Clay is most often used for enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table, building automated outbound research and outreach workflows. Of those, enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table and building automated outbound research and outreach workflows are not what Play.ht is typically brought in for.
What can Clay do that Play.ht cannot?
Clay covers Data enrichment, Contact management, Workflow automation, Integration. Play.ht covers 900+ voices, 142 languages, Voice cloning, Real-time streaming. Both handle API access, Web support.

Related pages

Other head to heads