Softwr

Software · head to head

Clay vs HeyGen

Clay logo

Clay

Software

Data platform for sales teams

From
On request
Rated
-
HeyGen logo

HeyGen

Software

AI video generation with realistic avatars

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only HeyGen has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Clay two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently; HeyGen avatar movements feel unnatural in longer videos and repetitive with limited emotional expression, appearing stiff and robotic after 60 seconds
  • They diverge on capability: Clay covers Data enrichment, HeyGen covers AI avatars.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Clay and HeyGen actually diverge.

Attributes where Clay and HeyGen differ
AttributeClayHeyGen
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelquoteUnknown
Free tierNoYes
Founded20212020

Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Clay

  • Data enrichment
  • Contact management
  • Workflow automation
  • Integration
  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • Slack
  • GDPR

Only in HeyGen

  • AI avatars
  • Text-to-video
  • Voice cloning
  • Video translation
  • CRM integrations
  • Api support

Both cover

  • API access
  • Zapier
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Clay

  • Enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one tablenot HeyGen
  • Building automated outbound research and outreach workflowsnot HeyGen

HeyGen

  • ai tools managementnot Clay
  • Workflow automationnot Clay
  • Reportingnot Clay

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Clay

  • Two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
  • Data credit overage is sold at a 30% premium over the plan rate, so exceeding the allowance costs more per unit than planning for it
  • The free plan allows 500 actions, 100 data credits and 200 rows per table
  • The entry paid plan starts at $167 a month, and both paid prices are starting figures rather than fixed
  • The free plan cannot buy overage at all, so hitting the limit stops work rather than billing for it

HeyGen

  • Avatar movements feel unnatural in longer videos and repetitive with limited emotional expression, appearing stiff and robotic after 60 seconds
  • Cannot reliably choreograph natural interactions like walking through a room, using devices, or drinking from objects
  • Billing gap between marketed unlimited plans and actual credit consumption is highest complaint with lost credits on failed renders
  • Inconsistent lip sync and voice quality with slow processing and occasional moderation blocks without explanation
  • Customer support described as non-existent with no way to complain or reach a human representative

Pricing, plan by plan

Clay

On request
  • Pricing upon request$undefined/month
    • Data enrichment
    • Integration
    • Support

HeyGen

Free
  • FreeFree
    • 3 videos
    • With watermark
  • Creator$29/month
    • Unlimited videos
    • 200 monthly credits
  • Pro$99/month
    • 2,000 credits
    • Advanced features

Which should you pick?

Choose Clay if

  • You need data enrichment.
  • You also want contact management.

Choose HeyGen if

  • You need ai avatars.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want text-to-video.

Questions people ask

Is Clay or HeyGen better?
Neither clearly leads. Clay starts at On request and HeyGen at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Clay or HeyGen?
HeyGen has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Clay and Free for HeyGen.
Does Clay or HeyGen run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
Can I use HeyGen for free?
Yes. HeyGen has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Clay starts at On request.
What is Clay best used for?
Clay is most often used for enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table, building automated outbound research and outreach workflows. Of those, enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table and building automated outbound research and outreach workflows are not what HeyGen is typically brought in for.
What can Clay do that HeyGen cannot?
Clay covers Data enrichment, Contact management, Workflow automation, Integration. HeyGen covers AI avatars, Text-to-video, Voice cloning, Video translation. Both handle API access, Zapier, Web support.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

HeyGen: What are HeyGen's pricing plans?

HeyGen offers Free ($0, 3 videos/month with watermark), Creator ($29/month, unlimited videos + 200 monthly credits), Pro ($99/month, more credits), Business ($149/month + $20/seat, 4K rendering), and custom Enterprise pricing.

Source
HeyGen: How does HeyGen's credit system work?

HeyGen uses a credit-based system where Avatar IV video costs 20 credits per minute, video translation costs 5-10 credits per minute. Creator includes 200 credits/month, Pro includes 2,000 credits/month, and Business shares 1,000 credits across the workspace.

Source
HeyGen: What is Digital Twin and how much does it cost?

Digital Twin creates a custom avatar from 2 minutes of recorded footage. Additional avatar slots beyond the default cost $29/month each.

Source
HeyGen: How many languages can HeyGen translate videos into?

HeyGen can translate videos into 175+ languages with AI lip sync, making it useful for global content distribution and localization.

Source
HeyGen: What do users say about HeyGen's ratings?

HeyGen has 4.8/5 on G2 across more than 1,000 reviews and 4.7/5 on Capterra across 313 verified reviews as of June 2026, with avatar quality scoring 9.2/10.

Related pages

Other head to heads