Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Frappe

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Frappe
Developer Tools
The Python web framework behind ERPNext, sold as managed hosting through Frappe Cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Frappe the framework is strongly opinionated: its own ORM, templating and job queue mean general Python and Django experience transfers only partly, and onboarding a new developer takes weeks rather than days.
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, Frappe covers DocType modelling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Frappe actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Frappe |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | Per month by site or server |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Web, Linux, Docker |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Frappe
- DocType modelling
- Role and field permissions
- Built-in REST API
- Background jobs
- Bench CLI
- Frappe Cloud hosting
- App marketplace
- Multi-tenancy
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Frappe
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Frappe
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Frappe
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Frappe
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Frappe
Frappe
- A team building an internal business application that needs permissions, audit trail and an API on day one rather than in month threenot Chainguard
- An ERPNext user who wants managed hosting, automatic updates and offsite backups without hiring a systems administratornot Chainguard
- An Indian or emerging-market business that wants to pay for application hosting in local currency at local price pointsnot Chainguard
- A consultancy shipping custom vertical apps to clients on a shared framework with per-client site isolationnot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Frappe
- The framework is strongly opinionated: its own ORM, templating and job queue mean general Python and Django experience transfers only partly, and onboarding a new developer takes weeks rather than days.
- The developer pool is small and heavily concentrated in India, so hiring Frappe experience elsewhere is slow and expensive relative to mainstream stacks.
- Documentation is uneven in depth and lags behind releases in places, so real answers often come from reading the source or the community forum.
- Major version upgrades of the framework have historically broken custom apps that reach past the DocType layer, so bespoke code carries a recurring maintenance cost at each upgrade.
- Frappe Cloud recommends against its cheapest Hetzner-backed option for mission-critical production, so the headline $5 entry price is not the price of a production-grade deployment.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Frappe
Free- Framework, self-hostedFree
- MIT licensed, no licence fee
- Install with bench on your own Linux servers
- You carry updates, backups and security patching
- Frappe Cloud Sites$5/month
- Also listed at ₹410 per month
- Shared servers with 150+ installable apps
- Automatic updates and offsite backups
- Frappe Cloud Servers$40/month
- Also listed at ₹3,600 per month
- Dedicated or shared virtual machines
- Unlimited sites on your server
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose Frappe if
- You need doctype modelling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
- You also want role and field permissions.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Frappe better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Frappe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Frappe?
- Chainguard starts at Free and Frappe at Free.
- Does Chainguard or Frappe run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Frappe runs on Web, Linux, Docker.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Frappe is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Frappe cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. Frappe covers DocType modelling, Role and field permissions, Built-in REST API, Background jobs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceFrappe: Is Frappe the same as ERPNext?
No. Frappe is the framework; ERPNext is the ERP application written on it. You can run Frappe without ERPNext to build your own applications.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceFrappe: What licence is the framework under?
MIT, which is permissive and imposes no obligation to publish your changes, unlike the AGPL used by several open source ERP rivals.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceFrappe: Can I pay in rupees?
Yes. Frappe Cloud publishes the same plans in Indian rupees, ₹410 a month for sites and ₹3,600 for servers, rather than converting a dollar price at checkout.
Frappe: Do I have to use Frappe Cloud?
No, self-hosting with bench or Docker is fully supported and free. Frappe Cloud is a convenience purchase, and it funds the open source work.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Pants Build
- Chainguard vs Helix
- Chainguard vs Jitsu
- Chainguard vs Steampipe
- Chainguard vs Tilt
- Chainguard vs Backstage
- Chainguard vs Visual Studio Code
- Chainguard vs Penpot
- Chainguard vs GNU Emacs
- Chainguard vs Bazel
- Chainguard vs Eclipse IDE
- Chainguard vs Swagger UI
- Chainguard vs Daytona
- Chainguard vs Depot
- Chainguard vs Earthly
- Chainguard vs Harness
- Chainguard vs Moonrepo
- Frappe vs Snyk
- Frappe vs Trivy
- Frappe vs Doppler
- Frappe vs Infisical
- Frappe vs Grype
- Frappe vs Arnica
- Frappe vs HashiCorp Vault
- Frappe vs Bitwarden
- Frappe vs Semgrep
- Frappe vs Authelia
- Frappe vs Endor Labs
- Frappe vs Tenable
- Frappe vs Hanwha Vision
- Frappe vs Idira
- Frappe vs IVPN
- Frappe vs Logto
- Frappe vs Malwarebytes
- Frappe vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Frappe vs Pants Build
- Frappe vs Helix
- Frappe vs Jitsu
- Frappe vs Steampipe
- Frappe vs Tilt
- Frappe vs Backstage
- Frappe vs Visual Studio Code
- Frappe vs Penpot
- Frappe vs GNU Emacs
- Frappe vs Bazel
- Frappe vs Eclipse IDE
- Frappe vs Swagger UI
- Frappe vs Daytona
- Frappe vs Depot
- Frappe vs Earthly
- Frappe vs Harness
- Frappe vs Moonrepo
