Developer Tools · head to head
Sourcegraph vs Trivy

Sourcegraph
Developer Tools
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Free plan
- No

Trivy
Cybersecurity
Open-source vulnerability and misconfiguration scanner
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Trivy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams; Trivy reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sourcegraph and Trivy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Sourcegraph | Trivy |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $16000/year | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Cloud, Self-hosted | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sourcegraph
Nothing recorded that Trivy does not also cover.
Only in Trivy
- Multi-target scanning
- Vulnerability detection
- Misconfiguration checks
- Secret detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Trivy
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Trivy
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Trivy
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Trivy
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Trivy
Trivy
- Failing a pull request when a container image introduces a known CVEnot Sourcegraph
- Scanning Terraform and Kubernetes manifests for misconfiguration before applynot Sourcegraph
- Catching committed secrets as part of an existing CI stepnot Sourcegraph
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Trivy
- Reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- No built-in triage or exception workflow, so suppressing accepted risk is managed in config files
- Findings are point-in-time from CI, with no continuous runtime monitoring unless you add the commercial platform
Pricing, plan by plan
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16000/year
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Trivy
Free- TrivyFree
- Full scanner
- Unlimited scans
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Trivy if
- You need multi-target scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want vulnerability detection.
Questions people ask
- Is Sourcegraph or Trivy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year and Trivy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sourcegraph or Trivy?
- Trivy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $16000/year for Sourcegraph and Free for Trivy.
- Does Sourcegraph or Trivy run on more platforms?
- Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted. Trivy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Trivy for free?
- Yes. Trivy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
- What is Sourcegraph best used for?
- Sourcegraph is most often used for large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositories, enterprise governance and code ownership tracking, ai-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detection, onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebases. Of those, large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositories and enterprise governance and code ownership tracking are not what Trivy is typically brought in for.
- What can Sourcegraph do that Trivy cannot?
- Trivy covers Multi-target scanning, Vulnerability detection, Misconfiguration checks, Secret detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Trivy: Is Trivy free?
Yes, open source from Aqua Security with no licence fee. Aqua sells a commercial platform around it.
Trivy: What can Trivy scan?
Container images, filesystems, Git repositories, Kubernetes clusters and infrastructure-as-code, for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets and licences.
Trivy: Does Trivy need a server?
No. It is a single binary, which is a large part of why it became a default in CI.
Related pages
More on Sourcegraph
Other head to heads
- Sourcegraph vs Visual Studio Code
- Sourcegraph vs ESLint
- Sourcegraph vs pnpm
- Sourcegraph vs Turborepo
- Sourcegraph vs Cody
- Sourcegraph vs Sweep
- Sourcegraph vs Bazel
- Sourcegraph vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph vs Moonrepo
- Sourcegraph vs Nixpacks
- Sourcegraph vs Pieces for Developers
- Sourcegraph vs Rust
- Sourcegraph vs Fig
- Sourcegraph vs Frappe
- Sourcegraph vs Git
- Sourcegraph vs GoLand
- Sourcegraph vs Hookdeck
- Sourcegraph vs JFrog Artifactory
- Sourcegraph vs Grype
- Sourcegraph vs Snyk
- Sourcegraph vs Chainguard
- Sourcegraph vs Semgrep
- Sourcegraph vs Bitwarden
- Sourcegraph vs Infisical
- Sourcegraph vs Authelia
- Sourcegraph vs Ory Kratos
- Sourcegraph vs HashiCorp Vault
- Sourcegraph vs Arnica
- Sourcegraph vs OWASP ZAP
- Sourcegraph vs Proton Mail
- Sourcegraph vs Veriff
- Sourcegraph vs Brave Browser
- Sourcegraph vs March Networks
- Sourcegraph vs Salient CompleteView
- Sourcegraph vs Sumsub
- Sourcegraph vs Syft
- Trivy vs Visual Studio Code
- Trivy vs ESLint
- Trivy vs pnpm
- Trivy vs Turborepo
- Trivy vs Cody
- Trivy vs Sweep
- Trivy vs Bazel
- Trivy vs GitHub Copilot
- Trivy vs Moonrepo
- Trivy vs Nixpacks
- Trivy vs Pieces for Developers
- Trivy vs Rust
- Trivy vs Fig
- Trivy vs Frappe
- Trivy vs Git
- Trivy vs GoLand
- Trivy vs Hookdeck
- Trivy vs JFrog Artifactory
- Trivy vs Grype
- Trivy vs Snyk
- Trivy vs Chainguard
- Trivy vs Semgrep
- Trivy vs Bitwarden
- Trivy vs Infisical
- Trivy vs Authelia
- Trivy vs Ory Kratos
- Trivy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Trivy vs Arnica
- Trivy vs OWASP ZAP
- Trivy vs Proton Mail
- Trivy vs Veriff
- Trivy vs Brave Browser
- Trivy vs March Networks
- Trivy vs Salient CompleteView
- Trivy vs Sumsub
- Trivy vs Syft
