File Storage · head to head
Carbonite vs Cloudian

Carbonite
File Storage
Simple and reliable cloud backup for businesses
- From
- $6/month
- Rated
- -

Cloudian
File Storage
S3-compatible on-premises object storage with object lock immutability
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Carbonite upload speeds are significantly slower than competitors due to lack of block-level algorithms and multithreading; Cloudian you operate the hardware, so capacity planning, firmware, node failures and a refresh cycle every five years return as costs that a public cloud bill hides.
- They diverge on capability: Carbonite covers Automatic backup, Cloudian covers S3 API compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Carbonite and Cloudian actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (File Storage).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Carbonite
- Automatic backup
- Continuous protection
- Remote file access
- Bare metal restore
- Encryption
- Compliance support
- Microsoft 365
- Windows Server
Only in Cloudian
- S3 API compatibility
- Object Lock
- Erasure coding
- Multi-tenancy
- Hybrid tiering
- HyperStore appliances
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Carbonite
- Data protectionnot Cloudian
- Disaster recoverynot Cloudian
- Business continuitynot Cloudian
- Ransomware protectionnot Cloudian
- Compliancenot Cloudian
Cloudian
- A backup team needing an immutable target so a compromised administrator account cannot delete the backupsnot Carbonite
- An organisation restoring hundreds of terabytes regularly where public cloud egress charges make cloud storage untenablenot Carbonite
- A university or government body with data residency rules preventing use of public cloud object storagenot Carbonite
- A media archive holding petabytes of finished content where per-terabyte capital cost beats per-gigabyte monthly cloud feesnot Carbonite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Carbonite
- Upload speeds are significantly slower than competitors due to lack of block-level algorithms and multithreading
- Bandwidth throttling control is limited, preventing users from managing full bandwidth allocation
- Mobile apps and web access are more limited than sync-first services like Dropbox or Google Drive
- Uses AES-128 encryption instead of industry-standard AES-256
- Hybrid backup support is restricted to professional plans, unavailable for personal users
Cloudian
- You operate the hardware, so capacity planning, firmware, node failures and a refresh cycle every five years return as costs that a public cloud bill hides.
- Per-terabyte licensing plus servers means high upfront cost, and the crossover point against public cloud only arrives at meaningful scale, typically hundreds of terabytes and up.
- S3 compatibility is high but not identical to Amazon, so occasional applications depending on newer or less common S3 features need testing rather than assumption.
- Small deployments need a minimum node count for erasure coding to be meaningful, which sets a practical floor on entry cost regardless of how little data you have.
- Performance is object storage performance, so it is not a substitute for block or high-throughput file storage and buyers occasionally deploy it for the wrong workload.
Pricing, plan by plan
Carbonite
$6/month- Basic$6/month
- Automatic backup
- Unlimited cloud storage
- Easy restore
Cloudian
On request- Cloudian HyperStore$undefined/year
- Licensed per usable terabyte, subscription or perpetual
- Software-only on your hardware or as Cloudian appliances
- No egress or API request charges
Which should you pick?
Choose Carbonite if
- You need automatic backup.
- You work on Windows, Mac, Web.
- You also want continuous protection.
Choose Cloudian if
- You need s3 api compatibility.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want object lock.
Questions people ask
- Is Carbonite or Cloudian better?
- Neither clearly leads. Carbonite starts at $6/month and Cloudian at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Carbonite or Cloudian?
- Carbonite starts at $6/month and Cloudian at On request.
- Does Carbonite or Cloudian run on more platforms?
- Carbonite runs on Windows, Mac, Web. Cloudian runs on Linux.
- What is Carbonite best used for?
- Carbonite is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what Cloudian is typically brought in for.
- What can Carbonite do that Cloudian cannot?
- Carbonite covers Automatic backup, Continuous protection, Remote file access, Bare metal restore. Cloudian covers S3 API compatibility, Object Lock, Erasure coding, Multi-tenancy.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Carbonite: Does Carbonite offer unlimited storage?
Yes, Carbonite's personal plans (Safe Basic through Safe Server Ultimate) offer unlimited cloud storage, though business plans have tiered storage starting at 250 GB.
SourceCloudian: Does object lock really stop ransomware deleting backups?
Within the retention period, yes, provided the lock is set in compliance mode. That is precisely why it is the common answer to backup-targeting ransomware.
Carbonite: What is Carbonite's pricing?
Personal plans range from $4.91 to $83.33 per month with annual billing. Business plans start around $50-$75 per endpoint annually, with volume discounts available for multi-year contracts.
SourceCloudian: Are there egress charges?
No. That is the central cost argument against public cloud object storage, and it only becomes visible when you have to restore at volume.
Carbonite: How fast are Carbonite's upload speeds?
Carbonite's upload speeds are notably slow and are consistently identified as the platform's main weakness. The lack of block-level algorithms and multithreading contributes to these speed limitations.
SourceCloudian: Can we use our own servers?
Yes, HyperStore is software-defined and runs on qualified commodity hardware, or you can buy Cloudian appliances if you would rather not certify your own.
Carbonite: What encryption does Carbonite use?
Carbonite uses AES-128 encryption at rest, which is an unusual choice in 2026 when AES-256 is the industry standard.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Carbonite vs Backblaze
- Carbonite vs Duplicati
- Carbonite vs CrashPlan
- Carbonite vs Zerto
- Carbonite vs Arq Backup
- Carbonite vs TrueNAS
- Carbonite vs Box
- Carbonite vs IDrive
- Carbonite vs Tresorit
- Carbonite vs Veritas NetBackup
- Carbonite vs Barracuda Backup
- Carbonite vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Carbonite vs Sync.com
- Carbonite vs Tigris
- Carbonite vs VAST Data
- Carbonite vs MinIO
- Carbonite vs IDrive e2
- Carbonite vs Scality RING
- Carbonite vs Storj
- Carbonite vs Cloudflare R2
- Carbonite vs Panzura
- Carbonite vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Carbonite vs Ceph
- Cloudian vs Backblaze
- Cloudian vs Duplicati
- Cloudian vs CrashPlan
- Cloudian vs Zerto
- Cloudian vs Arq Backup
- Cloudian vs TrueNAS
- Cloudian vs Box
- Cloudian vs IDrive
- Cloudian vs Tresorit
- Cloudian vs Veritas NetBackup
- Cloudian vs Barracuda Backup
- Cloudian vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Cloudian vs Sync.com
- Cloudian vs Tigris
- Cloudian vs VAST Data
- Cloudian vs MinIO
- Cloudian vs IDrive e2
- Cloudian vs Scality RING
- Cloudian vs Storj
- Cloudian vs Cloudflare R2
- Cloudian vs Panzura
- Cloudian vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Cloudian vs Ceph
