Cloud · head to head
CapRover vs Proxmox Backup Server

CapRover
Cloud
Free self-hosted platform built on Docker Swarm with a dashboard and automatic certificates
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Proxmox Backup Server
Backup
Deduplicating backup server for virtual machines, containers and Linux hosts, with verification built in
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CapRover since June 2026 one pseudonymous account wrote 97 of roughly 100 commits and the next human contributor wrote one, so there is no identifiable person or company to contract with, escalate to or hold responsible.; Proxmox Backup Server there is no Windows client, so physical Windows machines must be backed up by something else and the estate ends up with two backup products.
- They diverge on capability: CapRover covers One-click applications, Proxmox Backup Server covers Deduplicated chunk store.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CapRover and Proxmox Backup Server actually diverge.
| Attribute | CapRover | Proxmox Backup Server |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted | Linux |
| Category | Cloud | Backup |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CapRover
- One-click applications
- Automatic certificates
- Web dashboard
- Multiple deploy paths
- Docker Swarm clustering
- Custom nginx configuration
Only in Proxmox Backup Server
- Deduplicated chunk store
- Incremental guest backups
- Client side encryption
- Verification jobs
- Remote sync
- Live restore and file level restore
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CapRover
- Running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificatesnot Proxmox Backup Server
- A two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one boxnot Proxmox Backup Server
- Standing up one-click databases and internal tools without writing Compose filesnot Proxmox Backup Server
- Hosting client demos cheaply where downtime is inconvenient rather than expensivenot Proxmox Backup Server
Proxmox Backup Server
- Backing up a Proxmox VE cluster with incremental block level backups of running guestsnot CapRover
- Replacing a backup product whose licence is priced per socket or per terabyte on a virtualisation estatenot CapRover
- Proving backup integrity on a schedule rather than discovering corruption during a restorenot CapRover
- Keeping an encrypted second copy on a remote server or on tape without a third party servicenot CapRover
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CapRover
- Since June 2026 one pseudonymous account wrote 97 of roughly 100 commits and the next human contributor wrote one, so there is no identifiable person or company to contract with, escalate to or hold responsible.
- Donations over the last twelve months totalled 285 US dollars and there is no commercial tier, so no paid support exists at any price and no maintenance commitment is funded.
- The LICENSE file is Apache 2.0 with a superseding appendix that bans redistributing a paid version and refers to paid features that do not yet exist, and GitHub cannot classify it, so the terms already anticipate a commercial change of direction.
- Releases arrive in bursts with an eleven month gap between September 2023 and August 2024 and two further gaps of about six months since, so there is no basis for assuming a security fix will land promptly.
- The backup feature is documented as experimental, covers only the CapRover configuration directory and explicitly excludes persistent volumes and container images, so every database has to be dumped separately with its container stopped.
Proxmox Backup Server
- There is no Windows client, so physical Windows machines must be backed up by something else and the estate ends up with two backup products.
- The datastore is millions of small chunk files, so it needs storage with real input and output capability and performs poorly on a single spinning disk or an SMB or NFS share.
- Deduplication is per datastore, so splitting workloads across datastores for retention or tenancy reasons multiplies the storage those workloads consume.
- Garbage collection depends on file access time semantics on the underlying filesystem, so a datastore mounted with the wrong options can fail to reclaim space or, worse, behave unpredictably.
- Subscriptions are priced per CPU socket per year, so a backup server consolidated onto fewer larger dual socket machines pays twice per host for the supported repository.
Pricing, plan by plan
CapRover
Free- CapRoverFree
- No paid tier and no hosted offering
- Unlimited applications, servers and users
- Community support through Slack and GitHub
Proxmox Backup Server
Free- No subscriptionFree
- Full functionality with no capacity limit
- Community package repository
- Community forum support
- Subscription$undefined/year
- Priced per CPU socket per year
- Access to the enterprise package repository
- Vendor support tickets
Which should you pick?
Choose CapRover if
- You need one-click applications.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted.
- You also want automatic certificates.
Choose Proxmox Backup Server if
- You need deduplicated chunk store.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want incremental guest backups.
Questions people ask
- Is CapRover or Proxmox Backup Server better?
- Neither clearly leads. CapRover starts at Free and Proxmox Backup Server at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CapRover or Proxmox Backup Server?
- CapRover starts at Free and Proxmox Backup Server at Free.
- Does CapRover or Proxmox Backup Server run on more platforms?
- CapRover runs on Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted. Proxmox Backup Server runs on Linux.
- Can I use CapRover for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CapRover best used for?
- CapRover is most often used for running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificates, a two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one box, standing up one-click databases and internal tools without writing compose files, hosting client demos cheaply where downtime is inconvenient rather than expensive. Of those, running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificates and a two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one box are not what Proxmox Backup Server is typically brought in for.
- What can CapRover do that Proxmox Backup Server cannot?
- CapRover covers One-click applications, Automatic certificates, Web dashboard, Multiple deploy paths. Proxmox Backup Server covers Deduplicated chunk store, Incremental guest backups, Client side encryption, Verification jobs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CapRover: Does CapRover cost anything?
No. There is no paid tier and no hosted version. The only income is donations, which came to 285 US dollars over the last twelve months.
Proxmox Backup Server: Can it back up machines that are not on Proxmox?
Linux hosts yes, through the client, at file level. Other hypervisors and physical Windows machines are outside its scope.
CapRover: Is the licence really Apache 2.0?
Not quite. The LICENSE file is Apache 2.0 plus an appendix that supersedes it in case of conflict, forbidding modification of paid features and redistribution of a paid version. GitHub does not recognise the result as a standard licence.
Proxmox Backup Server: Is a subscription required?
No. Without one you use the community repository and forum support. The subscription buys the tested enterprise repository and vendor tickets.
CapRover: Does the backup feature protect my databases?
No. It backs up the CapRover configuration directory only and explicitly excludes persistent directories and container images. You have to dump each database yourself with the container stopped.
Proxmox Backup Server: How do I know a backup will restore?
Run verification jobs. They re-read the stored chunks and mark snapshots verified or failed, which is stronger evidence than a successful backup log.
CapRover: Can I move off Docker Swarm later?
Not without rebuilding. CapRover is architecturally tied to Swarm, so outgrowing it means migrating applications to a different platform rather than switching a scheduler.
Proxmox Backup Server: What storage should the datastore be on?
Local disks, ideally with ZFS and enough input and output capacity for many small files. Network shares are supported but routinely disappointing.
Related pages
More on Proxmox Backup Server
Other head to heads
- CapRover vs Render
- CapRover vs K3s
- CapRover vs DigitalOcean
- CapRover vs Coolify
- CapRover vs Dokku
- CapRover vs Qovery
- CapRover vs Porter
- CapRover vs Railway
- CapRover vs Fly.io
- CapRover vs Northflank
- CapRover vs SST
- CapRover vs Heroku
- CapRover vs Jaeger
- CapRover vs Lambda
- CapRover vs Linode
- CapRover vs Longhorn
- CapRover vs minikube
- CapRover vs Bacula
- CapRover vs Kopia
- CapRover vs rustic
- CapRover vs UrBackup
- CapRover vs Borg Backup
- CapRover vs Duplicacy
- CapRover vs BDRShield
- CapRover vs HPE StoreOnce
- CapRover vs HYCU
- CapRover vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- CapRover vs Portworx Backup
- CapRover vs Velero
- CapRover vs Apple Time Machine
- CapRover vs Arcserve UDP
- CapRover vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- CapRover vs Axcient x360Recover
- CapRover vs Bacula Enterprise
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Render
- Proxmox Backup Server vs K3s
- Proxmox Backup Server vs DigitalOcean
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Coolify
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Dokku
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Qovery
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Porter
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Railway
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Fly.io
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Northflank
- Proxmox Backup Server vs SST
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Heroku
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Jaeger
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Lambda
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Linode
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Longhorn
- Proxmox Backup Server vs minikube
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Bacula
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Kopia
- Proxmox Backup Server vs rustic
- Proxmox Backup Server vs UrBackup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Borg Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Duplicacy
- Proxmox Backup Server vs BDRShield
- Proxmox Backup Server vs HPE StoreOnce
- Proxmox Backup Server vs HYCU
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Portworx Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Velero
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Apple Time Machine
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Arcserve UDP
- Proxmox Backup Server vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Axcient x360Recover
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Bacula Enterprise
