Cloud · head to head
CapRover vs Velero

CapRover
Cloud
Free self-hosted platform built on Docker Swarm with a dashboard and automatic certificates
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Velero
Backup
Open source backup and migration for Kubernetes cluster resources
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CapRover since June 2026 one pseudonymous account wrote 97 of roughly 100 commits and the next human contributor wrote one, so there is no identifiable person or company to contract with, escalate to or hold responsible.; Velero there is no vendor support contract from the project itself, so a failed restore during an outage is resolved by your team reading source code and GitHub issues.
- They diverge on capability: CapRover covers One-click applications, Velero covers Cluster resource backup.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CapRover and Velero actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CapRover
- One-click applications
- Automatic certificates
- Web dashboard
- Multiple deploy paths
- Docker Swarm clustering
- Custom nginx configuration
Only in Velero
- Cluster resource backup
- Volume snapshots
- File-level backup
- Cross-cluster restore
- Backup hooks
- Scheduled backups
- Object storage targets
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CapRover
- Running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificatesnot Velero
- A two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one boxnot Velero
- Standing up one-click databases and internal tools without writing Compose filesnot Velero
- Hosting client demos cheaply where downtime is inconvenient rather than expensivenot Velero
Velero
- A platform team needing namespace-level restore after an accidental deletion, with no budget for a backup productnot CapRover
- Migrating workloads between Kubernetes clusters or between cloud providers using backup and restorenot CapRover
- Capturing cluster configuration before a risky upgrade so the previous state can be reinstatednot CapRover
- An organisation proving a Kubernetes recovery capability to an auditor before deciding whether to buy a commercial productnot CapRover
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CapRover
- Since June 2026 one pseudonymous account wrote 97 of roughly 100 commits and the next human contributor wrote one, so there is no identifiable person or company to contract with, escalate to or hold responsible.
- Donations over the last twelve months totalled 285 US dollars and there is no commercial tier, so no paid support exists at any price and no maintenance commitment is funded.
- The LICENSE file is Apache 2.0 with a superseding appendix that bans redistributing a paid version and refers to paid features that do not yet exist, and GitHub cannot classify it, so the terms already anticipate a commercial change of direction.
- Releases arrive in bursts with an eleven month gap between September 2023 and August 2024 and two further gaps of about six months since, so there is no basis for assuming a security fix will land promptly.
- The backup feature is documented as experimental, covers only the CapRover configuration directory and explicitly excludes persistent volumes and container images, so every database has to be dumped separately with its container stopped.
Velero
- There is no vendor support contract from the project itself, so a failed restore during an outage is resolved by your team reading source code and GitHub issues.
- Application consistency depends on backup hooks you write and maintain, and a database backed up without a correct hook restores to a state that may not be usable.
- Restore ordering across dependent resources such as custom resource definitions and operators needs manual attention, and complex applications frequently need a documented runbook rather than a single restore command.
- Corporate engineering investment became uncertain after Broadcom acquired VMware, which is a real consideration for anyone building a long retention policy on the project.
- Object storage egress charges apply on restore and are billed by your cloud provider, so a full cluster recovery from another region carries a cost discovered during the incident rather than during planning.
Pricing, plan by plan
CapRover
Free- CapRoverFree
- No paid tier and no hosted offering
- Unlimited applications, servers and users
- Community support through Slack and GitHub
Velero
Free- VeleroFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed
- No cluster or capacity limits
- Community support via Kubernetes Slack and GitHub
Which should you pick?
Choose CapRover if
- You need one-click applications.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted.
- You also want automatic certificates.
Choose Velero if
- You need cluster resource backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want volume snapshots.
Questions people ask
- Is CapRover or Velero better?
- Neither clearly leads. CapRover starts at Free and Velero at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CapRover or Velero?
- CapRover starts at Free and Velero at Free.
- Does CapRover or Velero run on more platforms?
- CapRover runs on Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted. Velero runs on Linux.
- Can I use CapRover for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CapRover best used for?
- CapRover is most often used for running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificates, a two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one box, standing up one-click databases and internal tools without writing compose files, hosting client demos cheaply where downtime is inconvenient rather than expensive. Of those, running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificates and a two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one box are not what Velero is typically brought in for.
- What can CapRover do that Velero cannot?
- CapRover covers One-click applications, Automatic certificates, Web dashboard, Multiple deploy paths. Velero covers Cluster resource backup, Volume snapshots, File-level backup, Cross-cluster restore.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CapRover: Does CapRover cost anything?
No. There is no paid tier and no hosted version. The only income is donations, which came to 285 US dollars over the last twelve months.
Velero: Can we buy support for Velero?
Not from the project. Several commercial Kubernetes backup products package or extend it and sell support, which is the practical route to an accountable vendor.
CapRover: Is the licence really Apache 2.0?
Not quite. The LICENSE file is Apache 2.0 plus an appendix that supersedes it in case of conflict, forbidding modification of paid features and redistribution of a paid version. GitHub does not recognise the result as a standard licence.
Velero: Does it back up persistent volume data?
Yes, through cloud or Container Storage Interface snapshots, or through file-level upload where snapshots are not available.
CapRover: Does the backup feature protect my databases?
No. It backs up the CapRover configuration directory only and explicitly excludes persistent directories and container images. You have to dump each database yourself with the container stopped.
Velero: What does it cost?
Nothing to licence. You pay for object storage capacity and for egress on restore, both billed by your cloud provider.
CapRover: Can I move off Docker Swarm later?
Not without rebuilding. CapRover is architecturally tied to Swarm, so outgrowing it means migrating applications to a different platform rather than switching a scheduler.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CapRover vs Render
- CapRover vs K3s
- CapRover vs DigitalOcean
- CapRover vs Coolify
- CapRover vs Dokku
- CapRover vs Qovery
- CapRover vs Porter
- CapRover vs Railway
- CapRover vs Fly.io
- CapRover vs Northflank
- CapRover vs SST
- CapRover vs Heroku
- CapRover vs Jaeger
- CapRover vs Lambda
- CapRover vs Linode
- CapRover vs Longhorn
- CapRover vs minikube
- CapRover vs Portworx Backup
- CapRover vs Trilio
- CapRover vs Restic
- CapRover vs HYCU
- CapRover vs UrBackup
- CapRover vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- CapRover vs BDRShield
- CapRover vs Kopia
- CapRover vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- CapRover vs Amanda Enterprise
- CapRover vs Bacula Enterprise
- CapRover vs Borg Backup
- CapRover vs Axcient x360Recover
- CapRover vs Clonezilla
- CapRover vs Clumio
- CapRover vs Cohesity
- Velero vs Render
- Velero vs K3s
- Velero vs DigitalOcean
- Velero vs Coolify
- Velero vs Dokku
- Velero vs Qovery
- Velero vs Porter
- Velero vs Railway
- Velero vs Fly.io
- Velero vs Northflank
- Velero vs SST
- Velero vs Heroku
- Velero vs Jaeger
- Velero vs Lambda
- Velero vs Linode
- Velero vs Longhorn
- Velero vs minikube
- Velero vs Portworx Backup
- Velero vs Trilio
- Velero vs Restic
- Velero vs HYCU
- Velero vs UrBackup
- Velero vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Velero vs BDRShield
- Velero vs Kopia
- Velero vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Velero vs Amanda Enterprise
- Velero vs Bacula Enterprise
- Velero vs Borg Backup
- Velero vs Axcient x360Recover
- Velero vs Clonezilla
- Velero vs Clumio
- Velero vs Cohesity
