Cloud · head to head
Caddy vs UrBackup

UrBackup
Backup
Open source client server backup doing both file and whole disk image backups of Windows machines
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Caddy smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer; UrBackup backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- They diverge on capability: Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS, UrBackup covers Windows image backups.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Caddy and UrBackup actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Caddy
- Automatic HTTPS
- Caddyfile
- Reverse proxy
- Single binary
Only in UrBackup
- Windows image backups
- File backups
- Web interface
- Client discovery
- Internet mode
- Filesystem deduplication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Caddy
- Sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages beforenot UrBackup
- Small deployments where Nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrantsnot UrBackup
- Reverse proxying internal services with TLS without a certificate workflownot UrBackup
UrBackup
- A small office with Windows workstations that needs bare metal restore without per seat licensingnot Caddy
- Schools and labs where machines are re-imaged often and a known good image must be recoverablenot Caddy
- Backing up a mixed fleet to one server on premises with a web interface non specialists can usenot Caddy
- Replacing an expiring commercial endpoint backup licence where the budget is the constraintnot Caddy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Caddy
- Smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer
- Adding plugins means rebuilding the binary rather than loading a module
- Under very high throughput Nginx generally still benchmarks ahead
- Automatic certificate issuance needs outbound internet access, which complicates air-gapped deployments
UrBackup
- Backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- Deduplication relies on filesystem features such as hard links, btrfs or ZFS, so a server built on the wrong filesystem silently consumes far more space and the fix is a rebuild rather than a setting.
- There is no native object storage target, so offsite copies mean replicating the server storage with another tool rather than backing up to a bucket directly.
- Restoring a full Windows image requires booting a restore environment, which is a manual, on site procedure that needs to be rehearsed before the day it is needed.
- A single server holds everything and there is no built in clustering, so its own failure removes every recovery point at once unless you have separately solved replication.
Pricing, plan by plan
Caddy
Free- CaddyFree
- Full functionality
- Commercial use permitted
- Community support
UrBackup
Free- UrBackupFree
- Full functionality, unlimited clients
- File and image backups
- Web administration interface
Which should you pick?
Choose Caddy if
- You need automatic https.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want caddyfile.
Choose UrBackup if
- You need windows image backups.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- You also want file backups.
Questions people ask
- Is Caddy or UrBackup better?
- Neither clearly leads. Caddy starts at Free and UrBackup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Caddy or UrBackup?
- Caddy starts at Free and UrBackup at Free.
- Does Caddy or UrBackup run on more platforms?
- Caddy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker. UrBackup runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- Can I use Caddy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Caddy best used for?
- Caddy is most often used for sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages before, small deployments where nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrants, reverse proxying internal services with tls without a certificate workflow. Of those, sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages before and small deployments where nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrants are not what UrBackup is typically brought in for.
- What can Caddy do that UrBackup cannot?
- Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS, Caddyfile, Reverse proxy, Single binary. UrBackup covers Windows image backups, File backups, Web interface, Client discovery.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Caddy: Is Caddy free?
Yes, open source under the Apache 2.0 licence, free for commercial use.
UrBackup: Does it back up Linux servers as well?
File backups yes, image backups no. The image path is Windows only through volume shadow copy.
Caddy: What does automatic HTTPS mean?
Caddy obtains certificates from Let’s Encrypt or ZeroSSL on first request and renews them before expiry, with no cron job or configuration.
UrBackup: Is the data encrypted?
Transport can be encrypted, and there is optional client side file encryption, but the default server storage is not encrypted at rest. Use full disk encryption on the server.
Caddy: Caddy or Nginx?
Caddy is dramatically simpler to configure and removes certificate management. Nginx has the larger ecosystem and better peak throughput.
UrBackup: Can I back up to Amazon S3?
Not directly. The server writes to local or mounted storage, so cloud copies are made by replicating that storage separately.
UrBackup: How many clients can one server handle?
Dozens is routine on decent hardware. The limit is usually storage input and output during overlapping backup windows rather than client count.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Caddy vs HAProxy
- Caddy vs Packer
- Caddy vs Pulumi
- Caddy vs Portworx
- Caddy vs Podman
- Caddy vs Rancher
- Caddy vs Porter
- Caddy vs Flux
- Caddy vs Contabo
- Caddy vs Coolify
- Caddy vs Crossplane
- Caddy vs Dokku
- Caddy vs Encore
- Caddy vs Vagrant
- Caddy vs Buildah
- Caddy vs Kustomize
- Caddy vs Skopeo
- Caddy vs containerd
- Caddy vs Bacula
- Caddy vs Velero
- Caddy vs Kopia
- Caddy vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Caddy vs Clonezilla
- Caddy vs Amanda Enterprise
- Caddy vs rustic
- Caddy vs BDRShield
- Caddy vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Caddy vs Borg Backup
- Caddy vs Restic
- Caddy vs Clumio
- Caddy vs Cohesity
- Caddy vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Caddy vs Bacula Enterprise
- UrBackup vs HAProxy
- UrBackup vs Packer
- UrBackup vs Pulumi
- UrBackup vs Portworx
- UrBackup vs Podman
- UrBackup vs Rancher
- UrBackup vs Porter
- UrBackup vs Flux
- UrBackup vs Contabo
- UrBackup vs Coolify
- UrBackup vs Crossplane
- UrBackup vs Dokku
- UrBackup vs Encore
- UrBackup vs Vagrant
- UrBackup vs Buildah
- UrBackup vs Kustomize
- UrBackup vs Skopeo
- UrBackup vs containerd
- UrBackup vs Bacula
- UrBackup vs Velero
- UrBackup vs Kopia
- UrBackup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- UrBackup vs Clonezilla
- UrBackup vs Amanda Enterprise
- UrBackup vs rustic
- UrBackup vs BDRShield
- UrBackup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- UrBackup vs Borg Backup
- UrBackup vs Restic
- UrBackup vs Clumio
- UrBackup vs Cohesity
- UrBackup vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

