Cloud · head to head
Crossplane vs UrBackup

UrBackup
Backup
Open source client server backup doing both file and whole disk image backups of Windows machines
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Crossplane requires Kubernetes expertise and infrastructure; UrBackup backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- They diverge on capability: Crossplane covers Kubernetes extension, UrBackup covers Windows image backups.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Crossplane and UrBackup actually diverge.
| Attribute | Crossplane | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Kubernetes, AWS, Azure, GCP | Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD |
| Category | Cloud | Backup |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Crossplane
- Kubernetes extension
- Custom API building
- Resource management anywhere
- Declarative interfaces
- Component library
- Provider ecosystem
Only in UrBackup
- Windows image backups
- File backups
- Web interface
- Client discovery
- Internet mode
- Filesystem deduplication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Crossplane
- Building platform-as-a-service offerings for internal teamsnot UrBackup
- Creating unified control layers for multi-cloud infrastructurenot UrBackup
- Designing declarative APIs for infrastructure provisioningnot UrBackup
UrBackup
- A small office with Windows workstations that needs bare metal restore without per seat licensingnot Crossplane
- Schools and labs where machines are re-imaged often and a known good image must be recoverablenot Crossplane
- Backing up a mixed fleet to one server on premises with a web interface non specialists can usenot Crossplane
- Replacing an expiring commercial endpoint backup licence where the budget is the constraintnot Crossplane
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Crossplane
- Requires Kubernetes expertise and infrastructure
- Steep learning curve for teams new to Kubernetes patterns
- Provider ecosystem smaller than Terraform
UrBackup
- Backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- Deduplication relies on filesystem features such as hard links, btrfs or ZFS, so a server built on the wrong filesystem silently consumes far more space and the fix is a rebuild rather than a setting.
- There is no native object storage target, so offsite copies mean replicating the server storage with another tool rather than backing up to a bucket directly.
- Restoring a full Windows image requires booting a restore environment, which is a manual, on site procedure that needs to be rehearsed before the day it is needed.
- A single server holds everything and there is no built in clustering, so its own failure removes every recovery point at once unless you have separately solved replication.
Pricing, plan by plan
Crossplane
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Crossplane review.
UrBackup
Free- UrBackupFree
- Full functionality, unlimited clients
- File and image backups
- Web administration interface
Which should you pick?
Choose Crossplane if
- You need kubernetes extension.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want custom api building.
Choose UrBackup if
- You need windows image backups.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- You also want file backups.
Questions people ask
- Is Crossplane or UrBackup better?
- Neither clearly leads. Crossplane starts at Free and UrBackup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Crossplane or UrBackup?
- Crossplane starts at Free and UrBackup at Free.
- Does Crossplane or UrBackup run on more platforms?
- Crossplane runs on Kubernetes, AWS, Azure, GCP. UrBackup runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- Can I use Crossplane for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Crossplane best used for?
- Crossplane is most often used for building platform-as-a-service offerings for internal teams, creating unified control layers for multi-cloud infrastructure, designing declarative apis for infrastructure provisioning. Of those, building platform-as-a-service offerings for internal teams and creating unified control layers for multi-cloud infrastructure are not what UrBackup is typically brought in for.
- What can Crossplane do that UrBackup cannot?
- Crossplane covers Kubernetes extension, Custom API building, Resource management anywhere, Declarative interfaces. UrBackup covers Windows image backups, File backups, Web interface, Client discovery.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Crossplane: Is Crossplane free?
Yes, Crossplane is open source and free to use. It requires a Kubernetes cluster but has no licensing costs.
SourceUrBackup: Does it back up Linux servers as well?
File backups yes, image backups no. The image path is Windows only through volume shadow copy.
Crossplane: What is Crossplane used for?
Crossplane is used to build control planes and platforms for infrastructure management, enabling platform teams to expose safe APIs to other teams.
SourceUrBackup: Is the data encrypted?
Transport can be encrypted, and there is optional client side file encryption, but the default server storage is not encrypted at rest. Use full disk encryption on the server.
UrBackup: Can I back up to Amazon S3?
Not directly. The server writes to local or mounted storage, so cloud copies are made by replicating that storage separately.
UrBackup: How many clients can one server handle?
Dozens is routine on decent hardware. The limit is usually storage input and output during overlapping backup windows rather than client count.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Crossplane vs Pulumi
- Crossplane vs containerd
- Crossplane vs Nitric
- Crossplane vs Vault
- Crossplane vs Portworx
- Crossplane vs Microsoft Azure
- Crossplane vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Crossplane vs DigitalOcean
- Crossplane vs Podman
- Crossplane vs K3s
- Crossplane vs OpenEBS
- Crossplane vs OVHcloud
- Crossplane vs Puppet
- Crossplane vs Cilium
- Crossplane vs Nomad
- Crossplane vs Bacula
- Crossplane vs Velero
- Crossplane vs Kopia
- Crossplane vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Crossplane vs Clonezilla
- Crossplane vs Amanda Enterprise
- Crossplane vs rustic
- Crossplane vs BDRShield
- Crossplane vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Crossplane vs Borg Backup
- Crossplane vs Restic
- Crossplane vs Clumio
- Crossplane vs Cohesity
- Crossplane vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Crossplane vs Bacula Enterprise
- UrBackup vs Pulumi
- UrBackup vs containerd
- UrBackup vs Nitric
- UrBackup vs Vault
- UrBackup vs Portworx
- UrBackup vs Microsoft Azure
- UrBackup vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- UrBackup vs DigitalOcean
- UrBackup vs Podman
- UrBackup vs K3s
- UrBackup vs OpenEBS
- UrBackup vs OVHcloud
- UrBackup vs Puppet
- UrBackup vs Cilium
- UrBackup vs Nomad
- UrBackup vs Bacula
- UrBackup vs Velero
- UrBackup vs Kopia
- UrBackup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- UrBackup vs Clonezilla
- UrBackup vs Amanda Enterprise
- UrBackup vs rustic
- UrBackup vs BDRShield
- UrBackup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- UrBackup vs Borg Backup
- UrBackup vs Restic
- UrBackup vs Clumio
- UrBackup vs Cohesity
- UrBackup vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

