Developer Tools · head to head
Buildkite vs LiquidPlanner

Buildkite
Developer Tools
CI/CD pipelines that run on your own compute
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

LiquidPlanner
Project Management
Predictive project management
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Buildkite is a CI/CD platform for build, test and deploy pipelines; LiquidPlanner is a predictive project management solution.
- Buildkite has a free plan, then $30/mo; LiquidPlanner starts at $15/mo.
- Where Buildkite falls short: free plan caps at 5 users and 10 concurrent jobs, with 2,000 Linux vCPU minutes per month and 30 day build retention.
- Where LiquidPlanner falls short: rebranded to Tempo Portfolio Manager; the pricing page shows no published figures, only an early access sign-up.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Buildkite and LiquidPlanner actually diverge.
| Attribute | Buildkite | LiquidPlanner |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Category | Developer Tools | Project Management |
Identical on both: pricing model (Subscription), platforms (Web).
Not yet recorded: founded for Buildkite.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Buildkite
Nothing recorded that LiquidPlanner does not also cover.
Only in LiquidPlanner
- Predictive scheduling
- Resource management
- Time tracking
- Analytics
- Workload management
- Jira
- Salesforce
- Slack
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Buildkite
- CI/CD pipeline automationnot LiquidPlanner
- Test execution at scalenot LiquidPlanner
- Deployment automationnot LiquidPlanner
LiquidPlanner
- Productivitynot Buildkite
- Collaborationnot Buildkite
- Task managementnot Buildkite
- Organizationnot Buildkite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Buildkite
- Free plan caps at 5 users and 10 concurrent jobs, with 2,000 Linux vCPU minutes per month and 30 day build retention
- Pro plan is $30 per active user per month, capped at 50 users, with only 10 of the up to 250 concurrent agents included before extra usage
- Enterprise plan enforces a 30 user minimum even though pricing itself is custom
- Hosted compute beyond included minutes is metered at $0.004 per vCPU minute on Linux and $0.02 per vCPU minute on Mac
LiquidPlanner
- Rebranded to Tempo Portfolio Manager; the pricing page shows no published figures, only an early access sign-up
Pricing, plan by plan
Buildkite
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 10 concurrent jobs
- 2000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly
- Pro$30/mo
- Up to 50 users
- 250 concurrent agents (10 included)
- 4000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly
- EnterpriseOn request
- Unlimited users (30 minimum)
- Custom usage limits
- Full platform access
LiquidPlanner
On request- Essentials$15/mo
- Project management
- Basic scheduling
- Professional$25/mo
- Predictive scheduling
- Resource management
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose LiquidPlanner if
- You need predictive scheduling.
- You also want resource management.
Questions people ask
- Is Buildkite or LiquidPlanner better?
- Neither clearly leads. Buildkite starts at Free and LiquidPlanner at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Buildkite or LiquidPlanner?
- Buildkite has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Buildkite and On request for LiquidPlanner.
- Does Buildkite or LiquidPlanner run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Buildkite for free?
- Yes. Buildkite has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. LiquidPlanner starts at On request.
- What is Buildkite best used for?
- Buildkite is most often used for ci/cd pipeline automation, test execution at scale, deployment automation. Of those, ci/cd pipeline automation and test execution at scale are not what LiquidPlanner is typically brought in for.
- What can Buildkite do that LiquidPlanner cannot?
- LiquidPlanner covers Predictive scheduling, Resource management, Time tracking, Analytics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Buildkite: Can I use Buildkite without paying?
Yes, Buildkite offers a free plan that includes up to 5 users, 10 concurrent jobs, 2000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly, and 250k test executions per month at no cost.
SourceLiquidPlanner: How is Tempo timesheets pricing calculated for my organization?
Pricing is per-user per month and scales based on organization size. For 1-10 users: $1.00/user; 11-100 users: $5.21/user; 101-250 users: $3.66/user; scaling down to $0.25-$0.39/user for organizations with 5,000+ users.
SourceBuildkite: What happens if I exceed my included compute minutes on Buildkite?
Hosted agent compute is charged separately at $0.004 per Linux vCPU minute and $0.02 per Mac vCPU minute, billed to the second with no minimums.
SourceLiquidPlanner: What license matching requirement exists for Tempo?
Your Tempo license size must match your Jira license size, with a user defined as anyone who can log into Jira.
SourceBuildkite: Do I need an annual commitment for Buildkite's Pro plan?
No, Buildkite's Pro plan is billed monthly at $30 per active user with no long-term contract required. All tiers include a 30-day all-access trial.
SourceLiquidPlanner: Is there a free trial for Tempo timesheets?
Yes, Tempo offers a free trial available through the Atlassian Marketplace.
SourceBuildkite: What user limits apply to each Buildkite plan?
Free plan supports up to 5 users, Pro plan supports up to 50 users, and Enterprise plan provides unlimited users with a 30-user minimum.
SourceLiquidPlanner: What deployment options are available for Tempo?
Both Cloud and Data Center deployment options are offered, with annual billing available.
SourceRelated pages
More on LiquidPlanner
Other head to heads
- Buildkite vs Depot
- Buildkite vs Dagger
- Buildkite vs GitLab CI/CD
- Buildkite vs Jenkins
- Buildkite vs Keycloak
- Buildkite vs Nx Cloud
- Buildkite vs Yarn
- Buildkite vs Atlantis
- Buildkite vs Coder
- Buildkite vs Tilt
- Buildkite vs Azure DevOps
- Buildkite vs PartyKit
- Buildkite vs GitHub Copilot
- Buildkite vs LaunchDarkly
- Buildkite vs Terraform
- Buildkite vs Visual Studio Code
- Buildkite vs CodeSandbox
- Buildkite vs GitLab
- Buildkite vs Trello
- Buildkite vs Basecamp
- Buildkite vs GanttPRO
- Buildkite vs Teamgantt
- Buildkite vs Aha!
- Buildkite vs Kanbanize
- Buildkite vs Toggl Plan
- Buildkite vs Asana
- Buildkite vs Clockwise
- Buildkite vs Reclaim.ai
- Buildkite vs MeisterTask
- Buildkite vs Plane
- Buildkite vs ClickUp
- Buildkite vs Linear
- Buildkite vs Monday.com
- Buildkite vs Statsig
- Buildkite vs Productboard
- Buildkite vs Jira
- LiquidPlanner vs Depot
- LiquidPlanner vs Dagger
- LiquidPlanner vs GitLab CI/CD
- LiquidPlanner vs Jenkins
- LiquidPlanner vs Keycloak
- LiquidPlanner vs Nx Cloud
- LiquidPlanner vs Yarn
- LiquidPlanner vs Atlantis
- LiquidPlanner vs Coder
- LiquidPlanner vs Tilt
- LiquidPlanner vs Azure DevOps
- LiquidPlanner vs PartyKit
- LiquidPlanner vs GitHub Copilot
- LiquidPlanner vs LaunchDarkly
- LiquidPlanner vs Terraform
- LiquidPlanner vs Visual Studio Code
- LiquidPlanner vs CodeSandbox
- LiquidPlanner vs GitLab
- LiquidPlanner vs Trello
- LiquidPlanner vs Basecamp
- LiquidPlanner vs GanttPRO
- LiquidPlanner vs Teamgantt
- LiquidPlanner vs Aha!
- LiquidPlanner vs Kanbanize
- LiquidPlanner vs Toggl Plan
- LiquidPlanner vs Asana
- LiquidPlanner vs Clockwise
- LiquidPlanner vs Reclaim.ai
- LiquidPlanner vs MeisterTask
- LiquidPlanner vs Plane
- LiquidPlanner vs ClickUp
- LiquidPlanner vs Linear
- LiquidPlanner vs Monday.com
- LiquidPlanner vs Statsig
- LiquidPlanner vs Productboard
- LiquidPlanner vs Jira
