Backup · head to head
Borg Backup vs Longhorn

Borg Backup
Backup
Deduplicating archiver with compression and encryption
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Longhorn
Cloud
Open source distributed block storage for Kubernetes, incubating at the CNCF
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Borg Backup linux, macOS and BSD only; Windows is not a supported platform; Longhorn there is no vendor and no SLA, so a production incident at three in the morning is your own problem unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime support separately.
- They diverge on capability: Borg Backup covers Content-defined chunking, Longhorn covers Per-volume controllers.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Borg Backup and Longhorn actually diverge.
| Attribute | Borg Backup | Longhorn |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Linux, Mac | Linux, Kubernetes |
| Category | Backup | Cloud |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Borg Backup
- Content-defined chunking
- Deduplication
- Compression
- Authenticated encryption
- Pruning
- Mount archives
- SSH
- BorgBase
Only in Longhorn
- Per-volume controllers
- Synchronous replication
- Snapshots and backups
- Volume expansion
- Disaster recovery volumes
- Web interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Borg Backup
- Deduplicated backups where daily full snapshots would otherwise be expensivenot Longhorn
- Encrypted backup to a server you do not fully trust, since the server never sees plaintextnot Longhorn
- Browsing previous versions by mounting an archive over FUSEnot Longhorn
- Scripted server backups with no agent or daemon to runnot Longhorn
Longhorn
- An on-premises Kubernetes cluster with local disks and no SAN that needs replicated persistent volumesnot Borg Backup
- Edge sites where shipping a storage array is impractical and three nodes is the whole clusternot Borg Backup
- A K3s deployment where the storage layer must be light enough to run alongside the workloadsnot Borg Backup
- A team that wants snapshots and S3 backups of persistent volumes without paying per-node storage licencesnot Borg Backup
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Borg Backup
- Linux, macOS and BSD only; Windows is not a supported platform
- Command-line only, with no graphical interface in the project itself
- Version 2.0 is still in beta, so production use means staying on the 1.4 line
- Restoring requires the Borg tooling, since archives are a deduplicated chunk store rather than plain files
Longhorn
- There is no vendor and no SLA, so a production incident at three in the morning is your own problem unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime support separately.
- Synchronous replication across nodes means write latency depends on the slowest replica and the network between nodes, which makes it a poor fit for latency-sensitive databases.
- Every replica is a full copy, so three-way replication consumes three times the raw capacity, unlike erasure-coded systems that are far more space efficient.
- It is designed for block storage on modest clusters and does not scale to the node counts or throughput that Ceph or a commercial array handles, so growth eventually forces a migration.
- Recovery from certain degraded states, such as a volume stuck detaching or replicas failing to rebuild, requires manual intervention and knowledge of Longhorn internals that is not widely held.
Pricing, plan by plan
Borg Backup
Free- FreeFree
- Deduplication
- Compression
- Encryption
Longhorn
Free- LonghornFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed, no licence fee
- Community support via GitHub and Slack only
- No vendor SLA or escalation path
Which should you pick?
Choose Borg Backup if
- You need content-defined chunking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac.
- You also want deduplication.
Choose Longhorn if
- You need per-volume controllers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes.
- You also want synchronous replication.
Questions people ask
- Is Borg Backup or Longhorn better?
- Neither clearly leads. Borg Backup starts at Free and Longhorn at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Borg Backup or Longhorn?
- Borg Backup starts at Free and Longhorn at Free.
- Does Borg Backup or Longhorn run on more platforms?
- Borg Backup runs on Linux, Mac. Longhorn runs on Linux, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Borg Backup for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Borg Backup best used for?
- Borg Backup is most often used for deduplicated backups where daily full snapshots would otherwise be expensive, encrypted backup to a server you do not fully trust, since the server never sees plaintext, browsing previous versions by mounting an archive over fuse, scripted server backups with no agent or daemon to run. Of those, deduplicated backups where daily full snapshots would otherwise be expensive and encrypted backup to a server you do not fully trust, since the server never sees plaintext are not what Longhorn is typically brought in for.
- What can Borg Backup do that Longhorn cannot?
- Borg Backup covers Content-defined chunking, Deduplication, Compression, Authenticated encryption. Longhorn covers Per-volume controllers, Synchronous replication, Snapshots and backups, Volume expansion.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Borg Backup: What is the cost of BorgBackup?
BorgBackup is completely free and open source under the BSD license with no mandatory costs for the core software.
SourceLonghorn: Who do we call when it breaks?
Nobody, unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime, which includes commercial support for Longhorn. This is the decisive question for production use.
Borg Backup: Are there paid services available for BorgBackup?
Yes, optional third-party services are available: BorgBase for specialized Borg repository hosting, Hetzner Storage Box with Borg support, and rsync.net cloud storage integration.
SourceLonghorn: How much capacity does replication cost?
Full copies, so three replicas means three times the raw capacity. Budget accordingly rather than assuming erasure coding efficiency.
Borg Backup: How can I support the BorgBackup project?
BorgBackup accepts voluntary contributions through Open Collective, GitHub Sponsors, Liberapay, and PayPal, though donations are optional.
SourceLonghorn: Is it suitable for production databases?
For modest workloads yes, but synchronous replication adds write latency and high-transaction databases usually want something faster.
Related pages
More on Borg Backup
Other head to heads
- Borg Backup vs Kopia
- Borg Backup vs rustic
- Borg Backup vs Backupify
- Borg Backup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Borg Backup vs Spanning Backup
- Borg Backup vs CloudAlly
- Borg Backup vs Restic
- Borg Backup vs Clonezilla
- Borg Backup vs Velero
- Borg Backup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Borg Backup vs Duplicacy
- Borg Backup vs HPE StoreOnce
- Borg Backup vs UrBackup
- Borg Backup vs Windows Backup
- Borg Backup vs Bacula
- Borg Backup vs Comet Backup
- Borg Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Borg Backup vs Portworx Backup
- Borg Backup vs Portworx
- Borg Backup vs OpenEBS
- Borg Backup vs Proxmox VE
- Borg Backup vs Anyscale
- Borg Backup vs Go
- Borg Backup vs Rancher
- Borg Backup vs Packer
- Borg Backup vs DeepInfra
- Borg Backup vs Serverless Framework
- Borg Backup vs Coolify
- Borg Backup vs Puppet
- Borg Backup vs Qovery
- Borg Backup vs Porter
- Borg Backup vs VictoriaMetrics
- Borg Backup vs Vultr
- Borg Backup vs Akamai
- Borg Backup vs Vagrant
- Longhorn vs Kopia
- Longhorn vs rustic
- Longhorn vs Backupify
- Longhorn vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Longhorn vs Spanning Backup
- Longhorn vs CloudAlly
- Longhorn vs Restic
- Longhorn vs Clonezilla
- Longhorn vs Velero
- Longhorn vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Longhorn vs Duplicacy
- Longhorn vs HPE StoreOnce
- Longhorn vs UrBackup
- Longhorn vs Windows Backup
- Longhorn vs Bacula
- Longhorn vs Comet Backup
- Longhorn vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Longhorn vs Portworx Backup
- Longhorn vs Portworx
- Longhorn vs OpenEBS
- Longhorn vs Proxmox VE
- Longhorn vs Anyscale
- Longhorn vs Go
- Longhorn vs Rancher
- Longhorn vs Packer
- Longhorn vs DeepInfra
- Longhorn vs Serverless Framework
- Longhorn vs Coolify
- Longhorn vs Puppet
- Longhorn vs Qovery
- Longhorn vs Porter
- Longhorn vs VictoriaMetrics
- Longhorn vs Vultr
- Longhorn vs Akamai
- Longhorn vs Vagrant
