Backup · head to head
Borg Backup vs Linkerd

Borg Backup
Backup
Deduplicating archiver with compression and encryption
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Borg Backup linux, macOS and BSD only; Windows is not a supported platform; Linkerd deliberately fewer features than Istio, so complex routing and multi-cluster policy can hit its limits
- They diverge on capability: Borg Backup covers Content-defined chunking, Linkerd covers Automatic mutual TLS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Borg Backup and Linkerd actually diverge.
| Attribute | Borg Backup | Linkerd |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Linux, Mac | Kubernetes, Linux |
| Category | Backup | Cloud |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Borg Backup
- Content-defined chunking
- Deduplication
- Compression
- Authenticated encryption
- Pruning
- Mount archives
- SSH
- BorgBase
Only in Linkerd
- Automatic mutual TLS
- Golden metrics
- Rust micro-proxy
- Traffic policy
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Borg Backup
- Deduplicated backups where daily full snapshots would otherwise be expensivenot Linkerd
- Encrypted backup to a server you do not fully trust, since the server never sees plaintextnot Linkerd
- Browsing previous versions by mounting an archive over FUSEnot Linkerd
- Scripted server backups with no agent or daemon to runnot Linkerd
Linkerd
- Adding mutual TLS between services to satisfy a compliance requirementnot Borg Backup
- Getting per-service latency and success rates without instrumenting applicationsnot Borg Backup
- Progressive delivery with traffic splitting during rolloutsnot Borg Backup
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Borg Backup
- Linux, macOS and BSD only; Windows is not a supported platform
- Command-line only, with no graphical interface in the project itself
- Version 2.0 is still in beta, so production use means staying on the 1.4 line
- Restoring requires the Borg tooling, since archives are a deduplicated chunk store rather than plain files
Linkerd
- Deliberately fewer features than Istio, so complex routing and multi-cluster policy can hit its limits
- Kubernetes only, with no story for workloads outside a cluster
- A sidecar per pod is still real memory and latency overhead, however small, and a mesh is another layer to debug during incidents
Pricing, plan by plan
Borg Backup
Free- FreeFree
- Deduplication
- Compression
- Encryption
Linkerd
Free- LinkerdFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Borg Backup if
- You need content-defined chunking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac.
- You also want deduplication.
Choose Linkerd if
- You need automatic mutual tls.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want golden metrics.
Questions people ask
- Is Borg Backup or Linkerd better?
- Neither clearly leads. Borg Backup starts at Free and Linkerd at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Borg Backup or Linkerd?
- Borg Backup starts at Free and Linkerd at Free.
- Does Borg Backup or Linkerd run on more platforms?
- Borg Backup runs on Linux, Mac. Linkerd runs on Kubernetes, Linux.
- Can I use Borg Backup for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Borg Backup best used for?
- Borg Backup is most often used for deduplicated backups where daily full snapshots would otherwise be expensive, encrypted backup to a server you do not fully trust, since the server never sees plaintext, browsing previous versions by mounting an archive over fuse, scripted server backups with no agent or daemon to run. Of those, deduplicated backups where daily full snapshots would otherwise be expensive and encrypted backup to a server you do not fully trust, since the server never sees plaintext are not what Linkerd is typically brought in for.
- What can Borg Backup do that Linkerd cannot?
- Borg Backup covers Content-defined chunking, Deduplication, Compression, Authenticated encryption. Linkerd covers Automatic mutual TLS, Golden metrics, Rust micro-proxy, Traffic policy.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Borg Backup: What is the cost of BorgBackup?
BorgBackup is completely free and open source under the BSD license with no mandatory costs for the core software.
SourceLinkerd: Is Linkerd free?
The open-source project is free. Buoyant, its maintainer, sells enterprise distributions and support separately.
Borg Backup: Are there paid services available for BorgBackup?
Yes, optional third-party services are available: BorgBase for specialized Borg repository hosting, Hetzner Storage Box with Borg support, and rsync.net cloud storage integration.
SourceLinkerd: Linkerd or Istio?
Linkerd trades features for simplicity, with a smaller proxy and far less configuration. Istio is more capable and correspondingly more work to run.
Borg Backup: How can I support the BorgBackup project?
BorgBackup accepts voluntary contributions through Open Collective, GitHub Sponsors, Liberapay, and PayPal, though donations are optional.
SourceLinkerd: Do I need a service mesh at all?
Only if you need mutual TLS, uniform retries or per-service traffic metrics across many services. For a handful of services it is usually more machinery than the problem justifies.
Related pages
More on Borg Backup
Other head to heads
- Borg Backup vs Kopia
- Borg Backup vs rustic
- Borg Backup vs Backupify
- Borg Backup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Borg Backup vs Spanning Backup
- Borg Backup vs CloudAlly
- Borg Backup vs Restic
- Borg Backup vs Clonezilla
- Borg Backup vs Velero
- Borg Backup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Borg Backup vs Duplicacy
- Borg Backup vs HPE StoreOnce
- Borg Backup vs UrBackup
- Borg Backup vs Windows Backup
- Borg Backup vs Bacula
- Borg Backup vs Comet Backup
- Borg Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Borg Backup vs Portworx Backup
- Borg Backup vs Podman
- Borg Backup vs K3s
- Borg Backup vs VictoriaMetrics
- Borg Backup vs OpenEBS
- Borg Backup vs DigitalOcean
- Borg Backup vs Grafana Cloud
- Borg Backup vs Portworx
- Borg Backup vs Vault
- Borg Backup vs Akamai
- Borg Backup vs Crossplane
- Borg Backup vs OVHcloud
- Borg Backup vs Puppet
- Borg Backup vs Qovery
- Borg Backup vs Scaleway
- Borg Backup vs SST
- Borg Backup vs Buildah
- Borg Backup vs Rancher
- Borg Backup vs Skopeo
- Linkerd vs Kopia
- Linkerd vs rustic
- Linkerd vs Backupify
- Linkerd vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Linkerd vs Spanning Backup
- Linkerd vs CloudAlly
- Linkerd vs Restic
- Linkerd vs Clonezilla
- Linkerd vs Velero
- Linkerd vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Linkerd vs Duplicacy
- Linkerd vs HPE StoreOnce
- Linkerd vs UrBackup
- Linkerd vs Windows Backup
- Linkerd vs Bacula
- Linkerd vs Comet Backup
- Linkerd vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Linkerd vs Portworx Backup
- Linkerd vs Podman
- Linkerd vs K3s
- Linkerd vs VictoriaMetrics
- Linkerd vs OpenEBS
- Linkerd vs DigitalOcean
- Linkerd vs Grafana Cloud
- Linkerd vs Portworx
- Linkerd vs Vault
- Linkerd vs Akamai
- Linkerd vs Crossplane
- Linkerd vs OVHcloud
- Linkerd vs Puppet
- Linkerd vs Qovery
- Linkerd vs Scaleway
- Linkerd vs SST
- Linkerd vs Buildah
- Linkerd vs Rancher
- Linkerd vs Skopeo

