Backup · head to head
Borg Backup vs Buildah

Borg Backup
Backup
Deduplicating archiver with compression and encryption
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Buildah
Cloud
Build OCI container images without a daemon or a Dockerfile
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Borg Backup linux, macOS and BSD only; Windows is not a supported platform; Buildah linux only, with no native macOS or Windows support
- They diverge on capability: Borg Backup covers Content-defined chunking, Buildah covers Daemonless builds.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Borg Backup and Buildah actually diverge.
| Attribute | Borg Backup | Buildah |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Linux, Mac | Linux |
| Category | Backup | Cloud |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Borg Backup
- Content-defined chunking
- Deduplication
- Compression
- Authenticated encryption
- Pruning
- Mount archives
- SSH
- BorgBase
Only in Buildah
- Daemonless builds
- Rootless
- Dockerfile compatible
- Scriptable builds
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Borg Backup
- Deduplicated backups where daily full snapshots would otherwise be expensivenot Buildah
- Encrypted backup to a server you do not fully trust, since the server never sees plaintextnot Buildah
- Browsing previous versions by mounting an archive over FUSEnot Buildah
- Scripted server backups with no agent or daemon to runnot Buildah
Buildah
- Building images in CI without a privileged Docker daemonnot Borg Backup
- Producing minimal images with tighter layer control than a Dockerfile givesnot Borg Backup
- Scripted image assembly where a Dockerfile is the wrong abstractionnot Borg Backup
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Borg Backup
- Linux, macOS and BSD only; Windows is not a supported platform
- Command-line only, with no graphical interface in the project itself
- Version 2.0 is still in beta, so production use means staying on the 1.4 line
- Restoring requires the Borg tooling, since archives are a deduplicated chunk store rather than plain files
Buildah
- Linux only, with no native macOS or Windows support
- Scriptable builds are powerful but less portable and less familiar than a Dockerfile
- Narrow by design: it builds images and does not run them, so it needs Podman or another runtime alongside
Pricing, plan by plan
Borg Backup
Free- FreeFree
- Deduplication
- Compression
- Encryption
Buildah
Free- BuildahFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Borg Backup if
- You need content-defined chunking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac.
- You also want deduplication.
Choose Buildah if
- You need daemonless builds.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want rootless.
Questions people ask
- Is Borg Backup or Buildah better?
- Neither clearly leads. Borg Backup starts at Free and Buildah at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Borg Backup or Buildah?
- Borg Backup starts at Free and Buildah at Free.
- Does Borg Backup or Buildah run on more platforms?
- Borg Backup runs on Linux, Mac. Buildah runs on Linux.
- Can I use Borg Backup for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Borg Backup best used for?
- Borg Backup is most often used for deduplicated backups where daily full snapshots would otherwise be expensive, encrypted backup to a server you do not fully trust, since the server never sees plaintext, browsing previous versions by mounting an archive over fuse, scripted server backups with no agent or daemon to run. Of those, deduplicated backups where daily full snapshots would otherwise be expensive and encrypted backup to a server you do not fully trust, since the server never sees plaintext are not what Buildah is typically brought in for.
- What can Borg Backup do that Buildah cannot?
- Borg Backup covers Content-defined chunking, Deduplication, Compression, Authenticated encryption. Buildah covers Daemonless builds, Rootless, Dockerfile compatible, Scriptable builds.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Borg Backup: What is the cost of BorgBackup?
BorgBackup is completely free and open source under the BSD license with no mandatory costs for the core software.
SourceBuildah: Is Buildah free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Borg Backup: Are there paid services available for BorgBackup?
Yes, optional third-party services are available: BorgBase for specialized Borg repository hosting, Hetzner Storage Box with Borg support, and rsync.net cloud storage integration.
SourceBuildah: Do I still need a Dockerfile?
No. Buildah reads Dockerfiles if you have them, but images can be built entirely from shell commands instead.
Borg Backup: How can I support the BorgBackup project?
BorgBackup accepts voluntary contributions through Open Collective, GitHub Sponsors, Liberapay, and PayPal, though donations are optional.
SourceBuildah: How is Buildah different from Podman?
Buildah builds images; Podman runs them. Podman actually embeds Buildah for its build command, and the two are designed to be used together.
Related pages
More on Borg Backup
Other head to heads
- Borg Backup vs Kopia
- Borg Backup vs rustic
- Borg Backup vs Backupify
- Borg Backup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Borg Backup vs Spanning Backup
- Borg Backup vs CloudAlly
- Borg Backup vs Restic
- Borg Backup vs Clonezilla
- Borg Backup vs Velero
- Borg Backup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Borg Backup vs Duplicacy
- Borg Backup vs HPE StoreOnce
- Borg Backup vs UrBackup
- Borg Backup vs Windows Backup
- Borg Backup vs Bacula
- Borg Backup vs Comet Backup
- Borg Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Borg Backup vs Portworx Backup
- Borg Backup vs Flux
- Borg Backup vs Packer
- Borg Backup vs Portworx
- Borg Backup vs Porter
- Borg Backup vs Zeabur
- Borg Backup vs Pulumi
- Borg Backup vs Caddy
- Borg Backup vs K3s
- Borg Backup vs Northflank
- Borg Backup vs Oracle Cloud
- Borg Backup vs Orca Security
- Borg Backup vs containerd
- Borg Backup vs Vault
- Borg Backup vs Rancher
- Borg Backup vs minikube
- Borg Backup vs Longhorn
- Borg Backup vs OpenTelemetry
- Buildah vs Kopia
- Buildah vs rustic
- Buildah vs Backupify
- Buildah vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Buildah vs Spanning Backup
- Buildah vs CloudAlly
- Buildah vs Restic
- Buildah vs Clonezilla
- Buildah vs Velero
- Buildah vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Buildah vs Duplicacy
- Buildah vs HPE StoreOnce
- Buildah vs UrBackup
- Buildah vs Windows Backup
- Buildah vs Bacula
- Buildah vs Comet Backup
- Buildah vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Buildah vs Portworx Backup
- Buildah vs Flux
- Buildah vs Packer
- Buildah vs Portworx
- Buildah vs Porter
- Buildah vs Zeabur
- Buildah vs Pulumi
- Buildah vs Caddy
- Buildah vs K3s
- Buildah vs Northflank
- Buildah vs Oracle Cloud
- Buildah vs Orca Security
- Buildah vs containerd
- Buildah vs Vault
- Buildah vs Rancher
- Buildah vs minikube
- Buildah vs Longhorn
- Buildah vs OpenTelemetry
