Backup · head to head
Borg Backup vs Ceph

Borg Backup
Backup
Deduplicating archiver with compression and encryption
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Ceph
File Storage
Open source distributed storage providing object, block and file from one cluster
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Borg Backup linux, macOS and BSD only; Windows is not a supported platform; Ceph ceph assumes an operator who understands placement groups, CRUSH rules and recovery tuning, so organisations without dedicated storage staff routinely end up with a cluster that works until the first failure and then does not.
- They diverge on capability: Borg Backup covers Content-defined chunking, Ceph covers RADOS object store.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Borg Backup and Ceph actually diverge.
| Attribute | Borg Backup | Ceph |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Linux, Mac | Linux |
| Category | Backup | File Storage |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Borg Backup
- Content-defined chunking
- Deduplication
- Compression
- Authenticated encryption
- Pruning
- Mount archives
- SSH
- BorgBase
Only in Ceph
- RADOS object store
- RADOS Gateway
- RBD block devices
- CephFS
- CRUSH placement
- Erasure coded pools
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Borg Backup
- Deduplicated backups where daily full snapshots would otherwise be expensivenot Ceph
- Encrypted backup to a server you do not fully trust, since the server never sees plaintextnot Ceph
- Browsing previous versions by mounting an archive over FUSEnot Ceph
- Scripted server backups with no agent or daemon to runnot Ceph
Ceph
- Backing a private cloud where virtual machine disks, shared filesystems and an S3 endpoint all need the same hardwarenot Borg Backup
- Growing past the point where a proprietary array upgrade costs more than a rack of commodity serversnot Borg Backup
- Research and media environments with petabytes of data and staff who can operate storagenot Borg Backup
- Providing an S3 endpoint on premises with multi site replication under your own controlnot Borg Backup
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Borg Backup
- Linux, macOS and BSD only; Windows is not a supported platform
- Command-line only, with no graphical interface in the project itself
- Version 2.0 is still in beta, so production use means staying on the 1.4 line
- Restoring requires the Borg tooling, since archives are a deduplicated chunk store rather than plain files
Ceph
- Ceph assumes an operator who understands placement groups, CRUSH rules and recovery tuning, so organisations without dedicated storage staff routinely end up with a cluster that works until the first failure and then does not.
- Small clusters are inefficient: three way replication means a third of raw capacity is usable, and erasure coding needs enough failure domains to be safe, so the economics only work above a certain size.
- Recovery and rebalancing generate heavy internal traffic, so a failed disk can degrade client latency across the cluster unless backfill is throttled correctly beforehand.
- Upgrades must follow a strict daemon order across monitors, managers, OSDs and gateways, and a mistake in that order on a live cluster is difficult to reverse.
- Because it is self hosted, every byte served to the internet is transit you pay for on your own links, so the free licence does not mean free egress and bandwidth planning becomes your problem rather than the providers.
Pricing, plan by plan
Borg Backup
Free- FreeFree
- Deduplication
- Compression
- Encryption
Ceph
Free- CephFree
- Full functionality, no capacity limit
- Object, block and file interfaces
- Community support via mailing list and Slack
Which should you pick?
Choose Borg Backup if
- You need content-defined chunking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac.
- You also want deduplication.
Choose Ceph if
- You need rados object store.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want rados gateway.
Questions people ask
- Is Borg Backup or Ceph better?
- Neither clearly leads. Borg Backup starts at Free and Ceph at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Borg Backup or Ceph?
- Borg Backup starts at Free and Ceph at Free.
- Does Borg Backup or Ceph run on more platforms?
- Borg Backup runs on Linux, Mac. Ceph runs on Linux.
- Can I use Borg Backup for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Borg Backup best used for?
- Borg Backup is most often used for deduplicated backups where daily full snapshots would otherwise be expensive, encrypted backup to a server you do not fully trust, since the server never sees plaintext, browsing previous versions by mounting an archive over fuse, scripted server backups with no agent or daemon to run. Of those, deduplicated backups where daily full snapshots would otherwise be expensive and encrypted backup to a server you do not fully trust, since the server never sees plaintext are not what Ceph is typically brought in for.
- What can Borg Backup do that Ceph cannot?
- Borg Backup covers Content-defined chunking, Deduplication, Compression, Authenticated encryption. Ceph covers RADOS object store, RADOS Gateway, RBD block devices, CephFS.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Borg Backup: What is the cost of BorgBackup?
BorgBackup is completely free and open source under the BSD license with no mandatory costs for the core software.
SourceCeph: How many nodes do I need to start?
Three is the practical minimum for a replicated cluster with real fault tolerance, and most production advice starts at five once you account for maintenance windows.
Borg Backup: Are there paid services available for BorgBackup?
Yes, optional third-party services are available: BorgBase for specialized Borg repository hosting, Hetzner Storage Box with Borg support, and rsync.net cloud storage integration.
SourceCeph: Is it faster than a SAN?
Not on single stream latency. It wins on aggregate throughput and on growing without a forklift upgrade, which is a different property from raw speed.
Borg Backup: How can I support the BorgBackup project?
BorgBackup accepts voluntary contributions through Open Collective, GitHub Sponsors, Liberapay, and PayPal, though donations are optional.
SourceCeph: Can I buy support?
Yes. IBM sells IBM Storage Ceph and SUSE and others have offered supported builds; the upstream project itself is free.
Ceph: Should I use it just for S3?
If object is all you need, a dedicated object store is simpler to run. Ceph earns its complexity when you need block and file as well.
Related pages
More on Borg Backup
Other head to heads
- Borg Backup vs Kopia
- Borg Backup vs rustic
- Borg Backup vs Backupify
- Borg Backup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Borg Backup vs Spanning Backup
- Borg Backup vs CloudAlly
- Borg Backup vs Restic
- Borg Backup vs Clonezilla
- Borg Backup vs Velero
- Borg Backup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Borg Backup vs Duplicacy
- Borg Backup vs HPE StoreOnce
- Borg Backup vs UrBackup
- Borg Backup vs Windows Backup
- Borg Backup vs Bacula
- Borg Backup vs Comet Backup
- Borg Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Borg Backup vs Portworx Backup
- Borg Backup vs MinIO
- Borg Backup vs Panzura
- Borg Backup vs Scality RING
- Borg Backup vs VAST Data
- Borg Backup vs Backblaze
- Borg Backup vs Duplicati
- Borg Backup vs Storj
- Borg Backup vs Tigris
- Borg Backup vs Cloudflare R2
- Borg Backup vs Cloudian
- Borg Backup vs IDrive e2
- Borg Backup vs TrueNAS
- Borg Backup vs LucidLink
- Borg Backup vs pCloud
- Borg Backup vs Sync.com
- Ceph vs Kopia
- Ceph vs rustic
- Ceph vs Backupify
- Ceph vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Ceph vs Spanning Backup
- Ceph vs CloudAlly
- Ceph vs Restic
- Ceph vs Clonezilla
- Ceph vs Velero
- Ceph vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Ceph vs Duplicacy
- Ceph vs HPE StoreOnce
- Ceph vs UrBackup
- Ceph vs Windows Backup
- Ceph vs Bacula
- Ceph vs Comet Backup
- Ceph vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Ceph vs Portworx Backup
- Ceph vs MinIO
- Ceph vs Panzura
- Ceph vs Scality RING
- Ceph vs VAST Data
- Ceph vs Backblaze
- Ceph vs Duplicati
- Ceph vs Storj
- Ceph vs Tigris
- Ceph vs Cloudflare R2
- Ceph vs Cloudian
- Ceph vs IDrive e2
- Ceph vs TrueNAS
- Ceph vs LucidLink
- Ceph vs pCloud
- Ceph vs Sync.com
