Backup · head to head
Amanda Enterprise vs Ceph

Ceph
File Storage
Open source distributed storage providing object, block and file from one cluster
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amanda Enterprise minimum 10 workloads required for most use cases; Ceph ceph assumes an operator who understands placement groups, CRUSH rules and recovery tuning, so organisations without dedicated storage staff routinely end up with a cluster that works until the first failure and then does not.
- They diverge on capability: Amanda Enterprise covers Cross-platform backup, Ceph covers RADOS object store.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amanda Enterprise and Ceph actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amanda Enterprise | Ceph |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, Web | Linux |
| Category | Backup | File Storage |
| Founded | 2005 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amanda Enterprise
- Cross-platform backup
- Cloud integration
- Disk staging
- Encryption
- Web-based management
- Bare metal recovery
- AWS S3
- Azure
Only in Ceph
- RADOS object store
- RADOS Gateway
- RBD block devices
- CephFS
- CRUSH placement
- Erasure coded pools
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amanda Enterprise
- Data protectionnot Ceph
- Disaster recoverynot Ceph
- Business continuitynot Ceph
- Ransomware protectionnot Ceph
- Compliancenot Ceph
Ceph
- Backing a private cloud where virtual machine disks, shared filesystems and an S3 endpoint all need the same hardwarenot Amanda Enterprise
- Growing past the point where a proprietary array upgrade costs more than a rack of commodity serversnot Amanda Enterprise
- Research and media environments with petabytes of data and staff who can operate storagenot Amanda Enterprise
- Providing an S3 endpoint on premises with multi site replication under your own controlnot Amanda Enterprise
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amanda Enterprise
- Minimum 10 workloads required for most use cases
- Per-device pricing may increase costs for large deployments with many servers
- Enterprise plan requires contacting sales for custom quotes
- NAS/File share backups charged separately at $4.99-$5.99/TB/month after first 10 TB free
Ceph
- Ceph assumes an operator who understands placement groups, CRUSH rules and recovery tuning, so organisations without dedicated storage staff routinely end up with a cluster that works until the first failure and then does not.
- Small clusters are inefficient: three way replication means a third of raw capacity is usable, and erasure coding needs enough failure domains to be safe, so the economics only work above a certain size.
- Recovery and rebalancing generate heavy internal traffic, so a failed disk can degrade client latency across the cluster unless backfill is throttled correctly beforehand.
- Upgrades must follow a strict daemon order across monitors, managers, OSDs and gateways, and a mistake in that order on a live cluster is difficult to reverse.
- Because it is self hosted, every byte served to the internet is transit you pay for on your own links, so the free licence does not mean free egress and bandwidth planning becomes your problem rather than the providers.
Pricing, plan by plan
Amanda Enterprise
Free- Business$5.99/monthly
- Linux/Windows backup
- Database backup
- M365 backup
- Business Plus$6.99/monthly
- Everything in Business plus: 24/7 premium support
- 10 hours pro services
- 8 hours training
- Enterprise$undefined/quote
- Everything in Business Plus plus: Integrated data resiliency
- Expert consultation & design
- Bulk automation scripts
Ceph
Free- CephFree
- Full functionality, no capacity limit
- Object, block and file interfaces
- Community support via mailing list and Slack
Which should you pick?
Choose Amanda Enterprise if
- You need cross-platform backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want cloud integration.
Choose Ceph if
- You need rados object store.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want rados gateway.
Questions people ask
- Is Amanda Enterprise or Ceph better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amanda Enterprise starts at Free and Ceph at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amanda Enterprise or Ceph?
- Amanda Enterprise starts at Free and Ceph at Free.
- Does Amanda Enterprise or Ceph run on more platforms?
- Amanda Enterprise runs on Windows, Linux, Web. Ceph runs on Linux.
- Can I use Amanda Enterprise for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amanda Enterprise best used for?
- Amanda Enterprise is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what Ceph is typically brought in for.
- What can Amanda Enterprise do that Ceph cannot?
- Amanda Enterprise covers Cross-platform backup, Cloud integration, Disk staging, Encryption. Ceph covers RADOS object store, RADOS Gateway, RBD block devices, CephFS.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amanda Enterprise: How much does Zmanda Pro backup software cost?
Zmanda pricing starts at $5.99/month per device for the Business plan and $6.99/month per device for Business Plus with 24/7 support. Enterprise plans are custom-priced. Pricing estimator available at zmanda.com/pricing to calculate costs based on workload count and storage. Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20241128003646/https://www.zmanda.com/pricing/
SourceCeph: How many nodes do I need to start?
Three is the practical minimum for a replicated cluster with real fault tolerance, and most production advice starts at five once you account for maintenance windows.
Amanda Enterprise: Is Zmanda's licensing model flexible?
Yes, Zmanda's licensing is flexible, you can change your server or client license midway if your backup environment changes and only pay the difference. Additional professional services cost $200/hour for consulting.
SourceCeph: Is it faster than a SAN?
Not on single stream latency. It wins on aggregate throughput and on growing without a forklift upgrade, which is a different property from raw speed.
Amanda Enterprise: What payment options does Zmanda accept?
Zmanda offers multiple payment options including electronic fund transfers (EFTs), wire transfers, and credit card payments with flexible 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year license periods available.
SourceCeph: Can I buy support?
Yes. IBM sells IBM Storage Ceph and SUSE and others have offered supported builds; the upstream project itself is free.
Ceph: Should I use it just for S3?
If object is all you need, a dedicated object store is simpler to run. Ceph earns its complexity when you need block and file as well.
Related pages
More on Amanda Enterprise
Other head to heads
- Amanda Enterprise vs CloudAlly
- Amanda Enterprise vs Backupify
- Amanda Enterprise vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Amanda Enterprise vs Spanning Backup
- Amanda Enterprise vs Bacula Enterprise
- Amanda Enterprise vs Duplicacy
- Amanda Enterprise vs Quest NetVault Backup
- Amanda Enterprise vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Amanda Enterprise vs Velero
- Amanda Enterprise vs Clonezilla
- Amanda Enterprise vs UrBackup
- Amanda Enterprise vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Amanda Enterprise vs Redstor
- Amanda Enterprise vs rustic
- Amanda Enterprise vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Amanda Enterprise vs SysCloud
- Amanda Enterprise vs Trilio
- Amanda Enterprise vs Unitrends Backup
- Amanda Enterprise vs MinIO
- Amanda Enterprise vs Panzura
- Amanda Enterprise vs Scality RING
- Amanda Enterprise vs VAST Data
- Amanda Enterprise vs Backblaze
- Amanda Enterprise vs Duplicati
- Amanda Enterprise vs Storj
- Amanda Enterprise vs Tigris
- Amanda Enterprise vs Cloudflare R2
- Amanda Enterprise vs Cloudian
- Amanda Enterprise vs IDrive e2
- Amanda Enterprise vs TrueNAS
- Amanda Enterprise vs LucidLink
- Amanda Enterprise vs pCloud
- Amanda Enterprise vs Sync.com
- Ceph vs CloudAlly
- Ceph vs Backupify
- Ceph vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Ceph vs Spanning Backup
- Ceph vs Bacula Enterprise
- Ceph vs Duplicacy
- Ceph vs Quest NetVault Backup
- Ceph vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Ceph vs Velero
- Ceph vs Clonezilla
- Ceph vs UrBackup
- Ceph vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Ceph vs Redstor
- Ceph vs rustic
- Ceph vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Ceph vs SysCloud
- Ceph vs Trilio
- Ceph vs Unitrends Backup
- Ceph vs MinIO
- Ceph vs Panzura
- Ceph vs Scality RING
- Ceph vs VAST Data
- Ceph vs Backblaze
- Ceph vs Duplicati
- Ceph vs Storj
- Ceph vs Tigris
- Ceph vs Cloudflare R2
- Ceph vs Cloudian
- Ceph vs IDrive e2
- Ceph vs TrueNAS
- Ceph vs LucidLink
- Ceph vs pCloud
- Ceph vs Sync.com

