Government · head to head
Bonfire vs iCompass

Bonfire
Government
Public sector sourcing and bid evaluation software with scored, auditable award decisions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bonfire it is a sourcing and evaluation tool rather than full procure to pay, so requisitions, purchase orders and invoicing stay in the finance system and the join between them is the agency's problem.; iCompass iCompass (a Diligent Corporation product for local government agenda management) publishes no pricing on its own site; every call to action is Contact Us or Request a Demo, with no figures anywhere on the page.
- They diverge on capability: Bonfire covers Solicitation posting, iCompass covers Agenda Creation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bonfire and iCompass actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Government).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bonfire
- Solicitation posting
- Sealed submission intake
- Scored evaluation workspace
- Audit trail
- Supplier portal
- Requirement matrices
Only in iCompass
- Agenda Creation
- Meeting Minutes
- Document Management
- Public Meeting Portal
- Voting Management
- Microsoft Office
- Video Streaming
- Document Storage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bonfire
- An agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation recordnot iCompass
- A procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and emailnot iCompass
- A university or health system applying public procurement rules without a public procurement systemnot iCompass
- An agency wanting suppliers to self register and receive addenda automatically rather than by mailing listnot iCompass
iCompass
- Citizen Servicesnot Bonfire
- Records Managementnot Bonfire
- Public Safetynot Bonfire
- Civic Engagementnot Bonfire
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bonfire
- It is a sourcing and evaluation tool rather than full procure to pay, so requisitions, purchase orders and invoicing stay in the finance system and the join between them is the agency's problem.
- Since the acquisition path from GTY to GI Partners to Euna Solutions, Bonfire sits in a portfolio alongside products it once competed with, which narrows a shortlist that appears independent.
- Suppliers must register on the portal to bid, and small local vendors reliably complain about the extra account, which can reduce responses on low value solicitations.
- Pricing is quoted rather than published and scales with solicitation volume, so an agency with a few very large procurements pays a model designed around throughput.
- Contract management after award is thin compared with dedicated contract lifecycle products, so agencies often buy a second system for the obligations the award created.
iCompass
- iCompass (a Diligent Corporation product for local government agenda management) publishes no pricing on its own site; every call to action is Contact Us or Request a Demo, with no figures anywhere on the page.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bonfire
On request- Bonfire$undefined/year
- Quoted by agency size and annual solicitation volume
- Supplier side registration is free, which is how the vendor network grows
- Implementation and training quoted separately from subscription
iCompass
$400/month- Government$400/month
- Agenda Management
- Meeting Minutes
- Public Portal
Which should you pick?
Choose Bonfire if
- You need solicitation posting.
- You also want sealed submission intake.
Choose iCompass if
- You need agenda creation.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want meeting minutes.
Questions people ask
- Is Bonfire or iCompass better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bonfire starts at On request and iCompass at $400/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bonfire or iCompass?
- Bonfire starts at On request and iCompass at $400/month.
- Does Bonfire or iCompass run on more platforms?
- Bonfire runs on Web. iCompass runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- What is Bonfire best used for?
- Bonfire is most often used for an agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation record, a procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and email, a university or health system applying public procurement rules without a public procurement system, an agency wanting suppliers to self register and receive addenda automatically rather than by mailing list. Of those, an agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation record and a procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and email are not what iCompass is typically brought in for.
- What can Bonfire do that iCompass cannot?
- Bonfire covers Solicitation posting, Sealed submission intake, Scored evaluation workspace, Audit trail. iCompass covers Agenda Creation, Meeting Minutes, Document Management, Public Meeting Portal.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bonfire: Who owns Bonfire?
Euna Solutions. Bonfire was acquired by GTY Technology in 2019, GTY was taken private by GI Partners in 2022, and the portfolio was rebranded Euna Solutions in 2023.
Bonfire: Is it full procure to pay?
No. It covers sourcing and evaluation through award. Purchase orders and invoicing remain in the finance system.
Bonfire: What is the real value?
A defensible, time stamped evaluation record when an award is protested, which is the expensive failure mode in public procurement.
Bonfire: Can we see what other agencies pay?
Yes. These contracts are public records. Read several comparable awards before negotiating.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bonfire vs Bidnet Direct
- Bonfire vs Periscope Holdings
- Bonfire vs NEOGOV
- Bonfire vs ArchiveSocial
- Bonfire vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Bonfire vs mySidewalk
- Bonfire vs SAP for Government
- Bonfire vs Clariti
- Bonfire vs GovPilot
- Bonfire vs Zencity
- Bonfire vs Tyler Technologies
- Bonfire vs Polco
- Bonfire vs SafeCity
- Bonfire vs SeeClickFix
- Bonfire vs ShotSpotter
- Bonfire vs Springbrook Software
- Bonfire vs Rock Solid
- Bonfire vs DocuWare
- Bonfire vs Accela
- Bonfire vs CivicPlus
- Bonfire vs Granicus
- Bonfire vs OpenGov
- Bonfire vs Socrata
- Bonfire vs ClearGov
- Bonfire vs NextRequest
- Bonfire vs MuckRock
- Bonfire vs Vigilant Solutions
- Bonfire vs Workday Government
- Bonfire vs Legistar
- Bonfire vs Incode
- Bonfire vs Tyler Brazos
- iCompass vs Bidnet Direct
- iCompass vs Periscope Holdings
- iCompass vs NEOGOV
- iCompass vs ArchiveSocial
- iCompass vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- iCompass vs mySidewalk
- iCompass vs SAP for Government
- iCompass vs Clariti
- iCompass vs GovPilot
- iCompass vs Zencity
- iCompass vs Tyler Technologies
- iCompass vs Polco
- iCompass vs SafeCity
- iCompass vs SeeClickFix
- iCompass vs ShotSpotter
- iCompass vs Springbrook Software
- iCompass vs Rock Solid
- iCompass vs DocuWare
- iCompass vs Accela
- iCompass vs CivicPlus
- iCompass vs Granicus
- iCompass vs OpenGov
- iCompass vs Socrata
- iCompass vs ClearGov
- iCompass vs NextRequest
- iCompass vs MuckRock
- iCompass vs Vigilant Solutions
- iCompass vs Workday Government
- iCompass vs Legistar
- iCompass vs Incode
- iCompass vs Tyler Brazos

