Government · head to head
Bonfire vs Incode

Bonfire
Government
Public sector sourcing and bid evaluation software with scored, auditable award decisions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bonfire it is a sourcing and evaluation tool rather than full procure to pay, so requisitions, purchase orders and invoicing stay in the finance system and the join between them is the agency's problem.; Incode incode is now sold as Tyler ERP Pro and tylertech.com/products/incode redirects to the ERP Pro product page
- They diverge on capability: Bonfire covers Solicitation posting, Incode covers General Ledger.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bonfire and Incode actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Government).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bonfire
- Solicitation posting
- Sealed submission intake
- Scored evaluation workspace
- Audit trail
- Supplier portal
- Requirement matrices
Only in Incode
- General Ledger
- Accounts Payable
- Payroll Management
- Utility Billing
- Budget Management
- Bank Integrations
- ADP
- Third-party Payroll
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bonfire
- An agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation recordnot Incode
- A procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and emailnot Incode
- A university or health system applying public procurement rules without a public procurement systemnot Incode
- An agency wanting suppliers to self register and receive addenda automatically rather than by mailing listnot Incode
Incode
- Financial management and ERP for small and mid-sized local governmentsnot Bonfire
- Utility billing, payroll and human resources for city and county administrationnot Bonfire
- Court and public safety records for municipalitiesnot Bonfire
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bonfire
- It is a sourcing and evaluation tool rather than full procure to pay, so requisitions, purchase orders and invoicing stay in the finance system and the join between them is the agency's problem.
- Since the acquisition path from GTY to GI Partners to Euna Solutions, Bonfire sits in a portfolio alongside products it once competed with, which narrows a shortlist that appears independent.
- Suppliers must register on the portal to bid, and small local vendors reliably complain about the extra account, which can reduce responses on low value solicitations.
- Pricing is quoted rather than published and scales with solicitation volume, so an agency with a few very large procurements pays a model designed around throughput.
- Contract management after award is thin compared with dedicated contract lifecycle products, so agencies often buy a second system for the obligations the award created.
Incode
- Incode is now sold as Tyler ERP Pro and tylertech.com/products/incode redirects to the ERP Pro product page
- No pricing is published; Tyler routes all enquiries through contact and demo requests with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
- The product is sold only to public sector organisations
Pricing, plan by plan
Bonfire
On request- Bonfire$undefined/year
- Quoted by agency size and annual solicitation volume
- Supplier side registration is free, which is how the vendor network grows
- Implementation and training quoted separately from subscription
Incode
$700/month- Municipal Suite$700/month
- Financial Management
- HR/Payroll
- Utility Billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Bonfire if
- You need solicitation posting.
- You also want sealed submission intake.
Choose Incode if
- You need general ledger.
- You work on Web, Desktop.
- You also want accounts payable.
Questions people ask
- Is Bonfire or Incode better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bonfire starts at On request and Incode at $700/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bonfire or Incode?
- Bonfire starts at On request and Incode at $700/month.
- Does Bonfire or Incode run on more platforms?
- Bonfire runs on Web. Incode runs on Web, Desktop.
- What is Bonfire best used for?
- Bonfire is most often used for an agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation record, a procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and email, a university or health system applying public procurement rules without a public procurement system, an agency wanting suppliers to self register and receive addenda automatically rather than by mailing list. Of those, an agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation record and a procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and email are not what Incode is typically brought in for.
- What can Bonfire do that Incode cannot?
- Bonfire covers Solicitation posting, Sealed submission intake, Scored evaluation workspace, Audit trail. Incode covers General Ledger, Accounts Payable, Payroll Management, Utility Billing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bonfire: Who owns Bonfire?
Euna Solutions. Bonfire was acquired by GTY Technology in 2019, GTY was taken private by GI Partners in 2022, and the portfolio was rebranded Euna Solutions in 2023.
Bonfire: Is it full procure to pay?
No. It covers sourcing and evaluation through award. Purchase orders and invoicing remain in the finance system.
Bonfire: What is the real value?
A defensible, time stamped evaluation record when an award is protested, which is the expensive failure mode in public procurement.
Bonfire: Can we see what other agencies pay?
Yes. These contracts are public records. Read several comparable awards before negotiating.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bonfire vs Bidnet Direct
- Bonfire vs Periscope Holdings
- Bonfire vs NEOGOV
- Bonfire vs ArchiveSocial
- Bonfire vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Bonfire vs mySidewalk
- Bonfire vs SAP for Government
- Bonfire vs Clariti
- Bonfire vs GovPilot
- Bonfire vs Zencity
- Bonfire vs Tyler Technologies
- Bonfire vs Polco
- Bonfire vs SafeCity
- Bonfire vs SeeClickFix
- Bonfire vs ShotSpotter
- Bonfire vs Springbrook Software
- Bonfire vs Rock Solid
- Bonfire vs CivicPlus
- Bonfire vs Granicus
- Bonfire vs Accela
- Bonfire vs DocuWare
- Bonfire vs Workday Government
- Bonfire vs Mapbox Government
- Bonfire vs OpenCities
- Bonfire vs CentralSquare
- Bonfire vs Axon Records
- Bonfire vs Nextdoor for Government
- Bonfire vs Oracle Government Cloud
- Bonfire vs Palantir Gotham
- Bonfire vs Ring Neighbors
- Incode vs Bidnet Direct
- Incode vs Periscope Holdings
- Incode vs NEOGOV
- Incode vs ArchiveSocial
- Incode vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Incode vs mySidewalk
- Incode vs SAP for Government
- Incode vs Clariti
- Incode vs GovPilot
- Incode vs Zencity
- Incode vs Tyler Technologies
- Incode vs Polco
- Incode vs SafeCity
- Incode vs SeeClickFix
- Incode vs ShotSpotter
- Incode vs Springbrook Software
- Incode vs Rock Solid
- Incode vs CivicPlus
- Incode vs Granicus
- Incode vs Accela
- Incode vs DocuWare
- Incode vs Workday Government
- Incode vs Mapbox Government
- Incode vs OpenCities
- Incode vs CentralSquare
- Incode vs Axon Records
- Incode vs Nextdoor for Government
- Incode vs Oracle Government Cloud
- Incode vs Palantir Gotham
- Incode vs Ring Neighbors

