Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Zeabur

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Zeabur free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Zeabur covers AI Agent.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Zeabur actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Zeabur |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Fixed monthly plans |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web, CLI |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cloud |
| Founded | Unknown | 2025 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Zeabur
- AI Agent
- Managed Servers
- Domain and DNS Management
- Email Service
- AI Hub
- Deploy Templates
- Git Integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Zeabur
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Zeabur
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Zeabur
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Zeabur
Zeabur
- Deploying full-stack web applications without DevOps expertisenot Blacksmith
- Building AI agent infrastructure with integrated API accessnot Blacksmith
- Managing multi-region deployments with automated scalingnot Blacksmith
- Running containerized services with built-in domain and emailnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Zeabur
- Free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Small team size may limit support and feature velocity
- Building spec upgrades limited on lower tiers
- Enterprise support not clearly documented
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Zeabur
Free- FreeFree
- 1 manageable server
- 2C4G build specs
- 48-hour log retention
- Dev$5/month
- 3 manageable servers
- 7-day log retention
- 250 MB file uploads
- Pro$19/month
- 10 manageable servers
- 4C8G build specs
- 30-day log retention
- Team$79/month
- 3 included seats
- Unlimited manageable servers
- 90-day log retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Zeabur if
- You need ai agent.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want managed servers.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Zeabur better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Zeabur at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Zeabur?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Zeabur at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Zeabur run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Zeabur runs on Web, CLI.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Zeabur is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Zeabur cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Zeabur covers AI Agent, Managed Servers, Domain and DNS Management, Email Service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceZeabur: What is included in the free plan?
The free plan includes 1 manageable server, 2C4G build specifications, 48-hour log retention, 50 MB file upload limit, and community support.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceZeabur: How do additional seats work on the Team plan?
The Team plan includes 3 seats with additional seats available at $24 per seat per month.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceZeabur: Is there a free trial period?
The Dev and Pro plans include 14 days free before billing begins.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Restate
- Blacksmith vs RubyMine
- Blacksmith vs Soketi
- Blacksmith vs SonarQube
- Blacksmith vs Sourcegraph
- Blacksmith vs Railway
- Blacksmith vs Fly.io
- Blacksmith vs Porter
- Blacksmith vs Encore
- Blacksmith vs Vultr
- Blacksmith vs Hetzner Cloud
- Blacksmith vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Blacksmith vs Linode
- Blacksmith vs Google Cloud Platform
- Blacksmith vs Microsoft Azure
- Blacksmith vs Coolify
- Blacksmith vs Wasabi
- Blacksmith vs Terragrunt
- Blacksmith vs Thanos
- Blacksmith vs Zipkin
- Blacksmith vs Anyscale
- Blacksmith vs Fireworks AI
- Blacksmith vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Zeabur vs WarpBuild
- Zeabur vs Depot
- Zeabur vs Namespace
- Zeabur vs Earthly
- Zeabur vs Nx Cloud
- Zeabur vs OpsLevel
- Zeabur vs Garden
- Zeabur vs ConfigCat
- Zeabur vs Dagger
- Zeabur vs Nix
- Zeabur vs Rust
- Zeabur vs Ansible
- Zeabur vs Refact
- Zeabur vs Restate
- Zeabur vs RubyMine
- Zeabur vs Soketi
- Zeabur vs SonarQube
- Zeabur vs Sourcegraph
- Zeabur vs Railway
- Zeabur vs Fly.io
- Zeabur vs Porter
- Zeabur vs Encore
- Zeabur vs Vultr
- Zeabur vs Hetzner Cloud
- Zeabur vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zeabur vs Linode
- Zeabur vs Google Cloud Platform
- Zeabur vs Microsoft Azure
- Zeabur vs Coolify
- Zeabur vs Wasabi
- Zeabur vs Terragrunt
- Zeabur vs Thanos
- Zeabur vs Zipkin
- Zeabur vs Anyscale
- Zeabur vs Fireworks AI
- Zeabur vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)

