Developer Tools · head to head
Namespace vs Zeabur

Namespace
Developer Tools
The dev platform for the next 100 billion commits
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Namespace developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear; Zeabur free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- They diverge on capability: Namespace covers Devboxes, Zeabur covers AI Agent.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Namespace and Zeabur actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Namespace
- Devboxes
- GitHub Actions runners
- Docker builds
- Cross-invocation caching
- NVMe storage
- High-speed networking
- Multiple OS support
- Bazel and Turborepo support
Only in Zeabur
- AI Agent
- Managed Servers
- Domain and DNS Management
- Email Service
- AI Hub
- Deploy Templates
- Git Integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Namespace
- Providing AI coding agents with cloud-based development environmentsnot Zeabur
- Accelerating CI builds with faster GitHub Actions runnersnot Zeabur
- Distributing builds across teams with managed infrastructurenot Zeabur
- Scaling development velocity for monorepo organizationsnot Zeabur
Zeabur
- Deploying full-stack web applications without DevOps expertisenot Namespace
- Building AI agent infrastructure with integrated API accessnot Namespace
- Managing multi-region deployments with automated scalingnot Namespace
- Running containerized services with built-in domain and emailnot Namespace
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Namespace
- Developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- Team plan $100/mo is competitive but usage limits may be tight
- Devbox pricing separate at $0.004/minute could add up quickly
- Enterprise plan requires custom sales conversation
Zeabur
- Free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Small team size may limit support and feature velocity
- Building spec upgrades limited on lower tiers
- Enterprise support not clearly documented
Pricing, plan by plan
Namespace
Free- DeveloperFree
- Pay-as-you-go
- On-demand compute
- Docker builds
- Team$100/month
- 100,000 unit minutes
- 1,000 Docker builds
- Everything in Developer
- Business$250/month
- 250,000 unit minutes
- 2,500 Docker builds
- Everything in Team
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom compute/Docker build limits
- Audit log export
- Enterprise SSO
Zeabur
Free- FreeFree
- 1 manageable server
- 2C4G build specs
- 48-hour log retention
- Dev$5/month
- 3 manageable servers
- 7-day log retention
- 250 MB file uploads
- Pro$19/month
- 10 manageable servers
- 4C8G build specs
- 30-day log retention
- Team$79/month
- 3 included seats
- Unlimited manageable servers
- 90-day log retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Namespace if
- You need devboxes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux.
- You also want github actions runners.
Choose Zeabur if
- You need ai agent.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want managed servers.
Questions people ask
- Is Namespace or Zeabur better?
- Neither clearly leads. Namespace starts at Free and Zeabur at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Namespace or Zeabur?
- Namespace starts at Free and Zeabur at Free.
- Does Namespace or Zeabur run on more platforms?
- Namespace runs on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux. Zeabur runs on Web, CLI.
- Can I use Namespace for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Namespace best used for?
- Namespace is most often used for providing ai coding agents with cloud-based development environments, accelerating ci builds with faster github actions runners, distributing builds across teams with managed infrastructure, scaling development velocity for monorepo organizations. Of those, providing ai coding agents with cloud-based development environments and accelerating ci builds with faster github actions runners are not what Zeabur is typically brought in for.
- What can Namespace do that Zeabur cannot?
- Namespace covers Devboxes, GitHub Actions runners, Docker builds, Cross-invocation caching. Zeabur covers AI Agent, Managed Servers, Domain and DNS Management, Email Service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Namespace: How is compute usage metered on the Developer plan?
Developer plan uses pay-as-you-go billing. Devboxes bill at $0.004 per minute. Storage and caching services have separate usage-based fees. A 30-day free trial is available to test usage patterns.
SourceZeabur: What is included in the free plan?
The free plan includes 1 manageable server, 2C4G build specifications, 48-hour log retention, 50 MB file upload limit, and community support.
SourceNamespace: What is the difference between Team and Business plans?
Team ($100/mo) includes 100,000 unit minutes and 1,000 Docker builds with email support. Business ($250/mo) includes 250,000 unit minutes, 2,500 Docker builds, and high concurrency with a dedicated Slack channel.
SourceZeabur: How do additional seats work on the Team plan?
The Team plan includes 3 seats with additional seats available at $24 per seat per month.
SourceNamespace: Can Namespace support AI coding agents?
Yes, Namespace Devboxes are specifically designed as feature-rich development environments for AI coding agents, with full tooling and performance optimization.
SourceZeabur: Is there a free trial period?
The Dev and Pro plans include 14 days free before billing begins.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Namespace vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Namespace vs CodeSandbox
- Namespace vs WarpBuild
- Namespace vs Depot
- Namespace vs Blacksmith
- Namespace vs Earthly
- Namespace vs Daytona
- Namespace vs Ansible
- Namespace vs Garden
- Namespace vs ConfigCat
- Namespace vs Nix
- Namespace vs OpsLevel
- Namespace vs Webpack
- Namespace vs Avo
- Namespace vs Azure DevOps
- Namespace vs Backstage
- Namespace vs Bitbucket
- Namespace vs Claude Code
- Namespace vs Railway
- Namespace vs Fly.io
- Namespace vs Porter
- Namespace vs Encore
- Namespace vs Vultr
- Namespace vs Hetzner Cloud
- Namespace vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Namespace vs Linode
- Namespace vs Google Cloud Platform
- Namespace vs Microsoft Azure
- Namespace vs Coolify
- Namespace vs Wasabi
- Namespace vs Terragrunt
- Namespace vs Thanos
- Namespace vs Zipkin
- Namespace vs Anyscale
- Namespace vs Fireworks AI
- Namespace vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Zeabur vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Zeabur vs CodeSandbox
- Zeabur vs WarpBuild
- Zeabur vs Depot
- Zeabur vs Blacksmith
- Zeabur vs Earthly
- Zeabur vs Daytona
- Zeabur vs Ansible
- Zeabur vs Garden
- Zeabur vs ConfigCat
- Zeabur vs Nix
- Zeabur vs OpsLevel
- Zeabur vs Webpack
- Zeabur vs Avo
- Zeabur vs Azure DevOps
- Zeabur vs Backstage
- Zeabur vs Bitbucket
- Zeabur vs Claude Code
- Zeabur vs Railway
- Zeabur vs Fly.io
- Zeabur vs Porter
- Zeabur vs Encore
- Zeabur vs Vultr
- Zeabur vs Hetzner Cloud
- Zeabur vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zeabur vs Linode
- Zeabur vs Google Cloud Platform
- Zeabur vs Microsoft Azure
- Zeabur vs Coolify
- Zeabur vs Wasabi
- Zeabur vs Terragrunt
- Zeabur vs Thanos
- Zeabur vs Zipkin
- Zeabur vs Anyscale
- Zeabur vs Fireworks AI
- Zeabur vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)

