Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs SolidJS

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

SolidJS
Web Development
Reactive JavaScript framework with no virtual DOM
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; SolidJS much smaller ecosystem than React, so many problems have no off-the-shelf library
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, SolidJS covers No virtual DOM.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and SolidJS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | SolidJS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Web Development |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in SolidJS
- No virtual DOM
- Components run once
- JSX syntax
- Small bundles
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot SolidJS
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot SolidJS
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot SolidJS
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot SolidJS
SolidJS
- Interfaces where update performance is the binding constraintnot Blacksmith
- Teams comfortable with React syntax who want finer-grained reactivitynot Blacksmith
- Applications where bundle size directly affects the businessnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
SolidJS
- Much smaller ecosystem than React, so many problems have no off-the-shelf library
- The React-like syntax is misleading: components run once, and React habits produce subtle bugs
- Smaller hiring pool and fewer learning resources than the mainstream frameworks
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
SolidJS
Free- SolidJSFree
- Full library
- Commercial use permitted
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose SolidJS if
- You need no virtual dom.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want components run once.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or SolidJS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and SolidJS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or SolidJS?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and SolidJS at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or SolidJS run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. SolidJS runs on Web.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what SolidJS is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that SolidJS cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. SolidJS covers No virtual DOM, Components run once, JSX syntax, Small bundles.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceSolidJS: Is SolidJS free?
Yes, open source under the MIT licence.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceSolidJS: Is SolidJS just React without the virtual DOM?
The syntax is similar but the model is not. Solid components run once and reactivity is fine-grained, so patterns that are correct in React can be wrong in Solid.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceSolidJS: Why is SolidJS fast?
It compiles away much of the framework and updates individual DOM nodes directly, rather than re-rendering components and diffing a virtual DOM.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Restate
- Blacksmith vs RubyMine
- Blacksmith vs Soketi
- Blacksmith vs SonarQube
- Blacksmith vs Sourcegraph
- Blacksmith vs React
- Blacksmith vs Vue.js
- Blacksmith vs Preact
- Blacksmith vs Lit
- Blacksmith vs esbuild
- Blacksmith vs MUI
- Blacksmith vs Bootstrap
- Blacksmith vs shadcn/ui
- Blacksmith vs MySQL
- Blacksmith vs Docusaurus
- Blacksmith vs Angular
- Blacksmith vs Radix UI
- Blacksmith vs npm
- Blacksmith vs TanStack Start
- Blacksmith vs Alpine.js
- Blacksmith vs Astro
- Blacksmith vs Carrd
- Blacksmith vs HTMX
- SolidJS vs WarpBuild
- SolidJS vs Depot
- SolidJS vs Namespace
- SolidJS vs Earthly
- SolidJS vs Nx Cloud
- SolidJS vs OpsLevel
- SolidJS vs Garden
- SolidJS vs ConfigCat
- SolidJS vs Dagger
- SolidJS vs Nix
- SolidJS vs Rust
- SolidJS vs Ansible
- SolidJS vs Refact
- SolidJS vs Restate
- SolidJS vs RubyMine
- SolidJS vs Soketi
- SolidJS vs SonarQube
- SolidJS vs Sourcegraph
- SolidJS vs React
- SolidJS vs Vue.js
- SolidJS vs Preact
- SolidJS vs Lit
- SolidJS vs esbuild
- SolidJS vs MUI
- SolidJS vs Bootstrap
- SolidJS vs shadcn/ui
- SolidJS vs MySQL
- SolidJS vs Docusaurus
- SolidJS vs Angular
- SolidJS vs Radix UI
- SolidJS vs npm
- SolidJS vs TanStack Start
- SolidJS vs Alpine.js
- SolidJS vs Astro
- SolidJS vs Carrd
- SolidJS vs HTMX
