Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs MUI

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

MUI
Web Development
React component library implementing Material Design
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; MUI escaping the Material Design look takes more theming effort than teams expect
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, MUI covers Large component set.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and MUI actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | MUI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open-source core with paid tiers for advanced components |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Web Development |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in MUI
- Large component set
- Theming system
- Accessibility
- TypeScript support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot MUI
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot MUI
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot MUI
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot MUI
MUI
- Building an admin or internal application quickly with components that already worknot Blacksmith
- Teams needing accessible complex widgets without building themnot Blacksmith
- Products where Material Design is an acceptable or desired starting pointnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
MUI
- Escaping the Material Design look takes more theming effort than teams expect
- Bundle size is significant, and careless imports pull in far more than needed
- Advanced components such as the full data grid require a paid licence
- Major version upgrades have historically required real migration work
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
MUI
Free- CommunityFree
- Core component library
- Theming
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose MUI if
- You need large component set.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want theming system.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or MUI better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and MUI at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or MUI?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and MUI at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or MUI run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. MUI runs on Web.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what MUI is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that MUI cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. MUI covers Large component set, Theming system, Accessibility, TypeScript support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceMUI: Is MUI free?
The core library is open source and free. Advanced components, including the full-featured data grid, require a paid licence.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceMUI: Can MUI look non-Material?
Yes, through the theming system, but a substantial departure takes real work. Teams wanting full design control often prefer unstyled primitives instead.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceMUI: Does MUI handle accessibility?
Components follow WAI-ARIA patterns by default, which is a large part of why teams adopt it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Chakra UI
- Blacksmith vs Radix UI
- Blacksmith vs shadcn/ui
- Blacksmith vs Tailwind CSS
- Blacksmith vs Bootstrap
- Blacksmith vs React
- Blacksmith vs Lit
- Blacksmith vs v0 by Vercel
- Blacksmith vs Docusaurus
- Blacksmith vs Preact
- Blacksmith vs SolidJS
- Blacksmith vs MySQL
- Blacksmith vs Sass
- Blacksmith vs Spring Boot
- Blacksmith vs Strikingly
- Blacksmith vs Svelte
- Blacksmith vs Turbopack
- MUI vs WarpBuild
- MUI vs Depot
- MUI vs Namespace
- MUI vs Earthly
- MUI vs Nx Cloud
- MUI vs OpsLevel
- MUI vs Garden
- MUI vs ConfigCat
- MUI vs Dagger
- MUI vs Nix
- MUI vs Rust
- MUI vs Ansible
- MUI vs PartyKit
- MUI vs PhpStorm
- MUI vs Pieces for Developers
- MUI vs RAD Studio
- MUI vs Refact
- MUI vs Chakra UI
- MUI vs Radix UI
- MUI vs shadcn/ui
- MUI vs Tailwind CSS
- MUI vs Bootstrap
- MUI vs React
- MUI vs Lit
- MUI vs v0 by Vercel
- MUI vs Docusaurus
- MUI vs Preact
- MUI vs SolidJS
- MUI vs MySQL
- MUI vs Sass
- MUI vs Spring Boot
- MUI vs Strikingly
- MUI vs Svelte
- MUI vs Turbopack
