Softwr

Web Development · head to head

MUI vs SolidJS

MUI logo

MUI

Web Development

React component library implementing Material Design

From
Free
Rated
-
SolidJS logo

SolidJS

Web Development

Reactive JavaScript framework with no virtual DOM

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: MUI escaping the Material Design look takes more theming effort than teams expect; SolidJS much smaller ecosystem than React, so many problems have no off-the-shelf library
  • They diverge on capability: MUI covers Large component set, SolidJS covers No virtual DOM.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which MUI and SolidJS actually diverge.

Attributes where MUI and SolidJS differ
AttributeMUISolidJS
Pricing modelOpen-source core with paid tiers for advanced componentsOpen source, no licence fee

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Web Development).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in MUI

  • Large component set
  • Theming system
  • Accessibility
  • TypeScript support

Only in SolidJS

  • No virtual DOM
  • Components run once
  • JSX syntax
  • Small bundles

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

MUI

  • Building an admin or internal application quickly with components that already worknot SolidJS
  • Teams needing accessible complex widgets without building themnot SolidJS
  • Products where Material Design is an acceptable or desired starting pointnot SolidJS

SolidJS

  • Interfaces where update performance is the binding constraintnot MUI
  • Teams comfortable with React syntax who want finer-grained reactivitynot MUI
  • Applications where bundle size directly affects the businessnot MUI

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

MUI

  • Escaping the Material Design look takes more theming effort than teams expect
  • Bundle size is significant, and careless imports pull in far more than needed
  • Advanced components such as the full data grid require a paid licence
  • Major version upgrades have historically required real migration work

SolidJS

  • Much smaller ecosystem than React, so many problems have no off-the-shelf library
  • The React-like syntax is misleading: components run once, and React habits produce subtle bugs
  • Smaller hiring pool and fewer learning resources than the mainstream frameworks

Pricing, plan by plan

MUI

Free
  • CommunityFree
    • Core component library
    • Theming
    • Community support

SolidJS

Free
  • SolidJSFree
    • Full library
    • Commercial use permitted
    • No usage limits

Which should you pick?

Choose MUI if

  • You need large component set.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want theming system.

Choose SolidJS if

  • You need no virtual dom.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want components run once.

Questions people ask

Is MUI or SolidJS better?
Neither clearly leads. MUI starts at Free and SolidJS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, MUI or SolidJS?
MUI starts at Free and SolidJS at Free.
Does MUI or SolidJS run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
Can I use MUI for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is MUI best used for?
MUI is most often used for building an admin or internal application quickly with components that already work, teams needing accessible complex widgets without building them, products where material design is an acceptable or desired starting point. Of those, building an admin or internal application quickly with components that already work and teams needing accessible complex widgets without building them are not what SolidJS is typically brought in for.
What can MUI do that SolidJS cannot?
MUI covers Large component set, Theming system, Accessibility, TypeScript support. SolidJS covers No virtual DOM, Components run once, JSX syntax, Small bundles.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

MUI: Is MUI free?

The core library is open source and free. Advanced components, including the full-featured data grid, require a paid licence.

SolidJS: Is SolidJS free?

Yes, open source under the MIT licence.

MUI: Can MUI look non-Material?

Yes, through the theming system, but a substantial departure takes real work. Teams wanting full design control often prefer unstyled primitives instead.

SolidJS: Is SolidJS just React without the virtual DOM?

The syntax is similar but the model is not. Solid components run once and reactivity is fine-grained, so patterns that are correct in React can be wrong in Solid.

MUI: Does MUI handle accessibility?

Components follow WAI-ARIA patterns by default, which is a large part of why teams adopt it.

SolidJS: Why is SolidJS fast?

It compiles away much of the framework and updates individual DOM nodes directly, rather than re-rendering components and diffing a virtual DOM.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads