Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Preact

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Preact
Web Development
3kB alternative to React with the same modern API
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Preact compatibility through preact/compat is good but not total, and some React libraries break in ways that are hard to diagnose
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Preact covers 3kB runtime.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Preact actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Preact |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Web Development |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Preact
- 3kB runtime
- preact/compat
- Same modern API
- Fast rendering
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Preact
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Preact
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Preact
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Preact
Preact
- Embedded widgets that load inside someone else’s page and must stay smallnot Blacksmith
- Marketing and content sites where JavaScript payload affects Core Web Vitalsnot Blacksmith
- Applications targeting low-bandwidth or low-powered devicesnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Preact
- Compatibility through preact/compat is good but not total, and some React libraries break in ways that are hard to diagnose
- Behavioural differences from React exist in edge cases, particularly around event handling
- A much smaller community, so unusual problems have fewer existing answers than React
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Preact
Free- PreactFree
- Full library
- Commercial use permitted
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Preact if
- You need 3kb runtime.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want preact/compat.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Preact better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Preact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Preact?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Preact at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Preact run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Preact runs on Web.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Preact is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Preact cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Preact covers 3kB runtime, preact/compat, Same modern API, Fast rendering.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourcePreact: Is Preact free?
Yes, open source under the MIT licence.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourcePreact: Can I use React libraries with Preact?
Most, through the preact/compat layer. Compatibility is good but not complete, so libraries relying on React internals can break.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourcePreact: Why choose Preact over React?
Bundle size, almost always. If payload is not a binding constraint, React’s ecosystem is usually the better trade.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Restate
- Blacksmith vs RubyMine
- Blacksmith vs Soketi
- Blacksmith vs SonarQube
- Blacksmith vs Sourcegraph
- Blacksmith vs React
- Blacksmith vs SolidJS
- Blacksmith vs MUI
- Blacksmith vs Bootstrap
- Blacksmith vs esbuild
- Blacksmith vs Lit
- Blacksmith vs MySQL
- Blacksmith vs Docusaurus
- Blacksmith vs Vue.js
- Blacksmith vs Angular
- Blacksmith vs Radix UI
- Blacksmith vs shadcn/ui
- Blacksmith vs npm
- Blacksmith vs SolidStart
- Blacksmith vs TanStack Start
- Blacksmith vs Alpine.js
- Blacksmith vs Astro
- Blacksmith vs Carrd
- Preact vs WarpBuild
- Preact vs Depot
- Preact vs Namespace
- Preact vs Earthly
- Preact vs Nx Cloud
- Preact vs OpsLevel
- Preact vs Garden
- Preact vs ConfigCat
- Preact vs Dagger
- Preact vs Nix
- Preact vs Rust
- Preact vs Ansible
- Preact vs Refact
- Preact vs Restate
- Preact vs RubyMine
- Preact vs Soketi
- Preact vs SonarQube
- Preact vs Sourcegraph
- Preact vs React
- Preact vs SolidJS
- Preact vs MUI
- Preact vs Bootstrap
- Preact vs esbuild
- Preact vs Lit
- Preact vs MySQL
- Preact vs Docusaurus
- Preact vs Vue.js
- Preact vs Angular
- Preact vs Radix UI
- Preact vs shadcn/ui
- Preact vs npm
- Preact vs SolidStart
- Preact vs TanStack Start
- Preact vs Alpine.js
- Preact vs Astro
- Preact vs Carrd
