Developer Tools · head to head
Depot vs Selenium

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Selenium
Testing
Browser automation framework and the W3C WebDriver standard
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development; Selenium flaky tests are the standing complaint: explicit waits and synchronisation are the tester’s job, where newer tools handle it automatically
- They diverge on capability: Depot covers Depot CI, Selenium covers W3C WebDriver.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Depot and Selenium actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
Only in Selenium
- W3C WebDriver
- Many language bindings
- Selenium Grid
- Broad browser support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot Selenium
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot Selenium
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot Selenium
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot Selenium
Selenium
- Cross-browser testing where Safari and legacy browsers must be coverednot Depot
- Teams whose test suites are written in Java or C# rather than JavaScriptnot Depot
- Distributing a large suite across a grid of machinesnot Depot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
Selenium
- Flaky tests are the standing complaint: explicit waits and synchronisation are the tester’s job, where newer tools handle it automatically
- Setup involves drivers, versions and grid infrastructure that Playwright and Cypress bundle away
- Slower to run than tools that talk to browsers over a debugging protocol rather than WebDriver
Pricing, plan by plan
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
Selenium
Free- SeleniumFree
- Full functionality
- Unlimited tests
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Choose Selenium if
- You need w3c webdriver.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- You also want many language bindings.
Questions people ask
- Is Depot or Selenium better?
- Neither clearly leads. Depot starts at Free and Selenium at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Depot or Selenium?
- Depot starts at Free and Selenium at Free.
- Does Depot or Selenium run on more platforms?
- Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI. Selenium runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Depot best used for?
- Depot is most often used for accelerating docker builds for container-based development, replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure, distributing cache across monorepo builds, debugging failed ci builds interactively with ssh. Of those, accelerating docker builds for container-based development and replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure are not what Selenium is typically brought in for.
- What can Depot do that Selenium cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching. Selenium covers W3C WebDriver, Many language bindings, Selenium Grid, Broad browser support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceSelenium: Is Selenium free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee. Paid costs come from grid infrastructure or services like BrowserStack.
Depot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceSelenium: Selenium or Playwright?
Playwright handles waiting automatically and is faster to set up, which removes most flakiness complaints. Selenium wins on language breadth, browser coverage including Safari, and existing suites you already have.
Depot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceSelenium: Is Selenium still relevant?
Yes. Its WebDriver protocol is a W3C standard implemented by every major browser, and very large existing suites are not rewritten cheaply.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Depot vs Visual Studio Code
- Depot vs ESLint
- Depot vs pnpm
- Depot vs Turborepo
- Depot vs GitHub Copilot
- Depot vs Penpot
- Depot vs Keycloak
- Depot vs Rust
- Depot vs CLion
- Depot vs GNAT Pro
- Depot vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Depot vs GNU Emacs
- Depot vs Keil MDK
- Depot vs Vite
- Depot vs Bazel
- Depot vs CodeSandbox
- Depot vs Eclipse IDE
- Depot vs Moonrepo
- Depot vs CircleCI
- Depot vs Insomnia
- Depot vs BrowserStack
- Depot vs BugHerd
- Depot vs Cypress
- Depot vs Playwright
- Depot vs GitHub Actions
- Depot vs Puppeteer
- Depot vs Vitest
- Depot vs Zephyr Scale
- Selenium vs Visual Studio Code
- Selenium vs ESLint
- Selenium vs pnpm
- Selenium vs Turborepo
- Selenium vs GitHub Copilot
- Selenium vs Penpot
- Selenium vs Keycloak
- Selenium vs Rust
- Selenium vs CLion
- Selenium vs GNAT Pro
- Selenium vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Selenium vs GNU Emacs
- Selenium vs Keil MDK
- Selenium vs Vite
- Selenium vs Bazel
- Selenium vs CodeSandbox
- Selenium vs Eclipse IDE
- Selenium vs Moonrepo
- Selenium vs CircleCI
- Selenium vs Insomnia
- Selenium vs BrowserStack
- Selenium vs BugHerd
- Selenium vs Cypress
- Selenium vs Playwright
- Selenium vs GitHub Actions
- Selenium vs Puppeteer
- Selenium vs Vitest
- Selenium vs Zephyr Scale
