Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Mode

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Mode
Business Intelligence
Collaborative analytics for data teams
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Blacksmith is a GitHub Actions runner service; Mode is a collaborative analytics platform.
- Free plans on both; paid from $0.004/mo and $65/mo.
- Only Blacksmith lists bare metal runners; only Mode lists SQL Editor.
- Where Blacksmith falls short: per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs.
- Where Mode falls short: free tier limited to 4GB RAM and 1 CPU for SQL notebooks, insufficient for large datasets.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Mode actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Mode |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Business Intelligence |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: pricing model for Blacksmith, founded for Blacksmith.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Mode
- SQL Editor
- Python/R Notebooks
- Interactive Reports
- Version Control
- Scheduling
- Snowflake
- Redshift
- BigQuery
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Mode
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Mode
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Mode
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Mode
Mode
- Self-service analyticsnot Blacksmith
- Data explorationnot Blacksmith
- Ad-hoc reportingnot Blacksmith
- Collaborative analysisnot Blacksmith
- Embedded analyticsnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Mode
- Free tier limited to 4GB RAM and 1 CPU for SQL notebooks, insufficient for large datasets
- Requires SQL knowledge for most analysis tasks, creating dependency on technical resources
- Paid plan pricing not publicly listed; requires sales consultation
- Recently acquired by ThoughtSpot in 2026, creating product direction uncertainty
- Limited customization options for visual aspects and embedded analytics
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Mode
Free- FreeFree
- SQL Editor
- Python/R Notebooks
- Basic Charts
- Business$65/mo
- Advanced Visualizations
- Collaboration
- Integrations
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Mode if
- You need sql editor.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want python/r notebooks.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Mode better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Mode at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Mode?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Mode at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Mode run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Mode runs on Web.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Mode is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Mode cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Mode covers SQL Editor, Python/R Notebooks, Interactive Reports, Version Control.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceMode: What languages does Mode support for analysis?
Mode notebooks support SQL, Python (3.11 with pandas, NumPy, scikit-learn, matplotlib), and R (4.2.0 with ggplot2, dplyr, tidyr). Both Python and R allow additional library installation at runtime.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceMode: Can I integrate Mode notebook results into reports?
Yes. Mode allows adding notebook cell results directly to reports, with synchronized scheduling so reports re-run to keep data current.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceMode: Does Mode support collaborative analysis?
Yes. Mode notebooks provide moveable code blocks and markdown cells enabling exploratory analysis and team collaboration on data queries and visualizations.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Jenkins
- Blacksmith vs Kubernetes
- Blacksmith vs GitLab
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs LaunchDarkly
- Blacksmith vs Terraform
- Blacksmith vs GitHub
- Blacksmith vs GoLand
- Blacksmith vs Hookdeck
- Blacksmith vs Istio
- Blacksmith vs JFrog Artifactory
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Nixpacks
- Blacksmith vs Periscope Data
- Blacksmith vs Domo
- Blacksmith vs Fabi
- Blacksmith vs Deepnote
- Blacksmith vs Yellowfin
- Blacksmith vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Blacksmith vs Hex
- Blacksmith vs PostHog
- Blacksmith vs GoodData
- Blacksmith vs Grow
- Blacksmith vs Mixpanel
- Blacksmith vs Pendo
- Blacksmith vs Chartio
- Blacksmith vs ChartMogul
- Blacksmith vs Dundas BI
- Blacksmith vs Exa
- Blacksmith vs Glassbox
- Blacksmith vs Glean
- Mode vs WarpBuild
- Mode vs Depot
- Mode vs Namespace
- Mode vs Jenkins
- Mode vs Kubernetes
- Mode vs GitLab
- Mode vs Earthly
- Mode vs Nx Cloud
- Mode vs OpsLevel
- Mode vs LaunchDarkly
- Mode vs Terraform
- Mode vs GitHub
- Mode vs GoLand
- Mode vs Hookdeck
- Mode vs Istio
- Mode vs JFrog Artifactory
- Mode vs Nix
- Mode vs Nixpacks
- Mode vs Periscope Data
- Mode vs Domo
- Mode vs Fabi
- Mode vs Deepnote
- Mode vs Yellowfin
- Mode vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Mode vs Hex
- Mode vs PostHog
- Mode vs GoodData
- Mode vs Grow
- Mode vs Mixpanel
- Mode vs Pendo
- Mode vs Chartio
- Mode vs ChartMogul
- Mode vs Dundas BI
- Mode vs Exa
- Mode vs Glassbox
- Mode vs Glean
