Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Memcached

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Memcached actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Memcached |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee; managed cloud billed separately |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted |
| Category | Developer Tools | Databases |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Memcached
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Memcached
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Memcached
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Memcached
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot Blacksmith
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot Blacksmith
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Memcached better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Memcached at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Memcached?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Memcached at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Memcached run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Memcached is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Memcached cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceMemcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Restate
- Blacksmith vs RubyMine
- Blacksmith vs Dragonfly
- Blacksmith vs Valkey
- Blacksmith vs Readyset
- Blacksmith vs PostgreSQL
- Blacksmith vs DuckDB
- Blacksmith vs DynamoDB
- Blacksmith vs NATS
- Blacksmith vs Apache Pulsar
- Blacksmith vs Presto
- Blacksmith vs Timeplus
- Blacksmith vs RabbitMQ
- Blacksmith vs EMQX
- Blacksmith vs FaunaDB
- Blacksmith vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Blacksmith vs MotherDuck
- Blacksmith vs Neo4j
- Blacksmith vs Apache Kafka
- Blacksmith vs Firestore
- Memcached vs WarpBuild
- Memcached vs Depot
- Memcached vs Namespace
- Memcached vs Earthly
- Memcached vs Nx Cloud
- Memcached vs OpsLevel
- Memcached vs Garden
- Memcached vs ConfigCat
- Memcached vs Dagger
- Memcached vs Nix
- Memcached vs Rust
- Memcached vs Ansible
- Memcached vs PhpStorm
- Memcached vs Pieces for Developers
- Memcached vs RAD Studio
- Memcached vs Refact
- Memcached vs Restate
- Memcached vs RubyMine
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore
