Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Google Cloud SQL

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Google Cloud SQL
Databases
Fully managed relational database service for MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Blacksmith is a GitHub Actions runner service.
- Free plans on both; paid from $0.004/mo and $25/mo.
- Only Blacksmith lists bare metal runners; only Google Cloud SQL lists high Availability.
- Where Blacksmith falls short: per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs.
- Where Google Cloud SQL falls short: locked into Google Cloud ecosystem with limited cross-cloud portability.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Google Cloud SQL actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Google Cloud SQL |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Databases |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: pricing model for Blacksmith, founded for Blacksmith.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Google Cloud SQL
- High Availability
- Automated Backups
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Encryption
- Regional/Zonal Instances
- Read Replicas
- Private IP
- BigQuery
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Google Cloud SQL
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Google Cloud SQL
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Google Cloud SQL
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Google Cloud SQL
Google Cloud SQL
- Transaction processingnot Blacksmith
- Data storagenot Blacksmith
- Application backendnot Blacksmith
- Reportingnot Blacksmith
- Data analyticsnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Google Cloud SQL
- Locked into Google Cloud ecosystem with limited cross-cloud portability
- Pay-as-you-go pricing can become expensive with unpredictable workloads
- Limited customization options compared to self-managed databases
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Google Cloud SQL
Free- Free TierFree
- db-f1-micro instance
- 30GB storage
- Limited usage
- Standard$25/mo
- High availability
- Automated backups
- Point-in-time recovery
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Google Cloud SQL if
- You need high availability.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automated backups.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Google Cloud SQL better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Google Cloud SQL at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Google Cloud SQL?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Google Cloud SQL at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Google Cloud SQL run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Google Cloud SQL runs on Web.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Google Cloud SQL is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Google Cloud SQL cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Google Cloud SQL covers High Availability, Automated Backups, Point-in-time Recovery, Encryption.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceGoogle Cloud SQL: What database engines does Google Cloud SQL support?
Google Cloud SQL supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server. Users can choose their preferred engine when provisioning an instance and Google handles automated backups, replication, patching, and scaling.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceGoogle Cloud SQL: Does Google Cloud SQL have a free tier?
Google Cloud SQL does not have a free tier, though new users receive free trial credits from Google Cloud Platform. Pricing is based on compute resources (CPU and memory) and storage used, with options for committed use discounts.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceGoogle Cloud SQL: Can Google Cloud SQL scale automatically?
Yes. Cloud SQL automatically scales database storage and compute resources to handle increased workloads without manual intervention, and includes automated backups and high availability configurations.
SourceRelated pages
More on Google Cloud SQL
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Jenkins
- Blacksmith vs Kubernetes
- Blacksmith vs GitLab
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs LaunchDarkly
- Blacksmith vs Terraform
- Blacksmith vs GitHub
- Blacksmith vs GoLand
- Blacksmith vs Hookdeck
- Blacksmith vs Istio
- Blacksmith vs JFrog Artifactory
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Nixpacks
- Blacksmith vs Amazon RDS
- Blacksmith vs Azure SQL
- Blacksmith vs Cockroach Labs
- Blacksmith vs Aiven
- Blacksmith vs PostgreSQL
- Blacksmith vs MariaDB
- Blacksmith vs DataStax
- Blacksmith vs Typesense
- Blacksmith vs Valkey
- Blacksmith vs Apache Doris
- Blacksmith vs Apache Hadoop
- Blacksmith vs Apache Spark
- Blacksmith vs Amazon Aurora
- Blacksmith vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Blacksmith vs Postgres
- Blacksmith vs Apache Solr
- Blacksmith vs Amazon Redshift
- Blacksmith vs CosmosDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs WarpBuild
- Google Cloud SQL vs Depot
- Google Cloud SQL vs Namespace
- Google Cloud SQL vs Jenkins
- Google Cloud SQL vs Kubernetes
- Google Cloud SQL vs GitLab
- Google Cloud SQL vs Earthly
- Google Cloud SQL vs Nx Cloud
- Google Cloud SQL vs OpsLevel
- Google Cloud SQL vs LaunchDarkly
- Google Cloud SQL vs Terraform
- Google Cloud SQL vs GitHub
- Google Cloud SQL vs GoLand
- Google Cloud SQL vs Hookdeck
- Google Cloud SQL vs Istio
- Google Cloud SQL vs JFrog Artifactory
- Google Cloud SQL vs Nix
- Google Cloud SQL vs Nixpacks
- Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon RDS
- Google Cloud SQL vs Azure SQL
- Google Cloud SQL vs Cockroach Labs
- Google Cloud SQL vs Aiven
- Google Cloud SQL vs PostgreSQL
- Google Cloud SQL vs MariaDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs DataStax
- Google Cloud SQL vs Typesense
- Google Cloud SQL vs Valkey
- Google Cloud SQL vs Apache Doris
- Google Cloud SQL vs Apache Hadoop
- Google Cloud SQL vs Apache Spark
- Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon Aurora
- Google Cloud SQL vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Google Cloud SQL vs Postgres
- Google Cloud SQL vs Apache Solr
- Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon Redshift
- Google Cloud SQL vs CosmosDB
