Energy · head to head
Bently Nevada System 1 vs Helioscope

Bently Nevada System 1
Energy
Machinery condition monitoring software for critical rotating equipment protected by Bently Nevada hardware
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bently Nevada System 1 system 1 assumes Bently Nevada hardware; connected to third-party protection systems it loses access to the dynamic and transient data that is the entire reason to buy it, so the software choice is really made when the racks are specified.; Helioscope licences are single user, so each designer needs their own
- They diverge on capability: Bently Nevada System 1 covers Turbomachinery plot set, Helioscope covers PV system design.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bently Nevada System 1 and Helioscope actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bently Nevada System 1 | Helioscope |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $159/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Windows, Web, On-premise | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bently Nevada System 1
- Turbomachinery plot set
- Transient capture
- 3500 and Orbit 60 integration
- Decision support
- Data diode support
- Process data correlation
Only in Helioscope
- PV system design
- 3D shade modeling
- Performance simulation
- Single-line diagrams
- BOM generation
- Proposal templates
- Component database
- Financial modeling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bently Nevada System 1
- A refinery with API 670 protected compressor trains needing transient startup data captured and analysed, which general vibration platforms cannot donot Helioscope
- An LNG plant where a single unplanned compressor trip costs more than the entire monitoring programmenot Helioscope
- A power station correlating turbine vibration with process conditions to distinguish a real fault from a load-related responsenot Helioscope
- An offshore operator using remote diagnostics because there is no rotating machinery specialist on the installationnot Helioscope
Helioscope
- Solar project design and modelingnot Bently Nevada System 1
- Rooftop, carport, and ground-mount solar system planningnot Bently Nevada System 1
- Financial analysis and sales proposal generation for solar installationsnot Bently Nevada System 1
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bently Nevada System 1
- System 1 assumes Bently Nevada hardware; connected to third-party protection systems it loses access to the dynamic and transient data that is the entire reason to buy it, so the software choice is really made when the racks are specified.
- It is priced by machine train, which makes it appropriate for a dozen critical machines and prohibitively expensive as a plant-wide condition monitoring system for balance-of-plant equipment.
- Reading the output well needs a rotating machinery specialist; orbit and shaft centreline plots are not self-explanatory, and a site without that skill will either buy the Baker Hughes remote monitoring service or under-use the software.
- The annual support and upgrade contract is a continuing cost that must be maintained to stay on supported versions, and lapsing it on a system tied to safety-relevant protection hardware is not a realistic saving.
- Nothing about pricing is published and the product is sold as part of a machinery relationship with Baker Hughes, so competitive tension at renewal is limited once the hardware is installed.
Helioscope
- Licences are single user, so each designer needs their own
- Projects are capped at 10 a month on both Basic and Pro
- System size is capped by plan, at 1.25 MW DC on Basic and 5 MW on Pro, so a larger array forces an upgrade regardless of project count
- Trackers, LIDAR modelling and API access sit on the higher tiers
- Enterprise is priced per project with no published figure
Pricing, plan by plan
Bently Nevada System 1
On request- System 1$undefined/year
- Priced by machine train and connected data source
- Bently Nevada protection hardware assumed or purchased alongside
- Annual software support and upgrade contract sold separately
Helioscope
$159/month- Basic$159/month
- 1 user per license
- 10 projects per month (120 per year)
- 15% discount for annual billing ($1,620/year)
- Pro$259/month
- 1 user per license
- 10 projects per month (120 per year)
- 15% discount for annual billing ($2,640/year)
- Enterprise$null/month
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited projects
- Custom pricing
Which should you pick?
Choose Bently Nevada System 1 if
- You need turbomachinery plot set.
- You work on Windows, Web, On-premise.
- You also want transient capture.
Choose Helioscope if
- You need pv system design.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want 3d shade modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is Bently Nevada System 1 or Helioscope better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bently Nevada System 1 starts at On request and Helioscope at $159/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bently Nevada System 1 or Helioscope?
- Bently Nevada System 1 starts at On request and Helioscope at $159/month.
- Does Bently Nevada System 1 or Helioscope run on more platforms?
- Bently Nevada System 1 runs on Windows, Web, On-premise. Helioscope runs on Web, Api.
- What is Bently Nevada System 1 best used for?
- Bently Nevada System 1 is most often used for a refinery with api 670 protected compressor trains needing transient startup data captured and analysed, which general vibration platforms cannot do, an lng plant where a single unplanned compressor trip costs more than the entire monitoring programme, a power station correlating turbine vibration with process conditions to distinguish a real fault from a load-related response, an offshore operator using remote diagnostics because there is no rotating machinery specialist on the installation. Of those, a refinery with api 670 protected compressor trains needing transient startup data captured and analysed, which general vibration platforms cannot do and an lng plant where a single unplanned compressor trip costs more than the entire monitoring programme are not what Helioscope is typically brought in for.
- What can Bently Nevada System 1 do that Helioscope cannot?
- Bently Nevada System 1 covers Turbomachinery plot set, Transient capture, 3500 and Orbit 60 integration, Decision support. Helioscope covers PV system design, 3D shade modeling, Performance simulation, Single-line diagrams.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bently Nevada System 1: Do I need Bently Nevada hardware?
Practically, yes. System 1 can take some third-party inputs but the dynamic and transient data that justify it come from 3500 or Orbit 60 racks.
Helioscope: What is the starting price for HelioScope?
HelioScope Basic plan costs $159 per month per license with annual billing at $1,620/year (15% discount). The Pro plan is $259/month or $2,640/year. Each license covers 1 user. Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceBently Nevada System 1: Is System 1 suitable for all my plant motors?
No. It is priced and designed for critical machine trains. Balance-of-plant motors are far better served by a general condition monitoring platform.
Helioscope: How many projects can I design monthly with HelioScope Basic and Pro?
Both Basic and Pro plans include 10 projects per month, equaling 120 projects per year. The project allocation is the same across both tiers; the difference is in design capability (1.25 MW for Basic vs. 5 MW for Pro). Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceBently Nevada System 1: What does Orbit 60 add?
A newer protection platform with SIL certification and a built-in data diode, which removes the network security objection to connecting protection systems.
Helioscope: What is the maximum solar design capacity by HelioScope tier?
HelioScope Basic supports designs up to 1.25 MW DC, Pro supports up to 5 MW DC, and Enterprise supports unlimited designs up to 30 MW DC. Accuracy within 1% of PVsyst modeling is maintained across tiers. Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceBently Nevada System 1: Can Baker Hughes monitor the machines for me?
Yes, remote machinery diagnostic services are offered, which is how many sites without an in-house specialist actually consume System 1.
Related pages
More on Bently Nevada System 1
Other head to heads
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs AVEVA PI System
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Novity
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Enphase Enlighten
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs ABB Ability
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Cognite Data Fusion
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs SolarWinds
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Emerson Ovation
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Enerex
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs SMA Energy
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs SunPower Monitoring
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs EnergyCAP
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs ETAP
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Fluence Energy Management
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs GE Digital GridOS
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Itron
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Aurora Solar
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Stem Athena
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs AutoGrid Flex
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Influx Energy Management
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs OpenLink Endur
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Oracle Utilities
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Petrel E&P Software
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Siemens EnergyIP
- Helioscope vs AVEVA PI System
- Helioscope vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Helioscope vs Novity
- Helioscope vs Enphase Enlighten
- Helioscope vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Helioscope vs ABB Ability
- Helioscope vs Cognite Data Fusion
- Helioscope vs SolarWinds
- Helioscope vs Emerson Ovation
- Helioscope vs Enerex
- Helioscope vs SMA Energy
- Helioscope vs SunPower Monitoring
- Helioscope vs EnergyCAP
- Helioscope vs ETAP
- Helioscope vs Fluence Energy Management
- Helioscope vs GE Digital GridOS
- Helioscope vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Helioscope vs Itron
- Helioscope vs Aurora Solar
- Helioscope vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Helioscope vs Stem Athena
- Helioscope vs AutoGrid Flex
- Helioscope vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Helioscope vs Influx Energy Management
- Helioscope vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- Helioscope vs OpenLink Endur
- Helioscope vs Oracle Utilities
- Helioscope vs Petrel E&P Software
- Helioscope vs Siemens EnergyIP

