Energy · head to head
ETAP vs Helioscope

ETAP
Energy
Electrical power system design and analysis software
- From
- $5000/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ETAP no pricing is published, and reaching a figure requires completing a multi step quote form; Helioscope licences are single user, so each designer needs their own
- They diverge on capability: ETAP covers Load flow analysis, Helioscope covers PV system design.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ETAP and Helioscope actually diverge.
| Attribute | ETAP | Helioscope |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $5000/year | $159/month |
| Platforms | Windows, Api | Web, Api |
| Founded | 1986 | 2012 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ETAP
- Load flow analysis
- Short circuit analysis
- Arc flash analysis
- Protective device coordination
- Harmonics analysis
- Transient stability
- Cable sizing
- Panel schedule design
Only in Helioscope
- PV system design
- 3D shade modeling
- Performance simulation
- Single-line diagrams
- BOM generation
- Proposal templates
- Component database
- Financial modeling
Both cover
- Cloud deployment
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ETAP
- Electrical power system modelling, simulation and analysisnot Helioscope
- Arc flash, load flow and protection coordination studiesnot Helioscope
Helioscope
- Solar project design and modelingnot ETAP
- Rooftop, carport, and ground-mount solar system planningnot ETAP
- Financial analysis and sales proposal generation for solar installationsnot ETAP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ETAP
- No pricing is published, and reaching a figure requires completing a multi step quote form
- Subscription durations offered are 3 years and 5 years, so there is no short commitment option
- Licences are banded by user count rather than sold individually, in brackets of 1, 5 to 15, 15 to 25, 25 to 50 and over 50
- National and international network licences are priced separately
Helioscope
- Licences are single user, so each designer needs their own
- Projects are capped at 10 a month on both Basic and Pro
- System size is capped by plan, at 1.25 MW DC on Basic and 5 MW on Pro, so a larger array forces an upgrade regardless of project count
- Trackers, LIDAR modelling and API access sit on the higher tiers
- Enterprise is priced per project with no published figure
Pricing, plan by plan
ETAP
$5000/year- Standard$5000/year
- Load flow analysis
- Short circuit analysis
- Arc flash analysis
- Professional$15000/year
- Advanced analysis
- Protective device coordination
- Harmonics analysis
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Real-time monitoring
- SCADA integration
- Custom modules
Helioscope
$159/month- Basic$159/month
- 1 user per license
- 10 projects per month (120 per year)
- 15% discount for annual billing ($1,620/year)
- Pro$259/month
- 1 user per license
- 10 projects per month (120 per year)
- 15% discount for annual billing ($2,640/year)
- Enterprise$null/month
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited projects
- Custom pricing
Which should you pick?
Choose ETAP if
- You need load flow analysis.
- You work on Windows, Api.
- You also want short circuit analysis.
Choose Helioscope if
- You need pv system design.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want 3d shade modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is ETAP or Helioscope better?
- Neither clearly leads. ETAP starts at $5000/year and Helioscope at $159/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ETAP or Helioscope?
- ETAP starts at $5000/year and Helioscope at $159/month.
- Does ETAP or Helioscope run on more platforms?
- ETAP runs on Windows, Api. Helioscope runs on Web, Api.
- What is ETAP best used for?
- ETAP is most often used for electrical power system modelling, simulation and analysis, arc flash, load flow and protection coordination studies. Of those, electrical power system modelling, simulation and analysis and arc flash, load flow and protection coordination studies are not what Helioscope is typically brought in for.
- What can ETAP do that Helioscope cannot?
- ETAP covers Load flow analysis, Short circuit analysis, Arc flash analysis, Protective device coordination. Helioscope covers PV system design, 3D shade modeling, Performance simulation, Single-line diagrams. Both handle Cloud deployment, Api support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ETAP: How is ETAP priced?
ETAP uses subscription-based pricing with tiered bundles (Launch, Grow, Scale) and optional add-ons. Specific prices are not published and require completing a quote request form.
SourceHelioscope: What is the starting price for HelioScope?
HelioScope Basic plan costs $159 per month per license with annual billing at $1,620/year (15% discount). The Pro plan is $259/month or $2,640/year. Each license covers 1 user. Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceETAP: What products does ETAP offer pricing for?
ETAP offers three main product lines with tiered bundles: CANECO (Electrical Design), ETAP (Power Systems Analysis), and SEE Electrical (Electrical Engineering). Each supports 1-50+ users with 3-5 year term options.
SourceHelioscope: How many projects can I design monthly with HelioScope Basic and Pro?
Both Basic and Pro plans include 10 projects per month, equaling 120 projects per year. The project allocation is the same across both tiers; the difference is in design capability (1.25 MW for Basic vs. 5 MW for Pro). Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceHelioscope: What is the maximum solar design capacity by HelioScope tier?
HelioScope Basic supports designs up to 1.25 MW DC, Pro supports up to 5 MW DC, and Enterprise supports unlimited designs up to 30 MW DC. Accuracy within 1% of PVsyst modeling is maintained across tiers. Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- ETAP vs ABB Ability
- ETAP vs Aurora Solar
- ETAP vs Enphase Enlighten
- ETAP vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- ETAP vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- ETAP vs HOMER Energy
- ETAP vs Trane Tracer Building Management
- ETAP vs Azelio Energy Storage
- ETAP vs Emerson Ovation
- ETAP vs Proxibel Grid Suite
- ETAP vs Siemens Spectrum Power
- ETAP vs GE Digital Grid Software
- ETAP vs Fluence Energy Management
- ETAP vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- ETAP vs Itron
- ETAP vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- ETAP vs Novity
- ETAP vs GE Digital GridOS
- ETAP vs SolarWinds
- ETAP vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- ETAP vs Enerex
- ETAP vs Stem Athena
- ETAP vs AutoGrid Flex
- ETAP vs SMA Energy
- ETAP vs Influx Energy Management
- ETAP vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- ETAP vs OpenLink Endur
- ETAP vs Oracle Utilities
- ETAP vs Petrel E&P Software
- ETAP vs Siemens EnergyIP
- Helioscope vs ABB Ability
- Helioscope vs Aurora Solar
- Helioscope vs Enphase Enlighten
- Helioscope vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Helioscope vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Helioscope vs HOMER Energy
- Helioscope vs Trane Tracer Building Management
- Helioscope vs Azelio Energy Storage
- Helioscope vs Emerson Ovation
- Helioscope vs Proxibel Grid Suite
- Helioscope vs Siemens Spectrum Power
- Helioscope vs GE Digital Grid Software
- Helioscope vs Fluence Energy Management
- Helioscope vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Helioscope vs Itron
- Helioscope vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Helioscope vs Novity
- Helioscope vs GE Digital GridOS
- Helioscope vs SolarWinds
- Helioscope vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Helioscope vs Enerex
- Helioscope vs Stem Athena
- Helioscope vs AutoGrid Flex
- Helioscope vs SMA Energy
- Helioscope vs Influx Energy Management
- Helioscope vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- Helioscope vs OpenLink Endur
- Helioscope vs Oracle Utilities
- Helioscope vs Petrel E&P Software
- Helioscope vs Siemens EnergyIP

