Energy · head to head
Cognite Data Fusion vs Helioscope

Cognite Data Fusion
Energy
Industrial data platform that contextualises OT, IT and engineering data into an asset-centric knowledge graph
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cognite Data Fusion the platform is only as good as the contextualisation work, and that mapping effort is a consulting project that regularly costs more than the first-year subscription.; Helioscope licences are single user, so each designer needs their own
- They diverge on capability: Cognite Data Fusion covers Asset-centric data model, Helioscope covers PV system design.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cognite Data Fusion and Helioscope actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cognite Data Fusion | Helioscope |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $159/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cognite Data Fusion
- Asset-centric data model
- Entity matching
- P&ID parsing
- 3D contextualisation
- Cognite Atlas AI
- Data workflows
- Open SDKs
- Extractors
Only in Helioscope
- PV system design
- 3D shade modeling
- Performance simulation
- Single-line diagrams
- BOM generation
- Proposal templates
- Component database
- Financial modeling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cognite Data Fusion
- An operator that wants engineers to find the drawing, the sensor trend and the last work order for a valve from one searchnot Helioscope
- A company standardising asset data across sites so an analytics team can build once and deploy to many plantsnot Helioscope
- An upstream operator building a production-optimisation model that needs sensor data joined to equipment metadatanot Helioscope
- A team replacing a stalled internal data-lake project where nobody could reconstruct what the tag names meantnot Helioscope
Helioscope
- Solar project design and modelingnot Cognite Data Fusion
- Rooftop, carport, and ground-mount solar system planningnot Cognite Data Fusion
- Financial analysis and sales proposal generation for solar installationsnot Cognite Data Fusion
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cognite Data Fusion
- The platform is only as good as the contextualisation work, and that mapping effort is a consulting project that regularly costs more than the first-year subscription.
- Pricing is consumption-based and unpublished, so costs move with data volume and usage patterns you cannot forecast well until a year in.
- It does not replace your historian, your ERP or your maintenance system, so Cognite is an additional recurring cost layered on systems you still pay for.
- The reference base and data model lean heavily towards Norwegian and wider oil, gas and process industries; discrete manufacturing fit is weaker and the local partner network thinner outside energy.
- Getting value out requires in-house Python and data engineering skill; organisations without a data team end up dependent on Cognite professional services for every new use case.
Helioscope
- Licences are single user, so each designer needs their own
- Projects are capped at 10 a month on both Basic and Pro
- System size is capped by plan, at 1.25 MW DC on Basic and 5 MW on Pro, so a larger array forces an upgrade regardless of project count
- Trackers, LIDAR modelling and API access sit on the higher tiers
- Enterprise is priced per project with no published figure
Pricing, plan by plan
Cognite Data Fusion
On request- Cognite Data Fusion$undefined/year
- Consumption-based pricing on data volume, compute and users
- Available through cloud marketplaces with private offers
- Contextualisation and onboarding quoted as a separate engagement
Helioscope
$159/month- Basic$159/month
- 1 user per license
- 10 projects per month (120 per year)
- 15% discount for annual billing ($1,620/year)
- Pro$259/month
- 1 user per license
- 10 projects per month (120 per year)
- 15% discount for annual billing ($2,640/year)
- Enterprise$null/month
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited projects
- Custom pricing
Which should you pick?
Choose Cognite Data Fusion if
- You need asset-centric data model.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want entity matching.
Choose Helioscope if
- You need pv system design.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want 3d shade modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is Cognite Data Fusion or Helioscope better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cognite Data Fusion starts at On request and Helioscope at $159/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cognite Data Fusion or Helioscope?
- Cognite Data Fusion starts at On request and Helioscope at $159/month.
- Does Cognite Data Fusion or Helioscope run on more platforms?
- Cognite Data Fusion runs on Web, Cloud. Helioscope runs on Web, Api.
- What is Cognite Data Fusion best used for?
- Cognite Data Fusion is most often used for an operator that wants engineers to find the drawing, the sensor trend and the last work order for a valve from one search, a company standardising asset data across sites so an analytics team can build once and deploy to many plants, an upstream operator building a production-optimisation model that needs sensor data joined to equipment metadata, a team replacing a stalled internal data-lake project where nobody could reconstruct what the tag names meant. Of those, an operator that wants engineers to find the drawing, the sensor trend and the last work order for a valve from one search and a company standardising asset data across sites so an analytics team can build once and deploy to many plants are not what Helioscope is typically brought in for.
- What can Cognite Data Fusion do that Helioscope cannot?
- Cognite Data Fusion covers Asset-centric data model, Entity matching, P&ID parsing, 3D contextualisation. Helioscope covers PV system design, 3D shade modeling, Performance simulation, Single-line diagrams.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cognite Data Fusion: Is Cognite a historian?
No. It reads from historians such as PI System and adds context. You still need the historian underneath.
Helioscope: What is the starting price for HelioScope?
HelioScope Basic plan costs $159 per month per license with annual billing at $1,620/year (15% discount). The Pro plan is $259/month or $2,640/year. Each license covers 1 user. Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceCognite Data Fusion: How is it priced?
Consumption-based on data, compute and users, quoted per customer. Nothing is published.
Helioscope: How many projects can I design monthly with HelioScope Basic and Pro?
Both Basic and Pro plans include 10 projects per month, equaling 120 projects per year. The project allocation is the same across both tiers; the difference is in design capability (1.25 MW for Basic vs. 5 MW for Pro). Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceCognite Data Fusion: How long does a deployment take?
First useful graph in a few months is realistic; full plant contextualisation across a site is typically a year or more.
Helioscope: What is the maximum solar design capacity by HelioScope tier?
HelioScope Basic supports designs up to 1.25 MW DC, Pro supports up to 5 MW DC, and Enterprise supports unlimited designs up to 30 MW DC. Accuracy within 1% of PVsyst modeling is maintained across tiers. Source: https://helioscope.aurorasolar.com/pricing
SourceCognite Data Fusion: Can we do the contextualisation ourselves?
Technically yes, the SDKs and matching tools are open, but most customers use Cognite or a partner for the first site.
Related pages
More on Cognite Data Fusion
Other head to heads
- Cognite Data Fusion vs AVEVA PI System
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Novity
- Cognite Data Fusion vs AutoGrid Flex
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Bidgely UtilityAI
- Cognite Data Fusion vs OATI webSmartEnergy
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Stem Athena
- Cognite Data Fusion vs ABB Ability
- Cognite Data Fusion vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Wood Mackenzie Lens
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Bently Nevada System 1
- Cognite Data Fusion vs SolarWinds
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Cognite Data Fusion vs OSIsoft PI System
- Cognite Data Fusion vs P2 Energy Solutions
- Cognite Data Fusion vs OATI webOASIS
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Aurora Solar
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Enphase Enlighten
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Enerex
- Cognite Data Fusion vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Cognite Data Fusion vs GE Digital GridOS
- Cognite Data Fusion vs SMA Energy
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Influx Energy Management
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- Cognite Data Fusion vs OpenLink Endur
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Oracle Utilities
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Petrel E&P Software
- Cognite Data Fusion vs Siemens EnergyIP
- Helioscope vs AVEVA PI System
- Helioscope vs Novity
- Helioscope vs AutoGrid Flex
- Helioscope vs Bidgely UtilityAI
- Helioscope vs OATI webSmartEnergy
- Helioscope vs Stem Athena
- Helioscope vs ABB Ability
- Helioscope vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Helioscope vs Wood Mackenzie Lens
- Helioscope vs Bently Nevada System 1
- Helioscope vs SolarWinds
- Helioscope vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Helioscope vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Helioscope vs OSIsoft PI System
- Helioscope vs P2 Energy Solutions
- Helioscope vs OATI webOASIS
- Helioscope vs Aurora Solar
- Helioscope vs Enphase Enlighten
- Helioscope vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Helioscope vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Helioscope vs Enerex
- Helioscope vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Helioscope vs GE Digital GridOS
- Helioscope vs SMA Energy
- Helioscope vs Influx Energy Management
- Helioscope vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- Helioscope vs OpenLink Endur
- Helioscope vs Oracle Utilities
- Helioscope vs Petrel E&P Software
- Helioscope vs Siemens EnergyIP

