Cybersecurity · head to head
Baffle vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)

Baffle
Cybersecurity
Transparent proxy that encrypts, tokenises and masks database fields without application code changes
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Developer Tools
Cloud development environments repositioned as a control plane for software engineering agents
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Baffle the proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.; Ona (formerly Gitpod) acquisition risk has already materialised: the company closed a sale to OpenAI on 10 August 2026 and now sits inside the Codex team, so nothing public guarantees pricing, continuity or neutrality between model vendors beyond honouring existing commitments.
- They diverge on capability: Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Ona (formerly Gitpod) covers Ephemeral environments.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Baffle and Ona (formerly Gitpod) actually diverge.
| Attribute | Baffle | Ona (formerly Gitpod) |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Per month by compute unit |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Linux, Web | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Baffle
- Transparent proxy deployment
- Field-level encryption
- Tokenisation
- Format-preserving de-identification
- Dynamic data masking
- Bring your own key
- Analytics and pipeline support
- AI pipeline protection
Only in Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Ephemeral environments
- Agent sessions
- Bring your own cloud
- Devcontainer standard
- Compute unit budgeting
- Enterprise identity
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Baffle
- A bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account datanot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- A company wanting to take a reporting database out of PCI scope by tokenising card fields before they landnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- A healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administernot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- A team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an AI retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobsnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setupnot Baffle
- Running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptopnot Baffle
- Keeping source code off contractor and offshore laptops by moving the whole environment into a controlled accountnot Baffle
- Reproducing a hard-to-configure toolchain for a short-lived project without polluting anyone machinenot Baffle
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Baffle
- The proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.
- What you can still do in SQL depends on the protection mode chosen, and stronger modes restrict comparisons, joins and aggregations on protected columns, which can quietly break existing reports and analytics.
- Database and driver coverage is finite, so an organisation with an unusual engine, an old driver or heavy use of stored procedures may find its most important system is exactly the one not supported.
- Pricing is unpublished and scales with protected data stores, which means an enterprise trying to protect a long tail of small databases pays disproportionately compared with protecting a handful of large ones.
- Key management is your responsibility under bring your own key, and while that is the correct security posture, it moves a real operational burden and a genuine data-loss risk onto the customer.
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Acquisition risk has already materialised: the company closed a sale to OpenAI on 10 August 2026 and now sits inside the Codex team, so nothing public guarantees pricing, continuity or neutrality between model vendors beyond honouring existing commitments.
- Two disruptive changes of direction inside a year, from development environments to agent orchestration and then from independence to acquisition, mean the product a browser IDE buyer originally chose no longer exists in that form.
- The Gitpod Classic sunset on 15 October 2025 required manual conversion of configuration, hand-moved secrets, self-rescued workspace data and a brand new account, which is the clearest available precedent for how the vendor handles deprecation.
- Community self-hosting is finished: the AGPL-3.0 repository is deprecated by its own README, and self-hosted now means a vendor-operated install in your AWS or GCP account, with no Azure, no on-premises and no air-gapped path.
- Pricing is difficult to model because it runs on a compute unit currency where subscription credits expire at the end of the month, the mapping from units to actual compute is not published on the pricing page, and Enterprise is quotation only.
Pricing, plan by plan
Baffle
On request- Baffle Data Protection Services$undefined/year
- Quoted by protected data stores and deployment scale
- Self-managed and cloud marketplace deployment options
- Annual subscription
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 parallel environments
- Machines up to 4 vCPU, 16 GB memory and 80 GB disk
- Ona Cloud multi-tenant only
- Core$20/month
- From 20 US dollars a month, up to 100 team members
- Includes 80 to 2,200 recurring compute units a month depending on tier
- Additional units from 10 US dollars per 40 units
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single-tenant deployment in your own AWS or GCP account
- SAML and OIDC single sign-on
- Dedicated account management and forward deployed engineers
Which should you pick?
Choose Baffle if
- You need transparent proxy deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want field-level encryption.
Choose Ona (formerly Gitpod) if
- You need ephemeral environments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform.
- You also want agent sessions.
Questions people ask
- Is Baffle or Ona (formerly Gitpod) better?
- Neither clearly leads. Baffle starts at On request and Ona (formerly Gitpod) at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Baffle or Ona (formerly Gitpod)?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Baffle and Free for Ona (formerly Gitpod).
- Does Baffle or Ona (formerly Gitpod) run on more platforms?
- Baffle runs on Linux, Web. Ona (formerly Gitpod) runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform.
- Can I use Ona (formerly Gitpod) for free?
- Yes. Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Baffle starts at On request.
- What is Baffle best used for?
- Baffle is most often used for a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data, a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land, a healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administer, a team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an ai retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobs. Of those, a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data and a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land are not what Ona (formerly Gitpod) is typically brought in for.
- What can Baffle do that Ona (formerly Gitpod) cannot?
- Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Field-level encryption, Tokenisation, Format-preserving de-identification. Ona (formerly Gitpod) covers Ephemeral environments, Agent sessions, Bring your own cloud, Devcontainer standard.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Baffle: Do applications need code changes?
No. That is the central design choice. Baffle intercepts traffic as a proxy rather than requiring an SDK call at every read and write.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): Is Gitpod still called Gitpod?
No. It rebranded to Ona in September 2025, and gitpod.io now redirects to ona.com. The company was acquired by OpenAI in a deal that closed on 10 August 2026.
Baffle: Can you still query encrypted columns?
Partly, and it depends on the protection mode. Some modes preserve equality matching and format, stronger modes restrict what SQL operations remain possible, so this must be tested against your actual queries.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): Can I still self-host it for free?
No. The AGPL-3.0 self-hosted project is deprecated by its own README. What is offered now is a vendor-operated single-tenant install in your AWS or GCP account on the Enterprise plan.
Baffle: Does it take systems out of PCI scope?
Tokenisation can reduce scope by ensuring card data never lands in the protected system, but scope reduction is an assessor judgement, not a product setting.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): What happened to Gitpod Classic?
Pay-as-you-go Classic was switched off on 15 October 2025. Migration required converting gitpod.yml to devcontainer.json, moving secrets by hand, downloading workspace data before the cutoff and creating a new account.
Baffle: Who holds the encryption keys?
You do, through your own key management service. Baffle supports bring your own key rather than holding customer keys itself.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): What does it cost?
Core starts at 20 US dollars a month and includes a monthly allowance of Ona Compute Units, with more from 10 dollars per 40 units. Subscription credits expire monthly. Enterprise is quoted.
Related pages
More on Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Other head to heads
- Baffle vs Very Good Security
- Baffle vs HashiCorp Vault
- Baffle vs 1Password
- Baffle vs LastPass
- Baffle vs Mullvad VPN
- Baffle vs Private Internet Access
- Baffle vs IVPN
- Baffle vs TunnelBear
- Baffle vs Enpass
- Baffle vs Passbolt
- Baffle vs Feedzai
- Baffle vs Genetec Security Center
- Baffle vs Tenable Nessus
- Baffle vs Transmit Security
- Baffle vs TrustArc
- Baffle vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Baffle vs VMware Carbon Black
- Baffle vs Wireshark
- Baffle vs Coder
- Baffle vs CodeSandbox
- Baffle vs StackBlitz
- Baffle vs Namespace
- Baffle vs Daytona
- Baffle vs Earthly
- Baffle vs Nixpacks
- Baffle vs Spacelift
- Baffle vs Atlantis
- Baffle vs Backstage
- Baffle vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Baffle vs ConfigCat
- Baffle vs Xlinesoft
- Baffle vs GNU Emacs
- Baffle vs Keil MDK
- Baffle vs Vite
- Baffle vs Bazel
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Very Good Security
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs HashiCorp Vault
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs 1Password
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs LastPass
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Mullvad VPN
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Private Internet Access
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs IVPN
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs TunnelBear
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Enpass
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Passbolt
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Feedzai
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Genetec Security Center
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Tenable Nessus
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Transmit Security
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs TrustArc
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Wireshark
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Coder
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs CodeSandbox
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs StackBlitz
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Namespace
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Daytona
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Earthly
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Nixpacks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Spacelift
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Atlantis
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Backstage
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs ConfigCat
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Xlinesoft
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs GNU Emacs
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Keil MDK
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Vite
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Bazel
