Software · head to head
Backendless vs RudderStack

Backendless
Software
Visual app development platform with REST APIs and cloud backend
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Backendless free tier limited to 50 API requests per minute and 20 database tables; RudderStack on the free plan data processing stops after a second consecutive overage rather than being billed, so exceeding 250,000 events twice breaks the pipeline
- They diverge on capability: Backendless covers REST API, RudderStack covers Data collection.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Backendless and RudderStack actually diverge.
| Attribute | Backendless | RudderStack |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | usage-based |
| Platforms | Cloud, Visual builder | Web, Self-hosted |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Backendless
- REST API
- Real-time database
- Cloud code
- Custom integrations
- Webhooks
- Cloud functions
- Cloud support
- Visual builder support
Only in RudderStack
- Data collection
- Event tracking
- Audience segmentation
- Warehouse ingestion
- Real-time sync
- Data transformation
- Privacy controls
- 200+ destinations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Backendless
- API Developmentnot RudderStack
- API Gatewaynot RudderStack
- API Testingnot RudderStack
- API Documentationnot RudderStack
- Microservicesnot RudderStack
RudderStack
- Collecting event data from apps and websites and routing it to warehouses and toolsnot Backendless
- Building a warehouse first customer data pipelinenot Backendless
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Backendless
- Free tier limited to 50 API requests per minute and 20 database tables
- Smaller community and integration ecosystem compared to Firebase or AWS
- Customization beyond codeless tools requires developer expertise
- Limited documentation for advanced use cases and edge cases
RudderStack
- On the free plan data processing stops after a second consecutive overage rather than being billed, so exceeding 250,000 events twice breaks the pipeline
- The free plan allows 250,000 events a month
- Growth starts at $265 a month for 1 million events, with volume sold in tiers up to 25 million
- Overage is charged as the gap to the next tier's price rather than per event, so a small excess costs a full tier step
Pricing, plan by plan
Backendless
Free- FreeFree
- 50 API requests/minute
- 20 database tables
- 1 GB file storage
- Scale Variable$15/month
- Unlimited API requests/month
- 100 database tables
- 10 GB file storage
- Scale Fixed$15/month
- Same as Scale Variable
- Fixed monthly pricing
RudderStack
Free- Open SourceFree
- Self-hosted
- Community support
- Cloud$100/month
- Cloud hosted
- Email support
- Enterprise$500/month
- Dedicated support
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Backendless if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Visual builder.
- You also want real-time database.
Choose RudderStack if
- You need data collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want event tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Backendless or RudderStack better?
- Neither clearly leads. Backendless starts at Free and RudderStack at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Backendless or RudderStack?
- Backendless starts at Free and RudderStack at Free.
- Does Backendless or RudderStack run on more platforms?
- Backendless runs on Cloud, Visual builder. RudderStack runs on Web, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Backendless for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Backendless best used for?
- Backendless is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what RudderStack is typically brought in for.
- What can Backendless do that RudderStack cannot?
- Backendless covers REST API, Real-time database, Cloud code, Custom integrations. RudderStack covers Data collection, Event tracking, Audience segmentation, Warehouse ingestion.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Backendless: Does Backendless have a free tier?
Backendless Free plan ($0/month) includes 50 API requests per minute, 20 database tables, 1 GB file storage, 1 visualization, 2 security roles, and basic cloud code capabilities.
SourceBackendless: What features does the Scale plan include?
Scale plan ($15+/month) provides unlimited API requests per month, 100 database tables, 10 GB file storage, 5 visualizations, 10 custom API keys, daily backups, free SSL certificates, and 1,000 real-time connections.
SourceBackendless: Can I add more storage or increase API limits?
Yes, Backendless offers Function Packs ranging from $5-$399/month to increase specific limits such as storage, API requests, or security features.
SourceBackendless: Does Backendless support offline functionality?
Backendless supports real-time sync and offline capabilities for mobile apps, allowing data to sync when connectivity is restored.
SourceBackendless: Is Backendless Pro available for self-hosting?
Yes, Backendless Pro Community Edition is available under free licensing for core functionality. Managed Backendless is a paid option for self-hosted deployments with request-based pricing.
SourceBackendless: What are Backendless's integration limitations?
While Backendless supports many integrations, it has a smaller integration library compared to competitors. Finding solutions to edge cases or complex setups may require more development effort.
SourceRelated pages
More on Backendless
More on RudderStack
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Backendless vs Appwrite
- Backendless vs Hasura
- Backendless vs PocketBase
- Backendless vs Sanity
- Backendless vs Apigee
- Backendless vs Bruno
- Backendless vs KeystoneJS
- Backendless vs Parse Server
- Backendless vs Stoplight
- Backendless vs Strapi
- Backendless vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Backendless vs Thunder Client
- Backendless vs WSO2 API Manager
- Backendless vs 3scale
- Backendless vs Akana
- Backendless vs Asyncapi
- Backendless vs AWS API Gateway
- Backendless vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Backendless vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Backendless vs n8n
- Backendless vs Zapier
- Backendless vs MuleSoft
- Backendless vs Parabola
- Backendless vs Zapier Plus
- Backendless vs Jitterbit
- Backendless vs mParticle
- Backendless vs Paragon
- Backendless vs Workato
- Backendless vs Airbyte
- Backendless vs Automate.io
- Backendless vs Boomi
- Backendless vs Browser Use
- Backendless vs Browserbase
- Backendless vs Celigo
- Backendless vs Census
- Backendless vs CrewAI
- RudderStack vs Appwrite
- RudderStack vs Hasura
- RudderStack vs PocketBase
- RudderStack vs Sanity
- RudderStack vs Apigee
- RudderStack vs Bruno
- RudderStack vs KeystoneJS
- RudderStack vs Parse Server
- RudderStack vs Stoplight
- RudderStack vs Strapi
- RudderStack vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- RudderStack vs Thunder Client
- RudderStack vs WSO2 API Manager
- RudderStack vs 3scale
- RudderStack vs Akana
- RudderStack vs Asyncapi
- RudderStack vs AWS API Gateway
- RudderStack vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- RudderStack vs Microsoft Power Automate
- RudderStack vs n8n
- RudderStack vs Zapier
- RudderStack vs MuleSoft
- RudderStack vs Parabola
- RudderStack vs Zapier Plus
- RudderStack vs Jitterbit
- RudderStack vs mParticle
- RudderStack vs Paragon
- RudderStack vs Workato
- RudderStack vs Airbyte
- RudderStack vs Automate.io
- RudderStack vs Boomi
- RudderStack vs Browser Use
- RudderStack vs Browserbase
- RudderStack vs Celigo
- RudderStack vs Census
- RudderStack vs CrewAI

