Software · head to head
Backendless vs GitHub Actions

Backendless
Software
Visual app development platform with REST APIs and cloud backend
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Backendless free tier limited to 50 API requests per minute and 20 database tables; GitHub Actions private repository usage is capped at 2,000 minutes per month on GitHub Free and 3,000 on Pro and Team, with anything beyond billed
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Backendless and GitHub Actions actually diverge.
| Attribute | Backendless | GitHub Actions |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Platforms | Cloud, Visual builder | Web |
| Founded | 2012 | 2008 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Backendless
- REST API
- Real-time database
- Cloud code
- Custom integrations
- Webhooks
- Cloud functions
- Cloud support
- Visual builder support
Only in GitHub Actions
Nothing recorded that Backendless does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Backendless
- API Developmentnot GitHub Actions
- API Gatewaynot GitHub Actions
- API Testingnot GitHub Actions
- API Documentationnot GitHub Actions
- Microservicesnot GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
- Running CI builds and tests on pushes and pull requestsnot Backendless
- Automating releases, container image builds and deployments from a repositorynot Backendless
- Scheduled maintenance jobs and repository automationnot Backendless
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Backendless
- Free tier limited to 50 API requests per minute and 20 database tables
- Smaller community and integration ecosystem compared to Firebase or AWS
- Customization beyond codeless tools requires developer expertise
- Limited documentation for advanced use cases and edge cases
GitHub Actions
- Private repository usage is capped at 2,000 minutes per month on GitHub Free and 3,000 on Pro and Team, with anything beyond billed
- Artifact storage is only 500 MB on GitHub Free and 2 GB on Team, and it is shared with GitHub Packages storage
- Larger runners are always charged for, even on public repositories and even when plan quota remains
- Windows runners cost $0.010 per minute against $0.006 for a 2-core Linux runner, so the same workflow costs more per platform
- macOS runners are charged at a higher per-minute rate than Linux runners
- Failed runs consume minutes, so a job that fails after 5 minutes and is re-run for 10 uses 15 minutes of quota
- Storage is billed on hourly accrual in GB-Hours, so deleting artifacts stops future charges but does not remove charges already accrued in the cycle
- Cache storage is a separate 10 GB per repository allowance and peak hourly usage above it is charged
- Minutes are charged to the repository owner, not the person who triggered the run, and anyone with write access can trigger runs
- Without a valid payment method on file, workflows are blocked as soon as the quota is exhausted
Pricing, plan by plan
Backendless
Free- FreeFree
- 50 API requests/minute
- 20 database tables
- 1 GB file storage
- Scale Variable$15/month
- Unlimited API requests/month
- 100 database tables
- 10 GB file storage
- Scale Fixed$15/month
- Same as Scale Variable
- Fixed monthly pricing
GitHub Actions
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the GitHub Actions review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Backendless if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Visual builder.
- You also want real-time database.
Questions people ask
- Is Backendless or GitHub Actions better?
- Neither clearly leads. Backendless starts at Free and GitHub Actions at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Backendless or GitHub Actions?
- Backendless starts at Free and GitHub Actions at Free.
- Does Backendless or GitHub Actions run on more platforms?
- Backendless runs on Cloud, Visual builder. GitHub Actions runs on Web.
- Can I use Backendless for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Backendless best used for?
- Backendless is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what GitHub Actions is typically brought in for.
- What can Backendless do that GitHub Actions cannot?
- Backendless covers REST API, Real-time database, Cloud code, Custom integrations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Backendless: Does Backendless have a free tier?
Backendless Free plan ($0/month) includes 50 API requests per minute, 20 database tables, 1 GB file storage, 1 visualization, 2 security roles, and basic cloud code capabilities.
SourceBackendless: What features does the Scale plan include?
Scale plan ($15+/month) provides unlimited API requests per month, 100 database tables, 10 GB file storage, 5 visualizations, 10 custom API keys, daily backups, free SSL certificates, and 1,000 real-time connections.
SourceBackendless: Can I add more storage or increase API limits?
Yes, Backendless offers Function Packs ranging from $5-$399/month to increase specific limits such as storage, API requests, or security features.
SourceBackendless: Does Backendless support offline functionality?
Backendless supports real-time sync and offline capabilities for mobile apps, allowing data to sync when connectivity is restored.
SourceBackendless: Is Backendless Pro available for self-hosting?
Yes, Backendless Pro Community Edition is available under free licensing for core functionality. Managed Backendless is a paid option for self-hosted deployments with request-based pricing.
SourceBackendless: What are Backendless's integration limitations?
While Backendless supports many integrations, it has a smaller integration library compared to competitors. Finding solutions to edge cases or complex setups may require more development effort.
SourceRelated pages
More on Backendless
More on GitHub Actions
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Backendless vs Appwrite
- Backendless vs Hasura
- Backendless vs PocketBase
- Backendless vs Sanity
- Backendless vs Apigee
- Backendless vs Bruno
- Backendless vs KeystoneJS
- Backendless vs Parse Server
- Backendless vs Stoplight
- Backendless vs Strapi
- Backendless vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Backendless vs Thunder Client
- Backendless vs WSO2 API Manager
- Backendless vs 3scale
- Backendless vs Akana
- Backendless vs Asyncapi
- Backendless vs AWS API Gateway
- Backendless vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Backendless vs Insomnia
- Backendless vs BrowserStack
- Backendless vs BugHerd
- Backendless vs CircleCI
- Backendless vs Cypress
- Backendless vs Playwright
- Backendless vs Zephyr Scale
- GitHub Actions vs Appwrite
- GitHub Actions vs Hasura
- GitHub Actions vs PocketBase
- GitHub Actions vs Sanity
- GitHub Actions vs Apigee
- GitHub Actions vs Bruno
- GitHub Actions vs KeystoneJS
- GitHub Actions vs Parse Server
- GitHub Actions vs Stoplight
- GitHub Actions vs Strapi
- GitHub Actions vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GitHub Actions vs Thunder Client
- GitHub Actions vs WSO2 API Manager
- GitHub Actions vs 3scale
- GitHub Actions vs Akana
- GitHub Actions vs Asyncapi
- GitHub Actions vs AWS API Gateway
- GitHub Actions vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- GitHub Actions vs Insomnia
- GitHub Actions vs BrowserStack
- GitHub Actions vs BugHerd
- GitHub Actions vs CircleCI
- GitHub Actions vs Cypress
- GitHub Actions vs Playwright
- GitHub Actions vs Zephyr Scale

