APIs · head to head
Backendless vs mabl

Backendless
APIs
Visual app development platform with REST APIs and cloud backend
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

mabl
Testing
Low-code browser and API test automation with hosted runners and self-healing selectors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Backendless has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Backendless free tier limited to 50 API requests per minute and 20 database tables; mabl tests are stored in a proprietary format and cannot be exported as runnable code, so migrating to Playwright or Cypress later means re authoring every test by hand.
- They diverge on capability: Backendless covers REST API, mabl covers Trainer recorder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Backendless and mabl actually diverge.
| Attribute | Backendless | mabl |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, Visual builder | Web, macOS, Windows, Linux |
| Category | APIs | Testing |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Backendless
- REST API
- Real-time database
- Cloud code
- Custom integrations
- Webhooks
- Cloud functions
- Cloud support
- Visual builder support
Only in mabl
- Trainer recorder
- Auto healing selectors
- API testing
- Accessibility checks
- Cross browser cloud runs
- CI and issue tracker hooks
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Backendless
- API Developmentnot mabl
- API Gatewaynot mabl
- API Testingnot mabl
- API Documentationnot mabl
- Microservicesnot mabl
mabl
- A QA team of two or three people responsible for regression coverage across a web application released weeklynot Backendless
- An organisation that abandoned a Selenium suite because maintenance consumed more time than manual testing didnot Backendless
- Teams that need accessibility scanning and functional regression reported in the same runnot Backendless
- Product companies where non engineers, such as support or business analysts, are expected to author testsnot Backendless
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Backendless
- Free tier limited to 50 API requests per minute and 20 database tables
- Smaller community and integration ecosystem compared to Firebase or AWS
- Customization beyond codeless tools requires developer expertise
- Limited documentation for advanced use cases and edge cases
mabl
- Tests are stored in a proprietary format and cannot be exported as runnable code, so migrating to Playwright or Cypress later means re authoring every test by hand.
- Auto healing can mask a genuine defect: if an element is removed and a similar one takes its place, the test adapts and passes when a user facing regression has actually shipped.
- Pricing is not published and is driven by concurrent run capacity, so the cost of shortening a two hour suite to twenty minutes is a renegotiation rather than a configuration change.
- Debugging a failure happens inside a hosted runner you do not control, which makes flakiness caused by test data or environment timing harder to reproduce locally than with a suite you run yourself.
- Native mobile application coverage is thin compared with the browser product, so teams with an iOS or Android app still need a second tool such as Appium or Maestro.
Pricing, plan by plan
Backendless
Free- FreeFree
- 50 API requests/minute
- 20 database tables
- 1 GB file storage
- Scale Variable$15/month
- Unlimited API requests/month
- 100 database tables
- 10 GB file storage
- Scale Fixed$15/month
- Same as Scale Variable
- Fixed monthly pricing
mabl
On request- mabl$undefined/year
- Annual subscription quoted per organisation, with the number of concurrent cloud runs as the main cost driver
- Trial available without a sales call, full pricing is not published
Which should you pick?
Choose Backendless if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Visual builder.
- You also want real-time database.
Choose mabl if
- You need trainer recorder.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- You also want auto healing selectors.
Questions people ask
- Is Backendless or mabl better?
- Neither clearly leads. Backendless starts at Free and mabl at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Backendless or mabl?
- Backendless has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Backendless and On request for mabl.
- Does Backendless or mabl run on more platforms?
- Backendless runs on Cloud, Visual builder. mabl runs on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use Backendless for free?
- Yes. Backendless has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. mabl starts at On request.
- What is Backendless best used for?
- Backendless is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what mabl is typically brought in for.
- What can Backendless do that mabl cannot?
- Backendless covers REST API, Real-time database, Cloud code, Custom integrations. mabl covers Trainer recorder, Auto healing selectors, API testing, Accessibility checks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Backendless: Does Backendless have a free tier?
Backendless Free plan ($0/month) includes 50 API requests per minute, 20 database tables, 1 GB file storage, 1 visualization, 2 security roles, and basic cloud code capabilities.
Sourcemabl: Can I export mabl tests to Playwright if we leave?
No. You can export documentation of the steps, but not runnable code. Budget for re authoring the suite.
Backendless: What features does the Scale plan include?
Scale plan ($15+/month) provides unlimited API requests per month, 100 database tables, 10 GB file storage, 5 visualizations, 10 custom API keys, daily backups, free SSL certificates, and 1,000 real-time connections.
Sourcemabl: Does auto healing actually work?
It works often enough to be the reason people buy it, but it cannot be verified from a demo. Trial it against your own application through at least two real releases.
Backendless: Can I add more storage or increase API limits?
Yes, Backendless offers Function Packs ranging from $5-$399/month to increase specific limits such as storage, API requests, or security features.
Sourcemabl: Is mabl a replacement for unit tests?
No. It covers end to end journeys through a running application. Unit and integration coverage still belongs in your repository.
Backendless: Does Backendless support offline functionality?
Backendless supports real-time sync and offline capabilities for mobile apps, allowing data to sync when connectivity is restored.
SourceBackendless: Is Backendless Pro available for self-hosting?
Yes, Backendless Pro Community Edition is available under free licensing for core functionality. Managed Backendless is a paid option for self-hosted deployments with request-based pricing.
SourceBackendless: What are Backendless's integration limitations?
While Backendless supports many integrations, it has a smaller integration library compared to competitors. Finding solutions to edge cases or complex setups may require more development effort.
SourceRelated pages
More on Backendless
Other head to heads
- Backendless vs PocketBase
- Backendless vs Appwrite
- Backendless vs Hasura
- Backendless vs Parse Server
- Backendless vs Thunder Client
- Backendless vs Janus Gateway
- Backendless vs Marqeta
- Backendless vs i2c
- Backendless vs Strapi
- Backendless vs Sanity
- Backendless vs Increase
- Backendless vs Flybits
- Backendless vs Sensedia
- Backendless vs Sila
- Backendless vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Backendless vs Swagger
- Backendless vs TIBCO Mashery
- Backendless vs Zeplo
- Backendless vs BrowserStack
- Backendless vs Playwright
- Backendless vs Cypress
- Backendless vs Testsigma
- Backendless vs QA Wolf
- Backendless vs Katalon
- Backendless vs Tricentis Tosca
- Backendless vs Robot Framework
- Backendless vs Ranorex
- Backendless vs WebdriverIO
- Backendless vs Detox
- Backendless vs CircleCI
- Backendless vs TestNG
- Backendless vs Applitools
- Backendless vs pytest
- Backendless vs Percy
- Backendless vs Jest
- mabl vs PocketBase
- mabl vs Appwrite
- mabl vs Hasura
- mabl vs Parse Server
- mabl vs Thunder Client
- mabl vs Janus Gateway
- mabl vs Marqeta
- mabl vs i2c
- mabl vs Strapi
- mabl vs Sanity
- mabl vs Increase
- mabl vs Flybits
- mabl vs Sensedia
- mabl vs Sila
- mabl vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- mabl vs Swagger
- mabl vs TIBCO Mashery
- mabl vs Zeplo
- mabl vs BrowserStack
- mabl vs Playwright
- mabl vs Cypress
- mabl vs Testsigma
- mabl vs QA Wolf
- mabl vs Katalon
- mabl vs Tricentis Tosca
- mabl vs Robot Framework
- mabl vs Ranorex
- mabl vs WebdriverIO
- mabl vs Detox
- mabl vs CircleCI
- mabl vs TestNG
- mabl vs Applitools
- mabl vs pytest
- mabl vs Percy
- mabl vs Jest
