Testing · alternatives
Alternatives to GitHub Actions
24 testing tools sit alongside GitHub Actions in this directory. Below is what separates each from GitHub Actions on the figures we hold, price, model, tier count and rating, and a direct comparison for every one.
- Alternatives listed
- 24
- With a free tier
- 14
- Cheaper to start
- -
- GitHub Actions starts at
- Free
Why people look past GitHub Actions
Nothing on the record flags a reason to move. GitHub Actions has a free tier. People still switch over fit and workflow, and those are not things a catalogue entry can measure, which is what the comparisons below are for.
What each alternative does differently
Ordered by the aggregated rating on each catalogue entry. Differences are drawn from price, pricing model, tier count and rating, the fields the category listing carries. For a feature-level difference, follow the head-to-head link on each card: those pages read both full records.
REST and GraphQL API client for development and testing
- Publishes an entry price of Free, where GitHub Actions does not.
- Sold on a freemium model rather than subscription.
Real device cloud for web and mobile testing
- No free tier, where GitHub Actions has one.
- Publishes an entry price of $12.5/month, where GitHub Actions does not.
- 10 tiers to GitHub Actions's 3.
Visual feedback and bug tracking for websites
- Publishes an entry price of $50/month, where GitHub Actions does not.
- 4 tiers to GitHub Actions's 3.
The leading CI/CD platform
- Publishes an entry price of $15/month, where GitHub Actions does not.
Open source mobile automation framework hosted under the OpenJS Foundation with copyright assigned to the foundation
- Sold on a Open source, no licence fee model rather than subscription.
- 1 tier to GitHub Actions's 3.
Open source end-to-end testing framework for React Native apps, built and maintained by Wix
- Sold on a Open source, no licence fee model rather than subscription.
- 1 tier to GitHub Actions's 3.
Every GitHub Actions alternative at a glance
A dash means the catalogue entry carries no figure, not that the answer is nothing.
| Tool | Entry price | Model | Tiers | Head to head |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub Actions (this page) | Free | Subscription | 3 | |
| InsomniaREST and GraphQL API client for development and testing | Free | Freemium | 3 | vs GitHub Actions |
| BrowserStackReal device cloud for web and mobile testing | $12.5/month | Subscription | 10 | vs GitHub Actions |
| BugHerdVisual feedback and bug tracking for websites | Free, then $50/month | Subscription | 4 | vs GitHub Actions |
| CircleCIThe leading CI/CD platform | Free, then $15/month | Subscription | 3 | vs GitHub Actions |
| Appium | Free | Open source, no licence fee | 1 | vs GitHub Actions |
| Detox | Free | Open source, no licence fee | 1 | vs GitHub Actions |
| JUnit | Free | Open source, no licence fee | 1 | vs GitHub Actions |
| WebdriverIO | Free | Open source, no licence fee | 1 | vs GitHub Actions |
| Jest | Free | Open source, no licence fee | 1 | vs GitHub Actions |
| Cucumber | Free | Open source, no licence fee | 1 | vs GitHub Actions |
| TestNG | Free | Open source, no licence fee | 1 | vs GitHub Actions |
| pytest | Free | Open source, no licence fee | 1 | vs GitHub Actions |
| Percy | Free | Freemium, paid tiers by screenshot volume | 2 | vs GitHub Actions |
| GrowthBook | Free, then $40/month | Per user per month | 4 | vs GitHub Actions |
| Qase | Free | Per user per month | 2 | vs GitHub Actions |
| PractiTest | On request | Per user per month, yearly minimum on Corporate tier | 2 | vs GitHub Actions |
| Ranorex | On request | Quote | 1 | vs GitHub Actions |
| Xray Test Management | On request | Per Jira user per month, tiered to total instance size | 3 | vs GitHub Actions |
| Katalon | On request | Per seat per month, plus separate per-session cloud execution charges | 3 | vs GitHub Actions |
| Sauce Labs | On request | Per month by parallel session count and device category | 4 | vs GitHub Actions |
| Applitools | On request | Per month by checkpoint volume | 3 | vs GitHub Actions |
| Kameleoon | On request | Quote | 1 | vs GitHub Actions |
| Split | On request | Quote | 3 | vs GitHub Actions |
| mabl | On request | Quote | 1 | vs GitHub Actions |
Ratings are aggregated from third-party sources and imported with each catalogue entry; Softwr hosts no reviews of these products. How each figure is used is set out on the GitHub Actions badges page.
Cheaper ways to solve the same problem
What you would be giving up
GitHub Actions is most often brought in for running ci builds and tests on pushes and pull requests, automating releases, container image builds and deployments from a repository, scheduled maintenance jobs and repository automation. Anything replacing it has to cover the ones you actually depend on, and a cheaper tool that misses one of them is not cheaper.
Two things this page cannot settle. It compares on price, model, tier count and rating, because those are the fields the category listing carries, feature-level differences need both full records, which is what the head-to-head pages load. And the ratings are third-party aggregates imported with each entry rather than reviews written here, so a 0.2 difference between two tools is noise rather than a finding.
If GitHub Actions is broadly right and the question is cost, the GitHub Actions pricing breakdown covers every tier and what each one adds. If you want the whole field rather than a shortlist, the Testing category lists everything the directory holds, and best testing tools ranks them.
GitHub Actions runs on not recorded. Platform coverage is not carried on the category listing for the alternatives, so it is one more thing to check on each head-to-head page rather than here.
Questions about GitHub Actions alternatives
- What are the main alternatives to GitHub Actions?
- 24 other testing tools are listed in this directory, led by Insomnia, BrowserStack, BugHerd, CircleCI. They are ordered by the aggregated rating on each catalogue entry, not by any Softwr ranking.
- What is the best free alternative to GitHub Actions?
- 14 of the alternatives listed here can be used without paying: Insomnia, BugHerd, CircleCI, Appium, Detox.
- Is there a reason to switch away from GitHub Actions?
- Nothing in the data flags one. GitHub Actions has a free tier. Fit and workflow are the usual reasons to move, and those are not things this record can measure.
- What would I give up by switching from GitHub Actions?
- GitHub Actions is most often brought in for running ci builds and tests on pushes and pull requests, automating releases, container image builds and deployments from a repository, scheduled maintenance jobs and repository automation. Anything you replace it with has to cover the ones you actually rely on, the side-by-side comparisons linked from each alternative below put the two feature records against each other.
- Is there an open-source alternative to GitHub Actions?
- None of the testing tools listed here are recorded as open source. That is what the licence field on each entry says, and the field is not always filled in, so it is worth checking directly for any tool you are serious about.
- How were these GitHub Actions alternatives chosen?
- They are the tools filed in the same category, Testing, ordered by the aggregated rating on each entry. There is no editorial shortlist, and nothing on this page is paid: no sponsored placement runs on alternatives pages and the order cannot be bought. Softwr has not used these products.
- Where can I compare GitHub Actions against one of these directly?
- Every alternative below has a side-by-side page against GitHub Actions covering price, platforms, features and what each one is used for. Those pages read the full record for both products rather than the summary shown here.
- Does this list cover every testing tool?
- No. It covers what this directory holds in the Testing category, 24 tools beside GitHub Actions. The category page lists the rest of the catalogue as it grows.