File Storage · head to head
Backblaze vs Wasabi

Backblaze
File Storage
Unlimited cloud backup at an affordable price
- From
- $9/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Backblaze personal Backup is $99 a year billed annually, with no monthly option; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: Backblaze covers Unlimited backup, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Backblaze and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (Unknown), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Backblaze
- Unlimited backup
- Continuous backup
- Version history
- Private encryption key
- Restore by mail
- Mobile apps
- macOS
- Windows
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Backblaze
- Unlimited backup of a personal computer and external drivesnot Wasabi
- Restoring files from anywhere through the webnot Wasabi
- Mailed hard drive restore for large recoveriesnot Wasabi
- Private encryption key control for sensitive datanot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Backblaze
- Media storagenot Backblaze
- Archive replacementnot Backblaze
- Ransomware protectionnot Backblaze
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Backblaze
- Personal Backup is $99 a year billed annually, with no monthly option
- Web restores are capped at 500GB per request
- Forever version history is a Business tier add-on rather than included
- Administrative controls and SSO are Business features
- Backs up user data from a computer and attached drives, so NAS and server backup are not covered by the personal plan
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Backblaze
$9/month- Personal Backup$9/month
- Unlimited storage for single computer
- Unlimited version history
- 30-day trial
- B2 Cloud Storage$6/TB/month
- S3-compatible storage
- Pay-as-you-go model
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Backblaze if
- You need unlimited backup.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web.
- You also want continuous backup.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Backblaze or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Backblaze starts at $9/month and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Backblaze or Wasabi?
- Backblaze starts at $9/month and Wasabi at $7.99/month.
- Does Backblaze or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Backblaze runs on Windows, macOS, Web. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- What is Backblaze best used for?
- Backblaze is most often used for unlimited backup of a personal computer and external drives, restoring files from anywhere through the web, mailed hard drive restore for large recoveries, private encryption key control for sensitive data. Of those, unlimited backup of a personal computer and external drives and restoring files from anywhere through the web are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Backblaze do that Wasabi cannot?
- Backblaze covers Unlimited backup, Continuous backup, Version history, Private encryption key. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Backblaze: What is the pricing for Backblaze Personal Backup?
Backblaze Personal Backup costs $9/month on monthly billing or $8.25/month when billed annually, providing unlimited storage for a single computer.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceBackblaze: What storage options does Backblaze B2 offer?
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage is priced at $6/TB per month with a pay-as-you-go model, and is S3 compatible for flexible cloud storage.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceBackblaze: Does Backblaze support Linux systems?
No. Backblaze does not support Linux operating systems, limiting it to Windows, macOS, and web access only.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Backblaze vs Carbonite
- Backblaze vs IDrive
- Backblaze vs Arq Backup
- Backblaze vs CrashPlan
- Backblaze vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Backblaze vs Sync.com
- Backblaze vs Barracuda Backup
- Backblaze vs Ceph
- Backblaze vs MinIO
- Backblaze vs Cloudflare R2
- Backblaze vs TrueNAS
- Backblaze vs Box
- Backblaze vs LucidLink
- Backblaze vs Panzura
- Backblaze vs pCloud
- Backblaze vs Scality RING
- Backblaze vs Storj
- Backblaze vs IDrive e2
- Backblaze vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Backblaze vs DigitalOcean
- Backblaze vs Hetzner Cloud
- Backblaze vs Scaleway
- Backblaze vs Linode
- Backblaze vs Vultr
- Backblaze vs Zeabur
- Backblaze vs Porter
- Backblaze vs Contabo
- Backblaze vs Encore
- Backblaze vs Google Cloud Platform
- Backblaze vs Microsoft Azure
- Backblaze vs HAProxy
- Backblaze vs IBM Cloud
- Backblaze vs kind
- Backblaze vs Koyeb
- Backblaze vs Kustomize
- Backblaze vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Carbonite
- Wasabi vs IDrive
- Wasabi vs Arq Backup
- Wasabi vs CrashPlan
- Wasabi vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Wasabi vs Sync.com
- Wasabi vs Barracuda Backup
- Wasabi vs Ceph
- Wasabi vs MinIO
- Wasabi vs Cloudflare R2
- Wasabi vs TrueNAS
- Wasabi vs Box
- Wasabi vs LucidLink
- Wasabi vs Panzura
- Wasabi vs pCloud
- Wasabi vs Scality RING
- Wasabi vs Storj
- Wasabi vs IDrive e2
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd

