Software · head to head
Box vs Wasabi
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Box all Business and Enterprise plans require a minimum of 3 users; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Box and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Box
Nothing recorded that Wasabi does not also cover.
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Box
No use cases recorded yet. See the Box review.
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Box
- Media storagenot Box
- Archive replacementnot Box
- Ransomware protectionnot Box
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Box
- All Business and Enterprise plans require a minimum of 3 users
- Business Starter ($5/user/month) caps at 100 GB of shared storage across the whole account and a 2 GB per file upload limit
- Enterprise Plus requires annual billing, and Enterprise Advanced's exact price is not published on the pricing page
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Box
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Box review.
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Box if
Nothing in the data separates Box from Wasabi on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Box or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Box starts at On request and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Box or Wasabi?
- Box starts at On request and Wasabi at $7.99/month.
- Does Box or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Box runs on Web. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- What can Box do that Wasabi cannot?
- Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Wasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Box vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Box vs Carbonite
- Box vs Backblaze
- Box vs Barracuda Backup
- Box vs Arq Backup
- Box vs CrashPlan
- Box vs Duplicati
- Box vs Zerto
- Box vs IDrive
- Box vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Box vs Nextcloud
- Box vs pCloud
- Box vs Sync.com
- Box vs Tresorit
- Box vs TrueNAS
- Box vs Veritas NetBackup
- Box vs Grafana Cloud
- Box vs Neon
- Box vs DigitalOcean
- Box vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Box vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Box vs Deno Deploy
- Box vs Heroku
- Box vs Hetzner Cloud
- Box vs Linode
- Box vs Packer
- Box vs Pulumi
- Box vs Render
- Box vs Upstash
- Box vs Vagrant
- Box vs Vultr
- Box vs Akamai
- Box vs Alibaba Cloud
- Box vs Chef
- Wasabi vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Wasabi vs Carbonite
- Wasabi vs Backblaze
- Wasabi vs Barracuda Backup
- Wasabi vs Arq Backup
- Wasabi vs CrashPlan
- Wasabi vs Duplicati
- Wasabi vs Zerto
- Wasabi vs IDrive
- Wasabi vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Wasabi vs Nextcloud
- Wasabi vs pCloud
- Wasabi vs Sync.com
- Wasabi vs Tresorit
- Wasabi vs TrueNAS
- Wasabi vs Veritas NetBackup
- Wasabi vs Grafana Cloud
- Wasabi vs Neon
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Wasabi vs Deno Deploy
- Wasabi vs Heroku
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Packer
- Wasabi vs Pulumi
- Wasabi vs Render
- Wasabi vs Upstash
- Wasabi vs Vagrant
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Akamai
- Wasabi vs Alibaba Cloud
- Wasabi vs Chef


