Logging · head to head
Azure Monitor vs Galileo

Galileo
AI
Evaluation and observability platform for GenAI applications and agents
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Azure Monitor billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does; Galileo the free plan is limited to 5,000 traces per month, which is quickly outgrown by production workloads.
- They diverge on capability: Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Galileo covers Pre-built evaluations.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Monitor and Galileo actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Monitor | Galileo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Category | Logging | AI |
| Founded | 2010 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Monitor
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
- Custom dashboards
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
Only in Galileo
- Pre-built evaluations
- Ground truth capture
- Luna models
- Agent behavior analysis
- Production guardrails
- Flexible deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Monitor
- Collecting logs and metrics from Azure resourcesnot Galileo
- Alerting on metric thresholds and log queriesnot Galileo
- Application performance monitoring through Application Insightsnot Galileo
- Long-term log retention for compliancenot Galileo
- Querying operational data with KQLnot Galileo
Galileo
- Evaluating RAG and agent applications before production releasenot Azure Monitor
- Monitoring live GenAI applications for failures and driftnot Azure Monitor
- Applying real-time guardrails without custom integration worknot Azure Monitor
- Reducing evaluation costs using distilled Luna judge modelsnot Azure Monitor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Monitor
- Billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does
- Only the first 5 GB a month of Analytics logs is free per billing account
- Retention beyond the base period is charged per GB per month, up to 2 years interactive and 12 years long term
- Log queries and search jobs are billed per GB scanned, so investigating an incident costs money
- Alert rules are billed per time series for metrics and by execution frequency for logs
- The pricing page shows placeholders rather than rates until a region and currency are chosen
Galileo
- The free plan is limited to 5,000 traces per month, which is quickly outgrown by production workloads.
- Real-time guardrails and unlimited trace capacity are reserved for the custom-priced Enterprise tier.
- Pro plan pricing scales with trace volume, so costs can grow unpredictably as usage increases.
- On-premises deployment requires an Enterprise contract rather than being available self-serve.
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Monitor
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
Galileo
Free- FreeFree
- 5,000 traces/month
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited custom evaluations
- Pro$100/month
- 50,000 traces/month
- Standard role-based access control
- Advanced analytics and insights
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Unlimited trace capacity
- Custom rate limits
- Hosted, VPC, or on-prem deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose Azure Monitor if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want metrics collection.
Choose Galileo if
- You need pre-built evaluations.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want ground truth capture.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Monitor or Galileo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Monitor starts at Free and Galileo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Monitor or Galileo?
- Azure Monitor starts at Free and Galileo at Free.
- Does Azure Monitor or Galileo run on more platforms?
- Azure Monitor runs on Web, Api. Galileo runs on web, api.
- Can I use Azure Monitor for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Azure Monitor best used for?
- Azure Monitor is most often used for collecting logs and metrics from azure resources, alerting on metric thresholds and log queries, application performance monitoring through application insights, long-term log retention for compliance. Of those, collecting logs and metrics from azure resources and alerting on metric thresholds and log queries are not what Galileo is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Monitor do that Galileo cannot?
- Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Metrics collection, Alerts and notifications, Custom dashboards. Galileo covers Pre-built evaluations, Ground truth capture, Luna models, Agent behavior analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Azure Monitor: How does Azure Monitor billing work?
Billing is based on data volume ingested into Azure Monitor. Additional charges apply separately for alerts, notifications, web tests, and data export. Activity log and platform metrics are automatically collected with an Azure subscription.
SourceGalileo: What does Galileo cost?
Galileo offers a free plan, a Pro plan at $100/month billed yearly (with a 33% annual discount), and a custom-priced Enterprise plan for unlimited trace capacity.
SourceAzure Monitor: What savings are available with Azure Monitor?
Capacity reservations offer up to 36% savings compared to standard pay-as-you-go pricing when you commit to reserved capacity upfront.
SourceGalileo: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
The Free plan includes 5,000 traces per month with unlimited users and unlimited custom evaluations, aimed at developers and small teams experimenting with GenAI.
SourceAzure Monitor: Is there a free tier for Azure Monitor?
No dedicated free tier exists. Activity log and platform metrics are automatically collected with an Azure subscription, but detailed monitoring requires additional configuration and associated costs.
SourceGalileo: How is usage metered?
Galileo's pricing scales based on the number of traces processed each month, with Free capped at 5,000, Pro at 50,000, and Enterprise offering unlimited trace capacity.
SourceRelated pages
More on Azure Monitor
Other head to heads
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic Stack
- Azure Monitor vs New Relic
- Azure Monitor vs Datadog Logs
- Azure Monitor vs Coralogix
- Azure Monitor vs Grafana Loki
- Azure Monitor vs incident.io
- Azure Monitor vs Cronitor
- Azure Monitor vs FireHydrant
- Azure Monitor vs Healthchecks
- Azure Monitor vs Openstatus
- Azure Monitor vs Rootly
- Azure Monitor vs Checkly
- Azure Monitor vs CloudWatch
- Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace
- Azure Monitor vs InfluxDB
- Azure Monitor vs Airbrake
- Azure Monitor vs AppDynamics
- Azure Monitor vs Axiom
- Azure Monitor vs Pika
- Azure Monitor vs Anthropic API
- Azure Monitor vs D-ID
- Azure Monitor vs Fathom
- Azure Monitor vs Together AI
- Azure Monitor vs Stable Diffusion
- Azure Monitor vs Arize AI
- Azure Monitor vs ChatGPT
- Azure Monitor vs Perplexity
- Azure Monitor vs AutoGen
- Azure Monitor vs Black Forest Labs
- Azure Monitor vs Cartesia
- Azure Monitor vs Deepgram
- Azure Monitor vs Helicone
- Azure Monitor vs Ideogram
- Azure Monitor vs Jasper
- Azure Monitor vs LangGraph
- Azure Monitor vs Lindy
- Galileo vs Elastic Stack
- Galileo vs New Relic
- Galileo vs Datadog Logs
- Galileo vs Coralogix
- Galileo vs Grafana Loki
- Galileo vs incident.io
- Galileo vs Cronitor
- Galileo vs FireHydrant
- Galileo vs Healthchecks
- Galileo vs Openstatus
- Galileo vs Rootly
- Galileo vs Checkly
- Galileo vs CloudWatch
- Galileo vs Dynatrace
- Galileo vs InfluxDB
- Galileo vs Airbrake
- Galileo vs AppDynamics
- Galileo vs Axiom
- Galileo vs Pika
- Galileo vs Anthropic API
- Galileo vs D-ID
- Galileo vs Fathom
- Galileo vs Together AI
- Galileo vs Stable Diffusion
- Galileo vs Arize AI
- Galileo vs ChatGPT
- Galileo vs Perplexity
- Galileo vs AutoGen
- Galileo vs Black Forest Labs
- Galileo vs Cartesia
- Galileo vs Deepgram
- Galileo vs Helicone
- Galileo vs Ideogram
- Galileo vs Jasper
- Galileo vs LangGraph
- Galileo vs Lindy

