Government · head to head
Azure Government vs Diligent

Diligent
Cybersecurity
Board management and enterprise GRC platform assembled from Galvanize, Steele and Diligent Boards
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Azure Government restricted to US government entities, their solution providers and contractors handling government data, with Microsoft validating eligibility first; Diligent the platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.
- They diverge on capability: Azure Government covers FedRAMP High Authorized, Diligent covers Diligent Boards.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Government and Diligent actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Government | Diligent |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Cli, Sdk | Web, iOS, Android, Windows |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 1975 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Government
- FedRAMP High Authorized
- DOD IL5 Approved
- Isolated Datacenters
- Hybrid Cloud
- AI & ML Services
- Microsoft 365
- Dynamics 365
- Power Platform
Only in Diligent
- Diligent Boards
- Entity management
- Audit and analytics
- Risk management
- Third-party risk
- Ethics and compliance
- ESG and sustainability
- Market intelligence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Government
- Hosting US government workloads in dedicated domestic datacentresnot Diligent
- Systems needing FedRAMP High, DoD IL2 to IL5, CJIS or ITAR authorisationnot Diligent
- State, local and tribal government cloud servicesnot Diligent
- Contractors processing controlled government datanot Diligent
Diligent
- A listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance systemnot Azure Government
- An internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the ACL heritage analytics enginenot Azure Government
- A regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement findingnot Azure Government
- A group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reportingnot Azure Government
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Government
- Restricted to US government entities, their solution providers and contractors handling government data, with Microsoft validating eligibility first
- A narrower service catalogue than commercial Azure
- New features arrive later than in the commercial regions
- Pricing is not published and runs through federal contract vehicles such as JWCC, GSA and NASA SEWP
Diligent
- The platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.
- Pricing is unpublished and consistently at the top of the market, and organisations that need only one capability, a board portal or an audit analytics tool, generally pay less and get more from a specialist.
- Renewal leverage is weak once the board portal is embedded, because directors are the least willing user group to be migrated and that dependency is well understood by the vendor at renewal time.
- The analytics engine expects real data skills, and audit teams without an analytics-capable member typically use a fraction of what they licensed while paying for all of it.
- Module-by-module implementation means the promised single view of governance and risk usually arrives years after the first purchase, if the later modules are ever funded.
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Government
On request- Pay-as-you-goFree
- Virtual Machines
- Azure SQL
- Storage
Diligent
On request- Diligent One Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted by module and user count
- Board portal seats priced separately from GRC modules
- Annual subscription, commonly multi-year
Which should you pick?
Choose Azure Government if
- You need fedramp high authorized.
- You work on Web, Cli, Sdk.
- You also want dod il5 approved.
Choose Diligent if
- You need diligent boards.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want entity management.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Government or Diligent better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Government starts at On request and Diligent at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Government or Diligent?
- Azure Government starts at On request and Diligent at On request.
- Does Azure Government or Diligent run on more platforms?
- Azure Government runs on Web, Cli, Sdk. Diligent runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- What is Azure Government best used for?
- Azure Government is most often used for hosting us government workloads in dedicated domestic datacentres, systems needing fedramp high, dod il2 to il5, cjis or itar authorisation, state, local and tribal government cloud services, contractors processing controlled government data. Of those, hosting us government workloads in dedicated domestic datacentres and systems needing fedramp high, dod il2 to il5, cjis or itar authorisation are not what Diligent is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Government do that Diligent cannot?
- Azure Government covers FedRAMP High Authorized, DOD IL5 Approved, Isolated Datacenters, Hybrid Cloud. Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Entity management, Audit and analytics, Risk management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Azure Government: How is Azure Government pricing determined?
Azure pricing follows a pay-as-you-go model where you only pay for services you use. Prices vary by product, region, and usage patterns. Committed use discounts and reserved instances can save up to 65% for compute services.
SourceDiligent: Is Diligent One the same product as Galvanize?
It contains it. Diligent bought Galvanize, the ACL and Rsam merger, for around one billion dollars in April 2021, and its audit analytics and risk modules are that heritage rebranded into Diligent One.
Diligent: What does Diligent cost?
Not published. It is quoted by module and user, and board portal seats are priced differently from GRC seats. Expect an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement.
Diligent: Can you buy just the board portal?
Yes, Diligent Boards is sold on its own and is the most common entry point. The GRC modules are separate purchases.
Diligent: Does it replace a SOC 2 automation tool?
No. Diligent is aimed at enterprise audit, risk and governance, not at automated evidence collection for security certifications.
Related pages
More on Azure Government
Other head to heads
- Azure Government vs Accela
- Azure Government vs CivicPlus
- Azure Government vs Granicus
- Azure Government vs DocuWare
- Azure Government vs Google Cloud for Government
- Azure Government vs AWS GovCloud
- Azure Government vs Oracle Government Cloud
- Azure Government vs Workday Government
- Azure Government vs OpenGov
- Azure Government vs Tyler Technologies
- Azure Government vs CentralSquare
- Azure Government vs CKAN
- Azure Government vs Clariti
- Azure Government vs DataSF
- Azure Government vs GovPilot
- Azure Government vs GovQA
- Azure Government vs Incode
- Azure Government vs LogicManager
- Azure Government vs Resolver
- Azure Government vs MetricStream
- Azure Government vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Azure Government vs Transcend
- Azure Government vs OneTrust
- Azure Government vs Milestone XProtect
- Azure Government vs Camio
- Azure Government vs Delinea
- Azure Government vs Dahua Technology
- Azure Government vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Azure Government vs IBM QRadar
- Azure Government vs Trivy
- Azure Government vs Trulioo
- Azure Government vs Unit21
- Azure Government vs Veracode
- Azure Government vs Very Good Security
- Azure Government vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Diligent vs Accela
- Diligent vs CivicPlus
- Diligent vs Granicus
- Diligent vs DocuWare
- Diligent vs Google Cloud for Government
- Diligent vs AWS GovCloud
- Diligent vs Oracle Government Cloud
- Diligent vs Workday Government
- Diligent vs OpenGov
- Diligent vs Tyler Technologies
- Diligent vs CentralSquare
- Diligent vs CKAN
- Diligent vs Clariti
- Diligent vs DataSF
- Diligent vs GovPilot
- Diligent vs GovQA
- Diligent vs Incode
- Diligent vs LogicManager
- Diligent vs Resolver
- Diligent vs MetricStream
- Diligent vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Diligent vs Transcend
- Diligent vs OneTrust
- Diligent vs Milestone XProtect
- Diligent vs Camio
- Diligent vs Delinea
- Diligent vs Dahua Technology
- Diligent vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Diligent vs IBM QRadar
- Diligent vs Trivy
- Diligent vs Trulioo
- Diligent vs Unit21
- Diligent vs Veracode
- Diligent vs Very Good Security
- Diligent vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station

