Cloud · head to head
Azure Functions vs Wasabi
The short version
- Only Azure Functions has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Azure Functions consumption plan free grant is capped at 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-seconds of resource consumption per month per subscription, billed per GB-second beyond that; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Functions and Wasabi actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Functions | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $7.99/month |
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, API |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Functions
Nothing recorded that Wasabi does not also cover.
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Functions
- Event-driven computingnot Wasabi
- Serverless application backendnot Wasabi
- Scalable API endpointsnot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Azure Functions
- Media storagenot Azure Functions
- Archive replacementnot Azure Functions
- Ransomware protectionnot Azure Functions
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Functions
- Consumption plan free grant is capped at 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-seconds of resource consumption per month per subscription, billed per GB-second beyond that
- The newer Flex Consumption plan's free grant is smaller still, at 250,000 executions and 100,000 GB-seconds per month
- Premium plan avoids per-execution charges but bills continuously for allocated core seconds and memory regardless of invocation volume
- Memory is rounded up to the nearest 128 MB and execution time to the nearest 1 ms for billing, so small overages round upward
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Functions
Free- Consumption Plan$null/month
- 1 million requests free monthly
- 400,000 GB-seconds free monthly
- Billed per second and executions
- Flex Consumption Plan$null/month
- 250,000 executions free monthly
- 100,000 GB-seconds free monthly
- Event-driven scaling
- Premium Plan$null/month
- No execution charges
- At least one instance required
- Includes automatic scaling and VNET access
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Functions or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Functions starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Functions or Wasabi?
- Azure Functions has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Azure Functions and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does Azure Functions or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Azure Functions runs on Web. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Azure Functions for free?
- Yes. Azure Functions has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What is Azure Functions best used for?
- Azure Functions is most often used for event-driven computing, serverless application backend, scalable api endpoints. Of those, event-driven computing and serverless application backend are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Functions do that Wasabi cannot?
- Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Azure Functions: Does Azure Functions have a free tier?
Yes, Azure Functions includes a monthly free grant of 1 million requests and 400,000 GB-seconds on the Consumption Plan, or 250,000 executions and 100,000 GB-seconds on Flex Consumption.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceAzure Functions: What is Azure Functions' pricing model?
Azure Functions uses usage-based pricing. Consumption plans charge per second of resource consumption and per execution, measured in gigabyte-seconds and rounded to the nearest 128 MB.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceAzure Functions: What is the minimum execution time for Azure Functions?
The minimum execution time is 100 milliseconds on Consumption plans. Premium plans charge based on core seconds and allocated memory.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
More on Azure Functions
Other head to heads
- Azure Functions vs Go
- Azure Functions vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Azure Functions vs Porter
- Azure Functions vs Beam Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Upstash
- Azure Functions vs Oracle Cloud
- Azure Functions vs SST
- Azure Functions vs Tencent Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Terragrunt
- Azure Functions vs Neon
- Azure Functions vs Pulumi
- Azure Functions vs Lambda
- Azure Functions vs Linode
- Azure Functions vs Longhorn
- Azure Functions vs Northflank
- Azure Functions vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Azure Functions vs minikube
- Azure Functions vs OpenTelemetry
- Azure Functions vs DigitalOcean
- Azure Functions vs Hetzner Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Scaleway
- Azure Functions vs Vultr
- Azure Functions vs Zeabur
- Azure Functions vs Contabo
- Azure Functions vs Encore
- Azure Functions vs Google Cloud Platform
- Azure Functions vs Microsoft Azure
- Azure Functions vs HAProxy
- Azure Functions vs IBM Cloud
- Azure Functions vs kind
- Azure Functions vs Koyeb
- Azure Functions vs Kustomize
- Azure Functions vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Go
- Wasabi vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Beam Cloud
- Wasabi vs Upstash
- Wasabi vs Oracle Cloud
- Wasabi vs SST
- Wasabi vs Tencent Cloud
- Wasabi vs Terragrunt
- Wasabi vs Neon
- Wasabi vs Pulumi
- Wasabi vs Lambda
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Longhorn
- Wasabi vs Northflank
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs minikube
- Wasabi vs OpenTelemetry
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd


