Cloud · head to head
Azure Functions vs Zeabur
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Azure Functions consumption plan free grant is capped at 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-seconds of resource consumption per month per subscription, billed per GB-second beyond that; Zeabur free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Functions and Zeabur actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Functions | Zeabur |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Fixed monthly plans |
| Platforms | Web | Web, CLI |
| Founded | Unknown | 2025 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Functions
Nothing recorded that Zeabur does not also cover.
Only in Zeabur
- AI Agent
- Managed Servers
- Domain and DNS Management
- Email Service
- AI Hub
- Deploy Templates
- Git Integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Functions
- Event-driven computingnot Zeabur
- Serverless application backendnot Zeabur
- Scalable API endpointsnot Zeabur
Zeabur
- Deploying full-stack web applications without DevOps expertisenot Azure Functions
- Building AI agent infrastructure with integrated API accessnot Azure Functions
- Managing multi-region deployments with automated scalingnot Azure Functions
- Running containerized services with built-in domain and emailnot Azure Functions
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Functions
- Consumption plan free grant is capped at 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-seconds of resource consumption per month per subscription, billed per GB-second beyond that
- The newer Flex Consumption plan's free grant is smaller still, at 250,000 executions and 100,000 GB-seconds per month
- Premium plan avoids per-execution charges but bills continuously for allocated core seconds and memory regardless of invocation volume
- Memory is rounded up to the nearest 128 MB and execution time to the nearest 1 ms for billing, so small overages round upward
Zeabur
- Free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Small team size may limit support and feature velocity
- Building spec upgrades limited on lower tiers
- Enterprise support not clearly documented
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Functions
Free- Consumption Plan$null/month
- 1 million requests free monthly
- 400,000 GB-seconds free monthly
- Billed per second and executions
- Flex Consumption Plan$null/month
- 250,000 executions free monthly
- 100,000 GB-seconds free monthly
- Event-driven scaling
- Premium Plan$null/month
- No execution charges
- At least one instance required
- Includes automatic scaling and VNET access
Zeabur
Free- FreeFree
- 1 manageable server
- 2C4G build specs
- 48-hour log retention
- Dev$5/month
- 3 manageable servers
- 7-day log retention
- 250 MB file uploads
- Pro$19/month
- 10 manageable servers
- 4C8G build specs
- 30-day log retention
- Team$79/month
- 3 included seats
- Unlimited manageable servers
- 90-day log retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Zeabur if
- You need ai agent.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want managed servers.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Functions or Zeabur better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Functions starts at Free and Zeabur at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Functions or Zeabur?
- Azure Functions starts at Free and Zeabur at Free.
- Does Azure Functions or Zeabur run on more platforms?
- Azure Functions runs on Web. Zeabur runs on Web, CLI.
- Can I use Azure Functions for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Azure Functions best used for?
- Azure Functions is most often used for event-driven computing, serverless application backend, scalable api endpoints. Of those, event-driven computing and serverless application backend are not what Zeabur is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Functions do that Zeabur cannot?
- Zeabur covers AI Agent, Managed Servers, Domain and DNS Management, Email Service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Azure Functions: Does Azure Functions have a free tier?
Yes, Azure Functions includes a monthly free grant of 1 million requests and 400,000 GB-seconds on the Consumption Plan, or 250,000 executions and 100,000 GB-seconds on Flex Consumption.
SourceZeabur: What is included in the free plan?
The free plan includes 1 manageable server, 2C4G build specifications, 48-hour log retention, 50 MB file upload limit, and community support.
SourceAzure Functions: What is Azure Functions' pricing model?
Azure Functions uses usage-based pricing. Consumption plans charge per second of resource consumption and per execution, measured in gigabyte-seconds and rounded to the nearest 128 MB.
SourceZeabur: How do additional seats work on the Team plan?
The Team plan includes 3 seats with additional seats available at $24 per seat per month.
SourceAzure Functions: What is the minimum execution time for Azure Functions?
The minimum execution time is 100 milliseconds on Consumption plans. Premium plans charge based on core seconds and allocated memory.
SourceZeabur: Is there a free trial period?
The Dev and Pro plans include 14 days free before billing begins.
SourceRelated pages
More on Azure Functions
Other head to heads
- Azure Functions vs Go
- Azure Functions vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Azure Functions vs Porter
- Azure Functions vs Beam Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Upstash
- Azure Functions vs Oracle Cloud
- Azure Functions vs SST
- Azure Functions vs Tencent Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Terragrunt
- Azure Functions vs Neon
- Azure Functions vs Pulumi
- Azure Functions vs Lambda
- Azure Functions vs Linode
- Azure Functions vs Longhorn
- Azure Functions vs Northflank
- Azure Functions vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Azure Functions vs minikube
- Azure Functions vs OpenTelemetry
- Azure Functions vs Railway
- Azure Functions vs Fly.io
- Azure Functions vs Encore
- Azure Functions vs Vultr
- Azure Functions vs Hetzner Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Google Cloud Platform
- Azure Functions vs Microsoft Azure
- Azure Functions vs Coolify
- Azure Functions vs Wasabi
- Azure Functions vs Thanos
- Azure Functions vs Zipkin
- Azure Functions vs Anyscale
- Azure Functions vs Fireworks AI
- Zeabur vs Go
- Zeabur vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Zeabur vs Porter
- Zeabur vs Beam Cloud
- Zeabur vs Upstash
- Zeabur vs Oracle Cloud
- Zeabur vs SST
- Zeabur vs Tencent Cloud
- Zeabur vs Terragrunt
- Zeabur vs Neon
- Zeabur vs Pulumi
- Zeabur vs Lambda
- Zeabur vs Linode
- Zeabur vs Longhorn
- Zeabur vs Northflank
- Zeabur vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zeabur vs minikube
- Zeabur vs OpenTelemetry
- Zeabur vs Railway
- Zeabur vs Fly.io
- Zeabur vs Encore
- Zeabur vs Vultr
- Zeabur vs Hetzner Cloud
- Zeabur vs Google Cloud Platform
- Zeabur vs Microsoft Azure
- Zeabur vs Coolify
- Zeabur vs Wasabi
- Zeabur vs Thanos
- Zeabur vs Zipkin
- Zeabur vs Anyscale
- Zeabur vs Fireworks AI


