Cloud · head to head
OpenTelemetry vs Wasabi

OpenTelemetry
Cloud
Vendor-neutral standard for traces, metrics and logs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenTelemetry has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OpenTelemetry genuinely complex to adopt: collectors, pipelines, samplers and exporters are a system to run in their own right; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: OpenTelemetry covers Vendor-neutral SDKs, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenTelemetry and Wasabi actually diverge.
| Attribute | OpenTelemetry | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $7.99/month |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Unknown |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker | Web, API |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenTelemetry
- Vendor-neutral SDKs
- Collector
- Three signals
- Auto-instrumentation
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenTelemetry
- Instrumenting once and keeping the option to change observability vendor laternot Wasabi
- Standardising telemetry across services written in different languagesnot Wasabi
- Routing and filtering telemetry centrally to control observability spendnot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot OpenTelemetry
- Media storagenot OpenTelemetry
- Archive replacementnot OpenTelemetry
- Ransomware protectionnot OpenTelemetry
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenTelemetry
- Genuinely complex to adopt: collectors, pipelines, samplers and exporters are a system to run in their own right
- Language SDKs mature at different rates, so a polyglot estate gets uneven support
- It produces and moves telemetry but does not store or visualise it, so a backend is still required and still billed
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenTelemetry
Free- OpenTelemetryFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenTelemetry if
- You need vendor-neutral sdks.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker.
- You also want collector.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenTelemetry or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenTelemetry starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenTelemetry or Wasabi?
- OpenTelemetry has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OpenTelemetry and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does OpenTelemetry or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- OpenTelemetry runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use OpenTelemetry for free?
- Yes. OpenTelemetry has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What is OpenTelemetry best used for?
- OpenTelemetry is most often used for instrumenting once and keeping the option to change observability vendor later, standardising telemetry across services written in different languages, routing and filtering telemetry centrally to control observability spend. Of those, instrumenting once and keeping the option to change observability vendor later and standardising telemetry across services written in different languages are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenTelemetry do that Wasabi cannot?
- OpenTelemetry covers Vendor-neutral SDKs, Collector, Three signals, Auto-instrumentation. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenTelemetry: Is OpenTelemetry free?
Yes, open source under the CNCF. What you pay for is the backend you export to.
Wasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceOpenTelemetry: Does OpenTelemetry replace Datadog or Grafana?
No. It replaces their proprietary agents and instrumentation libraries. You still need a backend to store and query the data.
Wasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceOpenTelemetry: Why adopt a vendor-neutral standard?
Because instrumentation is the expensive part. Once code emits OTel, changing observability vendor is a collector config change instead of re-instrumenting every service.
Wasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
More on OpenTelemetry
Other head to heads
- OpenTelemetry vs Zipkin
- OpenTelemetry vs Grafana Cloud
- OpenTelemetry vs VictoriaMetrics
- OpenTelemetry vs OpenEBS
- OpenTelemetry vs Fly.io
- OpenTelemetry vs Cerebrium
- OpenTelemetry vs Northflank
- OpenTelemetry vs Oracle Cloud
- OpenTelemetry vs Porter
- OpenTelemetry vs Serverless Framework
- OpenTelemetry vs CapRover
- OpenTelemetry vs Coolify
- OpenTelemetry vs IBM Cloud
- OpenTelemetry vs Koyeb
- OpenTelemetry vs Microsoft Azure
- OpenTelemetry vs Nitric
- OpenTelemetry vs Nomad
- OpenTelemetry vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- OpenTelemetry vs DigitalOcean
- OpenTelemetry vs Hetzner Cloud
- OpenTelemetry vs Scaleway
- OpenTelemetry vs Linode
- OpenTelemetry vs Vultr
- OpenTelemetry vs Zeabur
- OpenTelemetry vs Contabo
- OpenTelemetry vs Encore
- OpenTelemetry vs Google Cloud Platform
- OpenTelemetry vs HAProxy
- OpenTelemetry vs kind
- OpenTelemetry vs Kustomize
- OpenTelemetry vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Zipkin
- Wasabi vs Grafana Cloud
- Wasabi vs VictoriaMetrics
- Wasabi vs OpenEBS
- Wasabi vs Fly.io
- Wasabi vs Cerebrium
- Wasabi vs Northflank
- Wasabi vs Oracle Cloud
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Serverless Framework
- Wasabi vs CapRover
- Wasabi vs Coolify
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs Nitric
- Wasabi vs Nomad
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd

