Developer Tools · head to head
Azure DevOps vs OWASP ZAP

Azure DevOps
Developer Tools
Plan smarter, collaborate better, and ship faster
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Azure DevOps first 5 users free applies to Basic plan only; Test Plans users are not included in free tier; OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure DevOps and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure DevOps | OWASP ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | mixed | free |
| Platforms | Web | Desktop, Cli, Api |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | Unknown | 2001 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure DevOps
Nothing recorded that OWASP ZAP does not also cover.
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure DevOps
- CI/CD pipelines and build automation for software development teamsnot OWASP ZAP
- Source code repository management and version controlnot OWASP ZAP
- Test planning and tracking for QA teamsnot OWASP ZAP
- Artifact storage for packages and binariesnot OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot Azure DevOps
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot Azure DevOps
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot Azure DevOps
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot Azure DevOps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure DevOps
- First 5 users free applies to Basic plan only; Test Plans users are not included in free tier
- Storage pricing increases per-GiB cost as volumes grow, with no volume discount threshold below $0.25
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure DevOps
Free- Basic$6/month per user
- First 5 users free
- Additional users $6/user/month
- Pipelines (free tier)
- Basic + Test Plans$52/month per user
- All Basic features
- Test planning, tracking, and execution
- Azure Pipelines CI/CD - Microsoft-hosted$40/month per additional parallel job
- 1 free parallel job with 1,800 minutes per month
- Additional jobs at $40/month each
- Azure Artifacts Storage$2/month per GiB
- First 2 GiB free
- 2-10 GiB: $2/GiB
- 10-100 GiB: $1/GiB
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Which should you pick?
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure DevOps or OWASP ZAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure DevOps starts at Free and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure DevOps or OWASP ZAP?
- Azure DevOps starts at Free and OWASP ZAP at Free.
- Does Azure DevOps or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
- Azure DevOps runs on Web. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- Can I use Azure DevOps for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Azure DevOps best used for?
- Azure DevOps is most often used for ci/cd pipelines and build automation for software development teams, source code repository management and version control, test planning and tracking for qa teams, artifact storage for packages and binaries. Of those, ci/cd pipelines and build automation for software development teams and source code repository management and version control are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure DevOps do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
- OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Azure DevOps: How much does Azure DevOps cost?
Azure DevOps Basic plan is $6 per user per month after the first 5 users are free. Basic + Test Plans tier costs $52 per user per month. Azure Pipelines add-on for extra parallel jobs costs $40 per job for Microsoft-hosted runners and $15 per job for self-hosted runners.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
Azure DevOps: Is there a free tier for Azure DevOps?
Yes, Azure DevOps includes 5 free users on the Basic plan. Additional free allocations include 1,800 free minutes per month on Azure Pipelines with a free parallel job, 2 GiB free storage on Azure Artifacts, and free access for Visual Studio subscribers and Stakeholders with limited functionality.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
Azure DevOps: What does the Basic + Test Plans tier add to Azure DevOps?
The Basic + Test Plans tier adds test planning and execution capabilities, browser-based testing, and centralized reporting features. This tier costs $52 per user per month compared to $6 per user for the Basic plan.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
Azure DevOps: How is Azure Artifacts priced?
Azure Artifacts provides 2 GiB of free storage, then charges $2 per GiB for 2-10 GiB, $1 per GiB for 10-100 GiB, $0.50 per GiB for 100-1,000 GiB, and $0.25 per GiB for over 1,000 GiB.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
More on Azure DevOps
Other head to heads
- Azure DevOps vs pnpm
- Azure DevOps vs Visual Studio Code
- Azure DevOps vs ESLint
- Azure DevOps vs Turborepo
- Azure DevOps vs Yarn
- Azure DevOps vs Buildkite
- Azure DevOps vs Spacelift
- Azure DevOps vs Keycloak
- Azure DevOps vs CodeSandbox
- Azure DevOps vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Azure DevOps vs Depot
- Azure DevOps vs Harness
- Azure DevOps vs Keil MDK
- Azure DevOps vs Vite
- Azure DevOps vs Bazel
- Azure DevOps vs Daytona
- Azure DevOps vs Earthly
- Azure DevOps vs 1Password
- Azure DevOps vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Azure DevOps vs Norton 360
- Azure DevOps vs LastPass
- Azure DevOps vs Bitwarden
- Azure DevOps vs Burp Suite
- Azure DevOps vs Metasploit
- Azure DevOps vs Wireshark
- Azure DevOps vs authentik
- Azure DevOps vs Authelia
- Azure DevOps vs Infisical
- Azure DevOps vs Trivy
- Azure DevOps vs Feedzai
- Azure DevOps vs Frontegg
- Azure DevOps vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Azure DevOps vs JumpCloud
- Azure DevOps vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs pnpm
- OWASP ZAP vs Visual Studio Code
- OWASP ZAP vs ESLint
- OWASP ZAP vs Turborepo
- OWASP ZAP vs Yarn
- OWASP ZAP vs Buildkite
- OWASP ZAP vs Spacelift
- OWASP ZAP vs Keycloak
- OWASP ZAP vs CodeSandbox
- OWASP ZAP vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- OWASP ZAP vs Depot
- OWASP ZAP vs Harness
- OWASP ZAP vs Keil MDK
- OWASP ZAP vs Vite
- OWASP ZAP vs Bazel
- OWASP ZAP vs Daytona
- OWASP ZAP vs Earthly
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
